Literature DB >> 34180520

Impact of different wavelengths of artificial light at night on phototaxis in aquatic insects.

Judith L Kühne1,2, Roy H A van Grunsven1,3, Andreas Jechow1, Franz Hölker1,2.   

Abstract

The use of artificial light at night (ALAN) is increasing exponentially worldwide and there is growing evidence that ALAN contributes to the decline of insect populations. One of the most conspicuous ecological effects is the strong attraction of ALAN to flying insects. In several studies, light sources with strong short wavelength emissions have been shown to attract the highest numbers of flying insects. Furthermore, flying stages of aquatic insects are reported to be more vulnerable to ALAN than flying stages of terrestrial insects. This is concerning because freshwater habitats are likely affected by ALAN that originates from human activity centers, which are typically close to sources of freshwater. However, the effects of ALAN on aquatic insects, that spend their larval phase (amphibiotic insects) or their whole life cycle (fully aquatic insects) in freshwaters, are entirely understudied. Here, we investigated phototaxis of aquatic insects to ALAN at different wavelengths and intensities. We used floating light traps and compared four, near monochromatic, lights (blue, green, red and yellow) at two different photopic light intensities in a ditch system, which was not exposed to ALAN previously. Similar to flying stages of (aquatic and terrestrial) insects we found a strong positive phototaxis of aquatic life stages. However, in contrast to the flying stages there is no clear preference for short-wavelength light. Overall, responsivity to wavelengths in the center of the visible range (green, yellow; 500-600nm) was significant for all orders of aquatic insects studied and the nymphs of Ephemeroptera didn't respond to blue light at all. This is likely an adaption to how light is attenuated in freshwater systems, where not only the water itself but also a variety of optical constituents act as a color filter, often like in in our case filtering out short-wavelength light. Therefore, insects living in freshwater bodies often live in longer wavelength-dominated environments and might therefore be especially sensitive to green/yellow light. In conclusion, the different spectral sensitivities of both aquatic and flying insects should be taken into account when planning lighting near fresh water.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34180520     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  2 in total

1.  Spectral sensitivity transition in the compound eyes of a twilight-swarming mayfly and its visual ecological implications.

Authors:  Ádám Egri; Ádám Mészáros; György Kriska
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  High-Throughput Phototactic Ecotoxicity Biotests with Nauplii of Artemia franciscana.

Authors:  Yutao Bai; Jason Henry; Tomasz M Karpiński; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.