| Literature DB >> 34179523 |
R Kacimi1, M Raftani2, T Abram3, A Azaid1, H Ziyat2, L Bejjit3, M N Bennani2, M Bouachrine1,4.
Abstract
CurEntities:
Keywords: DFT; Dye-sensitized solar cells; Organic dyes; Phenothiazine (PTZ)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34179523 PMCID: PMC8214095 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Chemical structure for the PSB-4(R) and designed molecules Di (i = 1–6).
Figure 2Ground-state optimized geometries of the compounds (D1-D6) and R obtained by B3LYP/6-31G (d, p).
Figure 3(FMOs) diagram of the molecular orbitals HOMO and LUMO of studied dyes D1-D6 and (R) at B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) level of theory.
Figure 4Electron density difference maps between the excited states and the ground ones of dyes Di (i = 1–6) and the reference R.
The energy of HOMOs, LUMOs, and Egap at B3LYP/6–31 G (d, p) level of theory for the compounds Di (i = 1–6) and R. In the parenthesis, the experimental values are given.
| Dye | EHOMO | ELUMO | Egap |
|---|---|---|---|
| R | -5.01 (-5.07) | -2.88 (-2.88) | 2.13 (2.19) |
| D1 | -5.20 | -3.33 | 1.87 |
| D2 | -5.15 | -3.40 | 1.76 |
| D3 | -5.20 | -3.25 | 1.96 |
| D4 | -5.16 | -3.41 | 1.75 |
| D5 | -5.16 | -3.73 | 1.43 |
| D6 | -5.03 | -3.50 | 1.53 |
Figure 5Energy level plot of the designed compounds D1 to D6 and R.
Figure 6Density of states for the studied dyes D1-D6 and (R) at B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) level of theory.
The NBO analysis of all the designed compounds (D1-D6) and reference (R) at B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) level of theory.
| dyes | Donating | π-spacer | Acceptor Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.019 | 0.108 | -0.127 |
| D1 | 0.045 | 0.058 | -0.109 |
| D2 | 0.045 | 0.083 | -0.123 |
| D3 | 0.037 | 0.083 | -0.120 |
| D4 | 0.035 | 0.076 | -0.114 |
| D5 | 0.064 | 0.067 | -0.131 |
| D6 | 0.045 | 0.110 | -0.155 |
Computed maximum absorption wavelengths (λmax, in nm), f, and major percentage contribution for all designed dyes D1 to D6 and molecule R using CAM -B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) method in the gas phase.
| Dyes | Calcu. | Eex (eV) | MO/character | (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 463.35 | 2.6740 | 1.5586 | HOMO→LUMO | (63%) |
| 383.12 | 2.6740 | 0.4411 | HOMO-2 →LUMO | (35%) | |
| 361.22 | 3.2340 | 0.7634 | HOMO-3→LUMO | (35%) | |
| D1 | 514.50 | 2.4081 | 1.5103 | HOMO →LUMO | (63%) |
| 389.32 | 3.1824 | 0.0977 | HOMO-1 →LUMO | (58%) | |
| 336.58 | 3.6810 | 0.1855 | HOMO-1→LUMO+1 | (35%) | |
| D2 | 569.26 | 2.1765 | 1.7884 | HOMO→LUMO | (66%) |
| 403.57 | 3.0701 | 0.0138 | HOMO-1 →LUMO | (59%) | |
| 360.80 | 3.4340 | 0.0586 | HOMO →LUMO+1 | (46%) | |
| D3 | 511.21 | 2.0289 | 1.3967 | HOMO →LUMO | (63%) |
| 379.54 | 2.0724 | 0.0246 | HOMO-1 →LUMO | (55%) | |
| 347.73 | 2.8230 | 0.3830 | HOMO-1 →LUMO+1 | (39%) | |
| D4 | 537.59 | 2.6740 | 1.4992 | HOMO →LUMO | (61%) |
| 404.05 | 2.0151 | 0.0643 | HOMO-1 →LUMO | (49%) | |
| 365.79 | 2.9178 | 0.2026 | HOMO-1 →LUMO+1 | (33%) | |
| D5 | 729.15 | 1.6992 | 0.9254 | HOMO → LUMO | (85%) |
| 478.02 | 2.5919 | 0.0384 | HOMO-1 →LUMO | (77%) | |
| 403.36 | 3.0717 | 0.0011 | HOMO-8 →LUMO | (81%) | |
| D6 | 732.38 | 1.6918 | 0.8290 | HOMO → LUMO | (92%) |
| 446.12 | 2.7773 | 0.2193 | HOMO-1 →LUMO | (71%) | |
| 420.73 | 2.9449 | 0.6509 | HOMO →LUMO+1 | (72%) |
Figure 7Stimulated absorption spectra of molecules D1-D6 and R in the gas phase using CAM-B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) method.
The calculated values of (ELUMO (eV), EHOMO (eV), and VOC (eV), ΔGinject, ΔGreg, and LHE for the dyes D1 to D6 and reference R calculated at DFT/B3LYP/6-31G (d,p).
| dyes | EHOMO | ELUMO | E00 | Edyes | Edyes∗ | ΔGinject | ΔGreg | LHE | Voc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | -5.01 | -2.88 | 2.67 | 5.01 | 2.34 | -1.66 | -0.21 | 0.97 | 1.12 |
| D1 | -5.20 | -3.33 | 2.67 | 5.20 | 2.80 | -1.2 | -0.40 | 0.97 | 0.67 |
| D2 | -5.15 | -3.40 | 2.14 | 5.15 | 2.97 | -1.03 | -0.35 | 0.98 | 0.60 |
| D3 | -5.20 | -3.25 | 2.03 | 5.20 | 3.17 | -0.83 | -0.40 | 0.96 | 0.75 |
| D3 | -5.16 | -3.41 | 2.02 | 5.16 | 2.49 | -1.51 | -0.36 | 0.97 | 0.59 |
| D5 | -5.16 | -3.73 | 1.69 | 5.16 | 3.46 | -0.54 | -0.36 | 0.88 | 0.27 |
| D6 | -5.03 | -3.50 | 2.02 | 5.03 | 3.33 | -0.67 | -0.23 | 0.85 | 0.50 |
| TiO2 | -7.2 | -4 |
Figure 8Energies of the neutral compounds at the ground state and the cationic (anionic) systems.
Reorganization energies, λtotal values (eV) and excited-state lifetime t (ns) of the designed molecules (D1-D6) and R.
| dyes | λe | λh | λtotal | t (ns) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.57 | 0.14 |
| D1 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.64 | 0.17 |
| D2 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 0.18 |
| D3 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.62 | 0.26 |
| D4 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.55 | 0.14 |
| D5 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| D6 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.60 | 0.62 |
Figure 9Transition Density Matrix (TDM) of the compounds D1-D6 and R, Donor (D), Acceptor (A) and Bridge (B) calculated at DFT/B3LYP/6-31G (d,p).
Calculated energy gap Egap, first singlet excitation energy (Eopt), and the exciton binding energies (Eb).
| dyes | Egap (eV) | Eopt (eV) | Eb (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| R | 2.13 | 1.93 | 0.20 |
| D1 | 1.87 | 1.77 | 0.10 |
| D2 | 1.76 | 1.62 | 0.14 |
| D3 | 1.96 | 1.79 | 0.17 |
| D4 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 0.04 |
| D5 | 1.43 | 1.12 | 0.31 |
| D6 | 1.53 | 1.15 | 0.38 |