Literature DB >> 34179712

Prevalence of short stature among children in China: A systematic review.

Fulun Li1, Ke Liu2, Qianlong Zhao1, Junyi Chen1, Lingfei Liu3, Qingmu Xie4, Jing Yang1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The prevalence and characteristics of short stature (SS) among children in China should be assessed to provide guidance for planning and implementation of nationwide public health policies. Thus far, there have been no accurate estimates of the prevalence of SS in China.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of SS among children in China and to explore the influences of sex, area, age, study year, and study site on prevalence rates.
METHODS: Relevant literature was identified by searching the following databases: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature, China Knowledge Resource Integrated, WeiPu, and WanFang databases. Meta-analysis was carried out using STATA 11.2.
RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 39 studies with 348 326 Chinese participants; the studies covered 20 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions. The pooled prevalence of SS was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6%-3.7%; I 2 = 99.8%). The prevalence of SS in boys and girls were 3.1% (95% CI, 2.5%-3.7%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.9%), respectively. The sex difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The prevalence of SS was higher in rural areas than in urban areas (4.7% [95% CI, 3.6%-5.8%] vs. 2.8% [95% CI, 2.2%-3.4%]; P < 0.001). The prevalence of SS was higher in West China (5.2%; 95% CI, 4.4%-6.0%) than in Northeast China (0.6%; 95% CI, 0.3%-0.8%), East China (2.3%; 95% CI, 1.9%-2.8%), or Central China (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.9%-3.9%).
INTERPRETATION: The prevalence of SS among children was higher in western and rural areas of China. Close attention to children's growth and development is needed to prevent the occurrence of SS.
© 2021 Chinese Medical Association. Pediatric Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Futang Research Center of Pediatric Development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Meta‐analysis; Prevalence; Short stature

Year:  2021        PMID: 34179712      PMCID: PMC8212717          DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Investig        ISSN: 2574-2272


INTRODUCTION

Short stature (SS) is individual height that is <2 standard deviations below (or below the third percentile of) the average height among children with the same ethnicity, age, and sex under similar living conditions. , Individual height is affected by genetic and environmental factors such as nutrition, disease, and physiology. Hormonal therapy, nutritional regulation, and reasonable exercise can promote height growth before epiphyseal closure. Many studies have shown that children with SS lack confidence and have different degrees of adjustment disorder, cognitive disorders, and self‐consciousness disturbance. Moreover, treatment for SS is both extensive and expensive, constituting an economic burden for families and society. , , Numerous investigations of stature characteristics have been performed at different sites and areas of China. These investigations showed that in 2018, the total rate of SS among children ages 6–23 months in the middle region of China (i.e., Anhui, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Shanxi Provinces) was 5.9%. Wang et al found that the average detection rate of SS in primary and middle school students was 3.16% in Anhui province in 2015. A recent investigation of 213 795 Han school children from 30 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions showed that the prevalence of SS was 3.70% of children aged 7–18 years in China. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no systematic review of the stature characteristics of children in China; no exact statistical data are available regarding the prevalence of SS in these children. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published literature regarding SS among children in China. Specifically, we explored the prevalence with respect to various characteristics including sex, area, age, study time, and study site in subgroup analyses.

METHODS

Search strategy

The literature search process is shown in Figure 1. Two investigators (Qianlong Zhao and Junyi Chen) independently searched the literature using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature, China Knowledge Resource Integrated, WeiPu, and WanFang databases; databases were searched from inception until February 2019. Search terms included “short stature”, “stunting”, “growth retardation”, “incidence”, “prevalence”, “epidemiology”, and “China”. The literature search included original articles, review articles, and meta‐analyses. Literature search strategy was shown in Figure S1.
FIGURE 1

Flow diagram for the included studies in this meta‐analysis.

Flow diagram for the included studies in this meta‐analysis.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Articles were included if they met the following criteria: 1) they described a cross‐sectional survey conducted in China (only baseline data were extracted); 2) participants were <18 years of age; 3) the diagnosis of SS was established in accordance with the guidelines of the genetic metabolic endocrine group of pediatrics branch in Chinese Medical Association, such that one of the following conditions was met: i) height < 2 standard deviations of average height for children of the same ethnicity, sex, and age; ii) height below the third percentile of average height (−1.88 standard deviations) for children of the same ethnicity, sex, and age; iii) bone age less than chronological age by > 2 years; iv) height growth rate below the 25th percentile based on bone age (annual growth rate of 4.5‐year‐old children to adolescent children ≥ 5 cm; annual growth rate of adolescent children ≥ 6 cm).

Data collection and extraction

After removal of duplicate references, two investigators (Fulun Li and Ke Liu) independently screened the titles and abstracts of all records to identify articles that met the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus or by consultation with a senior researcher (Jing Yang). We used a predefined form to extract relevant characteristics of included literature such as title, the first author, study year, sample size, and age and sex of participants.

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool (Table 1), which incorporates 10 domains. A study was considered to be of low quality if 0–5 criteria were met, whereas it was considered to be of high quality if 5–10 criteria were met. Two reviewers (Fulun Li and Ke Liu) independently assessed methodological quality. Disagreements were resolved by consultation with a senior researcher (Jing Yang).
TABLE 1

Characteristics of the included studies

Study yearFirst authorReference numberEventsSample sizeAge range (year)RegionSampling methodsDiagnostic criteriaQuality appraisal
2014Wang Q138012 0097–18Central of ChinaStratified random cluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd9
2014Yang X1026 662581 0160–5West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD9
2014Chen XJ1117260827–12Central of ChinaStratified cluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd9
2015Wang LF1273563 0493–14East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2012Cao LF1330149306–11East of ChinaRandom cluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd9
2000Chen AY147574556–12East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd8
2003Cheng RQ15265870 4316–18East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2012Dou YR16332554 7436–18West of ChinaStratified cluster sampling<2SD10
2010Fu DL1710753746–13East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD9
2000Liu HJ189915 4797–13East of ChinaRandom cluster sampling<2SD9
2013Li SL1977080437–13West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd7
2014Liu SS2028790956–16East of ChinaRandom cluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd10
2014Liu Y219435937–18Central of ChinaStratified random cluster sampling<P3rd9
2000Lou XM22104324012–16Central of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD8
2014Ma FF231822673–6East of ChinaRandom sampling<2SD8
2016Qin Y24164030 0003–14Central of ChinaCluster sampling9
2003Qiu XG2523023 5126–12East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd9
2015Rui QQ265820696–12East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD9
2018Sang MY2727214 1797–18Central of ChinaCluster sampling<P3rd10
2016Tao XG2821093380–14East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2018Wang M297380906–12Northeast of ChinaStratified random cluster sampling<P3rd9
2012Wang ZH305237223–5MixedMulti‐stage stratified cluster sampling<P3rd9
2018Wen YH3158692146–14West of ChinaRandom cluster sampling<2SD or <P3rd9
2017Wu LH329820000–7West of ChinaRandom cluster sampling<2SD8
2011Xiang J33155370 9186–18West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2015Xu JJ3419410 4366–12Central of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2016Yao X3511883366–18West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2011Ye ZZ364746109 6003–6West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD9
1989Zhang JH3712687836–13Northeast of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD9
2017Zhou LH385431066–12West of ChinaRandom sampling8
2012Du FF3929933946–14West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD8
2012Gao G4027938 0057–12East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
2013Liu J4117220175–19West of ChinaCluster sampling10
20112913 300Northeast of China
2012Liu WD422914 0223–5Northeast of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD7
20133014 676Northeast of China
2012Peng HL439827353–5West of ChinaRandom sampling<2SD8
20083313430East of China
2009Qu BX4428730543–7East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD8
20101803304East of China
2014Xu HY459044363–7Central of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD8
20101805048West of China
2011Yang Y4645857983–5West of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
20123155724West of China
20064712 966East of China
20074312 922East of China
2008Yu WP473013 7663–6East of ChinaCluster sampling<2SD10
20092514 349East of China
20102415 271East of China

Diagnostic criteria: <2SD, height <2 standard deviation (SD) of average height in same ethnicity, sex, and age;

Characteristics of the included studies Diagnostic criteria: <2SD, height <2 standard deviation (SD) of average height in same ethnicity, sex, and age;

Statistical analysis

The pooled prevalence of SS in the included studies were determined and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analyses in this study were conducted using STATA software (version 11.2; StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on sex, age, area, study time, and study site. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the Q test and I 2 statistic (no heterogeneity: I 2 = 0%–25%; moderate heterogeneity: 25%–50%; large heterogeneity: 50%–75%; and extreme heterogeneity: 75%–100%). Fixed effects model analysis was used when P ≥ 0.10 or I 2 < 50%; otherwise, random effects model analysis was used. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s funnel plot. All P values were two‐tailed and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the included studies

In total, 3630 eligible articles were identified in the initial literature search; of these, 39 met the inclusion criteria after screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, as well as removal of duplicates (Figure 1). The 39 studies included a total of 1 348 326 participants (Table 1). , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , One study was published in English, while the remaining 38 were published in Chinese. Sample sizes ranged from 2000 to 581 016 participants. Participant age ranged from 6 months to 18 years old. All studies were conducted from 1989 to 2018 in 20 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions in China. Stratification based on China’s four major economic regions revealed that five studies were conducted in Northeast China, 20 were conducted in East China, eight were conducted in Central China, and 15 were conducted in West China.

Prevalence of SS

The pooled prevalence of SS among the 39 studies with available data was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.6%–3.7%; I 2 = 99.8%) (Figure 2). The prevalence of SS in boys and girls were 3.1% (95% CI, 2.5%–3.7%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 2.6%–3.9%), respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.775). Heterogeneity analysis showed great heterogeneity in the pooled prevalence of SS (I 2 > 95%; P < 0.05); therefore, the random effects model was used to conduct subgroup analyses.
FIGURE 2

Forest plot of prevalence estimates of short stature with 95% confidence intervals among children in China.

Forest plot of prevalence estimates of short stature with 95% confidence intervals among children in China. The prevalence of SS was significantly higher in rural areas than in urban areas (4.7% [95% CI, 3.6%–5.8%] vs. 2.8% [95% CI, 2.2%–3.4%]). The prevalence of SS was higher in children aged 6–12 years (3.3%; 95% CI, 2.7%–3.8%) than in children aged > 12 years (3.1%; 95% CI, 2.4%–3.8%) or < 6 years (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.6%–3.3%). The prevalence of SS was higher in studies conducted after 2010 (3.3%; 95% CI, 2.7%–4.0%) than in studies conducted before 2010 (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.8%–3.2%). The prevalence of SS was higher in West China (5.2%; 95% CI, 4.4%–6.0%) than in Northeast China (0.6%; 95% CI, 0.3%–0.8%), East China (2.3%; 95% CI, 1.9%–2.8%), or Central China (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.9%–3.9%) (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Prevalence of short stature among children in each subgroup

VariablesNumber of studiesEventsSample sizeHeterogeneity of the studiesPrevalence (%)95% Confidence intervalComparison of the groups (P)
I 2 (%) P
Sex0.775
boys257583248 84699.10<0.0013.12.5–3.7
girls257104232 01499.40<0.0013.22.6–3.9
Area<0.001
Urban165121188 76398.90<0.0012.82.2–3.4
Rural168373201 70399.50<0.0014.73.6–5.8
Age (years)<0.001
<62033 222841 88399.90<0.0012.41.6–3.3
6–12257746311 88999.40<0.0013.32.7–3.8
>12143036104 94097.60<0.0013.12.4–3.8
Study year<0.001
<2010113980181 93299.70<0.0012.51.8–3.2
≥20103844 7361 166 39499.90<0.0013.32.7–4.0
Study site<0.001
Northeast of China528758 87199.80<0.0010.60.3–0.8
East of China206024330 06699.50<0.0012.31.9–2.8
Central of China8294683 97598.70<0.0012.91.9–3.9
West of China1539 434871 69299.50<0.0015.24.4–6.0
Prevalence of short stature among children in each subgroup

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

Egger’s test revealed marginal publication bias for SS (t = 2.04, P = 0.047). The results of sensitivity analysis (trim and fill method) of the prevalence of SS indicated that the results were not significantly affected by exclusion of any single study, suggesting that the results were robust (Figures S2 and S3).

DISCUSSION

SS has been identified as a major global health priority and is the focus of several high‐profile initiatives. Notably, SS is an important component of six global nutrition targets for 2025 that were adopted by the World Health Organization in 2012, and may serve as an indicator for the post‐2015 development agenda. The prevalence of SS is important for the surveillance of physical growth of children over time. Thus, information regarding the prevalence and characteristics of SS among children will provide guidance for planning and implementation of nationwide public health policies. , Meta‐analysis, as a statistical analysis method of evidence‐based medicine, aims to increase the sample size by comprehensively analyzing the research results of multiple small samples on the same subject, thus improving the research efficiency of the original results and making the conclusions more representative. This comprehensive meta‐analysis of the prevalence of SS in China included 39 studies with 1 348 326 participants, covering 20 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions. This results showed that the pooled prevalence of SS was 3.2% in China; notably, the prevalence of SS in children < 6 years of age was 2.4%. The United Nations Children’s Fund reported the prevalence of SS in children < 5 years of age in multiple populations : 37.9% in India (2015–2016), 33.4% in the Philippines (2015), 24.6% in Vietnam (2015), 10.5% in Thailand (2015–2016), 7.1% in Japan (2010), 7.0% in Brazil (2006–2007), and 2.5% in the Republic of Korea (2008–2011). The results of this meta‐analysis showed that the prevalence of SS in children < 6 years of age in China was lower than the prevalence in these developing countries. The prevalence of SS (3.3%) was higher in primary school students (aged 6–12 years) than in students aged > 12 years (3.1%) or < 6 years (2.4%). This difference is potentially because children aged 0–6 years can fully obtain nutrition under the care of their parents (children of this age have not yet begun to attend school). Moreover, since 2009, the Chinese government has provided a free Supplementary Nutrition Program for children from 6 months to 2 years of age , ; this program provides a variety of vitamins and minerals for the growth and development of children. Notably, the prevalence of SS was high in primary school students (aged 6–12 years). Children of this age have begun to attend school; notably, some rural children live in boarding houses during school attendance (separate from their parents’ care) and may be unable to achieve satisfactory nutrition, thereby resulting in restricted growth and development. After the age of 13 years, students’ self‐care ability may be increased, such that they adequately monitor nutrition. In recent years, the rate of SS detection has increased, as indicated in Table 2: the prevalence of SS was slightly higher in studies conducted after 2010 than in studies conducted before 2010. This may be because with the improvement of living standards, SS in children has become an important concern to the families and society. The increase in the number of children who went to hospital for the diagnosis of SS can increase the detection rate of SS to some extent. At the same time, with the improvement of the medical level, the recognition and diagnosis of SS by specialists can further increase the prevalence of SS. Our results showed no significant difference in the prevalence of SS between boys and girls. Similar findings regarding sex differences in SS were demonstrated in studies conducted in Arab countries. A study in Saudi Arabia showed no significant difference in the prevalence of SS between boys and girls (5–17 years of age), as did a study in Ankara, Turkey regarding the prevalence of SS in 7–15‐year‐old school‐aged children. However, we found that the prevalence of SS was high in rural (4.7%) and West China (5.2%). Potential explanations for this result are as follows: first, the economic progress of rural areas and West China is very uneven, which directly affects the nutritional status of children living in those areas. For example, the growth and development of school‐aged children (aged 6–12 years) in western rural areas remains suboptimal. Secondly, the educational levels of caregivers are also low in these areas. Children rely on their caregivers to prevent malnutrition; the educational levels of caregivers affect whether they use evidence‐based methods to determine how to feed and care for their children. The educational level of caregivers could also affect family income, thus indirectly affect the nutritional status of their children. , The methodology quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. Of the 39 studies included in this meta‐analysis, 18 had inadequate sample size and 11 had unclear sampling methods; however, these aspects did not have substantial impact on the results of this meta‐analysis. Therefore, these studies were considered to be of high quality. In addition, the included studies did not have incomplete data reports or missing data, and all baselines were comparable. There were some limitations in this meta‐analysis. First, heterogeneity was present among the included studies. Heterogeneity is difficult to avoid in epidemiological studies. Second, the diagnosis of SS was made on the basis of the physical growth and development of children in China, excluding the National Center for Health Statistics/World Health Organization reference data. This method may have caused some bias in the resulting data. Third, publication bias was present in our meta‐analysis because of unclear randomization and concealment methodology in some studies; the prevalence of SS in the included studies demonstrated heterogeneity because of differences in age, area, sample size, study time, and study site. Fourth, the studies included in this meta‐analysis covered only 20 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions in China; thus, they did not cover all possible areas. Finally, relevant factors (e.g., socioeconomic, nutritional, and environmental variables) were not recorded in most studies; therefore, it was difficult to evaluate their impacts on the prevalence of SS. In conclusion, this meta‐analysis showed that the prevalence of SS among children in China was 3.2%. However, the prevalence of SS among children in western and rural areas of China was relatively high, which suggests that governmental care and support should be increased to prevent development of SS among children in these areas.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declare no conflicts of interest. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  14 in total

1.  Psychosocial effects of short stature.

Authors:  David Zlotkin; Surendra K Varma
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Evaluation of a kindergarten-based nutrition education intervention for pre-school children in China.

Authors:  Chuanlai Hu; Dongqing Ye; Yingchun Li; Yongling Huang; Li Li; Yongqing Gao; Sufang Wang
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence.

Authors:  Zachary Munn; Sandeep Moola; Dagmara Riitano; Karolina Lisy
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Interpretation of Z-score anthropometric indicators derived from the international growth reference.

Authors:  M J Dibley; N Staehling; P Nieburg; F L Trowbridge
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  The worldwide magnitude of protein-energy malnutrition: an overview from the WHO Global Database on Child Growth.

Authors:  M de Onís; C Monteiro; J Akré; G Glugston
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  [Investigation on the nutrition and growth status of children aged 6-23 months in Yingyangbao used area of middle part in China].

Authors:  Ou Wang; Jin Li; Lijuan Wang; Jian Huang; Junsheng Huo; Jing Sun
Journal:  Wei Sheng Yan Jiu       Date:  2018-11

8.  Regional prevalence of short stature in Saudi school-age children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mohammad I El Mouzan; Abdullah S Al Herbish; Abdullah A Al Salloum; Ahmad A Al Omer; Mansour M Qurachi
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-03-12

9.  The epidemic characteristics of short stature in school students.

Authors:  Qian Wang; De-Yun Liu; Li-Qi Yang; Yue Liu; Xian-Jun Chen
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 10.  Childhood stunting: a global perspective.

Authors:  Mercedes de Onis; Francesco Branca
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.