| Literature DB >> 34179195 |
Amir Ghaffar Shahriari1, Afsaneh Mohkami2, Ali Niazi3, Mohamad Hamed Ghodoum Parizipour4, Maziar Habibi-Pirkoohi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abiotic environmental stresses, especially drought stress, is one of the most important problems in arid and semi-arid regions. Like other major crops, Brassica napus is vulnerable to drought stress.Entities:
Keywords: Drought Stress; Proline; Sargassum Angustifolium; Seaweed Extract
Year: 2021 PMID: 34179195 PMCID: PMC8217533 DOI: 10.30498/IJB.2021.2775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Biotechnol ISSN: 1728-3043 Impact factor: 1.671
Primer details of proline biosynthesis and degradation genes (P5CS and PRODH, respectively) and a housekeeping gene (Elongation factor 1-alpha) used in this study.
| Gene | Primer | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| Elongation factor 1-alpha | F: 5′ ACAAAATCCCATTCGTCCCCATC 3′ | 55.2 |
| R: 5′ ACTGGCACCGTTCCAATACCAC 3′ | 57.2 | |
| P5CS | F: 5′ GCTACAGCACAAGAAGCTGGAC 3′ | 56 |
| R: 5′ TCCAAAACAAGACCATCTGCCAC 3′ | 55.6 | |
| PRODH | F: 5′ CTGAAGACACAATCCTCCAACCC 3′ | 55.2 |
| R: 5′ CACCTCTCACCAACTTAAACCCC 3′ | 55.1 |
F: forward, R: reverse.
Effect of algae extract (AE) treatment on morphological traits (plant height and dry weight) of canola seedling: 80% field capacity for 20 days (Phase I), 60% field capacity for 20 days (Phase II) and 40% field capacity for 20 days (Phase III).
| Traits | Plant height | Dry weight | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase I | Phase II | Phase III | Phase I | Phase II | Phase III | |
| Control | 49.01±1.32c | 47.56±2.22d | 44.33±1.07e | 12.98±1.76c | 12.45±0.34cd | 11.21±1.16d |
| AE | 61.64±1.19a | 59.48±1.13a | 56.22±2.18b | 20.27±1.81a | 19.06±1.45a | 16.13±1.28b |
Figure 1Increase in photosynthetic pigments by AE treatment during three phases of drought stress. (T1, T2 and T3: AE treatment; C1, C2 and C3: control condition during Phase I, II, and III; respectively. chl a: chlorophyll a; chl b: chlorophyll b: chl t: total chlorophyll, car: carotenoid).
Figure 2Impact of AE on ROS scavenging activity of canola seedlings during three phases of drought tolerance. Free radical scavenging activity followed an ascending trend in both control and treatment groups. The values represented in the graph are the mean of three replications.
Figure 3Variation in SOD activity under AE treatment during three phases of drought stress. The values represented in the graph are the mean of three replications.
Figure 4Variation in proline content of canola plants affected by water deficiency. AE treatment significantly improved proline content of the plants compared to control (p<0.05)
Figure 5The results of Real-Time PCR assay on expression of genes including P5CS (top) and PRODH (bottom) involved in biosynthesis of proline.Conclusion