| Literature DB >> 34179515 |
Maher M Fadel1, Faten R Abdel Ghaffar1, Shimaa K Zwain2, Hany M Ibrahim1, Eman Ae Badr3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the serum level of netrin and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-I) in patients with type IΙ diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and evaluate the association of their levels with the development of a diabetic complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was carried out on type II diabetic patients with and without complications and healthy individuals served as controls. All subjects were submitted to the estimation of serum lipid profile, serum creatinine, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), visceral adiposity index (VAI), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and detection of serum level of netrin1 and VCAM1.Entities:
Keywords: Complications; Diabetes; Netrin1; VCAM1
Year: 2021 PMID: 34179515 PMCID: PMC8209750 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Demographic and anthropometric data of controls and T2DM patients with or without complications
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No % | No % | No % | |
| 14(17.5%) | 14(28%) | 8(16%) | |
| Female | 66(82.5%) | 36 (72%) | 42(84%) |
| – | 10(20%) | 9(18%) | |
| – | 40(80%) | 41(82%) | |
| 52.22 ± 8.72 | 51.80 ± 6.84 | 48.92 ± 8.05 | |
| 61.25 ± 4.60 | 100.13 ± 6.558# | 101.38 ± 8.21# | |
| 162.74 ± 4.87 | 164.43 ± 4.54 | 162.51 ± 3.03 | |
| 23.13 ± 1.53 | 37.09 ± 2.77# | 38.48 ± 4.01# | |
| 64.7 ± 4.38 | 106.86 ± 5.10* | 108.98 ± 7.08* | |
| 84.33 ± 4.53 | 117.20 ± 4.73* | 118.38 ± 6.60* | |
| 0.76 ± 0.027 | 0.91 ± 0.02* | 0.92 ± 0.02* | |
| 114 ± 6.75 | 114.80 ± 7.35 | 117.80 ± 7.37* | |
| 75.8 ± 3.82 | 74.40 ± 5.77 | 74.60 ± 6.05 | |
| 1.32 ± 0.29 | 2.51 ± 0.44* | 2.90 ± 0.68*$ | |
| −0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.17 ± 0.07# | 0.21 ± 0.10# | |
| 7.30 ± 7.62 | 70.96 ± 13.65# | 84.43 ± 17.88#$ | |
SD: standard deviation, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, BMI: body mass index.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (% among study population).
(*) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I control using ANOVA.
(#) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I control using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
($) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group II T2DM without complication.
Fasting blood sugar, (mg/dl) 2HPPBS (mg/dl) and HbA1c (%) of controls and T2DM patients with or without complications
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| 91.5 ± 5.17 | 177.64 ± 28.1* | 180.78 ± 15.32* | |
| 124.22 ± 8.35 | 291.02 ± 43.61* | 260.88 ± 35.65*$ | |
| 4.82 ± 0.31 | 8.53 ± 0.80* | 8.77 ± 0.60* |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
FBS: fasting blood sugar, 2HPPBS: 2 h postprandial blood sugar, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin.
(*) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I control using ANOVA.
($) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group II T2DM without complication.
Renal functions and lipid profile of controls and T2DM patients with or without complications.
| Group I | Group II | Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| 0.71 ± 0.10 | 0.88 ± 0.12 | 1.30 ± 0.41#$ | |
| 16.7 ± 4.52 | 18.02 ± 3.25 | 338.66 ± 53.61#$ | |
| 141.27 ± 19.45 | 192.09 ± 19.37# | 191.34 ± 31.55# | |
| 127.5 ± 12.17 | 134.12 ± 19.51 | 150.62 ± 26.77# | |
| 57.29 ± 20.014 | 126.76 ± 23.0# | 124.58 ± 34.0# | |
| 58.8 ± 5.69 | 39.46 ± 3.08* | 40.33 ± 2.91* |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (% among study population).
(*) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I control using ANOVA.
(#) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I control using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
($) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group II T2DM without complication.
Fig. 1Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 in the three studied groups. (#) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I controlusing Kruskal-Wallis test. ($) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group II T2DM without complication.
Fig. 2Netrin 1 in the three studied groups. (#) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group I controlusing Kruskal-Wallis test. ($) indicate significant P < 0.05 difference compared with group II T2DM without complication.
Correlation between VCAM1 with different parameters in each examined group
| Group I | Group II | Group III | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | P | rs | p | rs | p | |
| 0.287 | 0.004* | 0.256 | 0.073 | −0.149 | 0.303 | |
| 0.189 | 0.091 | 0.070 | 0.632 | −0.285 | 0.045* | |
| 0.070 | 0.475 | 0.184 | 0.200 | 0.476 | <0.001* | |
| 0.165 | 0.105 | −0.309 | 0.029* | −0.049 | 0.734 | |
| −0.059 | 0.573 | 0.431 | 0.002* | 0.050 | 0.731 | |
| 0.025 | 0.840 | −0.072 | 0.621 | 0.358 | 0.011* | |
| 0.206 | 0.040* | −0.184 | 0.201 | −0.416 | 0.003* | |
| −0.154 | 0.133 | −0.202 | 0.160 | 0.279 | 0.049* | |
| −0.125 | 0.230 | 0.037 | 0.797 | 0.344 | 0.015* | |
r: Spearman coefficient *: Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05.
Correlation between Netrin1 with different parameters in all studied group
| Group I | Group II | Group III | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | p | rs | p | rs | p | |
| 0.080 | 0.410 | 0.013 | 0.927 | −0.384 | 0.006* | |
| 0.155 | 0.119 | −0.020 | 0.892 | −0.319 | 0.024* | |
| −0.016 | 0.909 | 0.005 | 0.972 | −0.486 | <0.001* | |
| 0.0145 | 0.904 | 0.078 | 0.590 | −0.468 | 0.001* | |
| −0.026 | 0.775 | 0.081 | 0.576 | 0.309 | 0.029* | |
| 0.033 | 0.734 | −0.085 | 0.558 | 0.324 | 0.022* | |
| 0.025 | 0.785 | 0.241 | 0.091 | 0.489 | <0.001* | |
| −0.110 | 0.250 | −0.262 | 0.066 | −0.518 | <0.001* | |
| −0.009 | 0.943 | 0.106 | 0.465 | 0.300 | 0.034* | |
| −0.103 | 0.296 | −0.121 | 0.404 | 0.408 | 0.003* | |
| 0.095 | 0.326 | −0.117 | 0.418 | 0.399 | 0.004* | |
| −0.035 | 0.709 | −0.038 | 0.794 | 0.415 | 0.003* | |
r: Spearman coefficient *: Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05.
Agreement of sensitivity and/or specificity for VCAM1 (ng/ml) and Netrin1 (pg/ml)
| AUC | P | 95% C.I | Cut off | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | UL | ||||||||
| To differentiate between patients and control | |||||||||
| 0.95 | <0.001 | 0.92 | 0.98 | >240 | 97.0 | 87.0 | 88.2 | 96.7 | |
| 0.99 | <0.001 | 0.99 | 1.00 | >292.01 | 98.0 | 95.0 | 95.1 | 97.9 | |
| 0.93 | <0.001 | 0.90 | 0.96 | >390 | 90.0 | 91.33 | 77.6 | 96.5 | |
| 0.93 | <0.001 | 0.90 | 0.96 | >393.6 | 96.0 | 82.67 | 64.9 | 98.4 | |
AUC: Area Under a Curve, P-value: Probability value, CI: Confidence Intervals, NPV: Negative predictive value, PPV: Positive predictive value.
Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05, Cut off was choose according to the Youden index.
Fig. 3ROC curve for a-VCAM1 (ng/ml) b- Netrin1(pg/ml) to diffrentiate patients from control.
Fig. 4ROC curve for VCAM1 (ng/ml) and Netrin1 (pg/ml)to diffrentiate patients with complication.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis
| Univariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | OR (95%C.I) | p | OR (95%C.I) | |
| 0.949 (0.899–1.002) | 0.921 (0.839–1.011) | |||
| 1.127 (1.000–1.270) | 0.953 (0.528–1.719) | |||
| 0.999 (0.984–1.014) | 0.959 (0.876–1.051) | |||
| 0.997 (0.984–1.011) | 1.052 (0.973–1.139) | |||
| 1.033 (1.012–1.054) | 0.870 (0.633–1.194) | |||
| 1.105 (0.965–1.265) | 3.630(1.108–11.892) | |||
| 3.882 (1.562–9.648) | 6.599(0.524–83.168) | |||
| 153.5(1.376–17124.4) | 3.026 (0–31.071) | |||
| 1.056 (1.025–1.087) | 0.995 (0.828–1.197) | |||
| 1.570 (1.245–1.979) | 3.083 (1.702–5.583) | |||
| 2.390 (1.606–3.556) | 3.035 (1.638–5.622) | |||
OR: Odd's ratio C.I: Confidence interval LL: Lower limit UL: Upper Limit.
Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.