| Literature DB >> 34179170 |
Rolanda S Julius1, Tsungai A Zengeya1,2, E Volker Schwan3, Christian T Chimimba1.
Abstract
Poor socio-economic and unsanitary conditions are conducive to commensal rodent infestations, and these conditions are widespread in South Africa. Cestode species of zoonotic interest are highly prevalent in commensal rodents, such as invasive Rattus norvegicus, Rattus rattus, Rattus tanezumi, and indigenous Mastomys coucha, and have been frequently recovered from human stool samples. These cestode species have similar transmission dynamics to traditional soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), which ties them to infections associated with poverty and poor sanitation. Univariate analysis was used in the present study to determine the association between rodent-related factors and cestode prevalence, while ecological niche modelling was used to infer the potential distribution of the cestode species in South Africa. Cestode prevalence was found to be associated with older rodents, but it was not significantly associated with sex, and ectoparasite presence. The predicted occurrence for rodent-borne cestodes predominantly coincided with large human settlements, typically associated with significant anthropogenic changes. In addition, cestode parasite occurrence was predicted to include areas both inland and along the coast. This is possibly related to the commensal behaviour of the rodent hosts. The study highlights the rodent-related factors associated with the prevalence of parasites in the host community, as well as the environmental variables associated with parasite infective stages that influence host exposure. The application of geospatial modelling together with univariate analysis to predict and explain rodent-borne parasite prevalence may be useful to inform management strategies for targeted interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Hymenolepis diminuta; Hymenolepis nana; South Africa; ecological niche modelling; inermicapsifer madagascariensis; invasive/indigenous murid rodents; parasites; species distribution models
Year: 2021 PMID: 34179170 PMCID: PMC8226005 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.678478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1A map of Gauteng Province, South Africa showing sampling localities of commensal, indigenous Mastomys coucha and commensal, invasive Rattus norvegicus, Rattus rattus, and Rattus tanezumi.
Figure 2Relative age classes I–V in R. norvegicus representing relative age classes in invasive and indigenous commensal, murid rodents from Gauteng Province, South Africa based on the degree of tooth wear of the upper molar tooth row.
A list of environmental variables used to build ecological niche models of rodent-borne cestodes in Gauteng Province, South Africa.
| Clsd1m = Predicted mean clay content at standard soil depth 1 (0–5 cm) |
| Clsd2m = Predicted mean clay content at standard soil depth 2 (5–15 cm) |
| Clsd3m = Predicted mean clay content at standard soil depth 3 (15–30 cm) |
| Sndsd1m = Predicted mean sand content at standard soil depth 1 (0–5 cm) |
| Sndsd2m = Predicted mean sand content at standard soil depth 2 (5–15 cm) |
| Sndsd3m = Predicted mean sand content at standard soil depth 3 (15–30 cm) |
| Sltsd1m = Predicted mean silt content at standard soil depth 1 (0-5 cm) |
| Sltsd2m = Predicted mean silt content at standard soil depth 2 (5–15 cm) |
| Sltsd3m = Predicted mean silt content at standard soil depth 3 (15–30 cm) |
| pHihoxsl1 = Predicted mean pH index (H2O solution) at standard soil depth 1 (0–5 cm) |
| pHihoxsl2 = Predicted mean pH index (H2O solution) at standard soil depth 2 (5–15 cm) |
| pHihoxsl3 = Predicted mean pH index (H2O solution) at standard soil depth 3 (15–30 cm) |
| Orcdrcsl1 = Soil organic carbon at standard soil depth 1 (0–5 cm) |
| Orcdrcsl2 = Soil organic carbon at standard soil depth 2 (5–15 cm) |
| Orcdrcsl3 = Soil organic carbon at standard soil depth 3 (15–30 cm) |
| LST = Land surface temperature |
| NDVI = Normalised difference vegetation index |
| DEM = Digital elevation model/altitude [in metres above sea level (a.s.l.)] |
| GRUMP = Global rural-urban extent |
| HHI = Human influence index/human footprint |
| Afripop = African human population size |
A list of bioclimatic variables used to build ecological niche models of rodent-borne cestodes in Gauteng Province, South Africa.
| BIO1 = Annual mean temperature |
| BIO2 = Mean diurnal range [Mean of monthly (max temp–min temp)] |
| BIO3 = Isothermality (P2/P7) (* 100) |
| BIO4 = Temperature seasonality (standard deviation *100) |
| BIO5 = Max temperature of warmest month |
| BIO6 = Min temperature of coldest month |
| BIO7 = Temperature annual range (P5–P6) |
| BIO8 = Mean temperature of wettest quarter |
| BIO9 = Mean temperature of driest quarter |
| BIO10 = Mean temperature of warmest quarter |
| BIO11 = Mean temperature of coldest quarter |
| BIO12 = Annual precipitation |
| BIO13 = Precipitation of wettest month |
| BIO14 = Precipitation of driest month |
| BIO15 = Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation) |
| BIO16 = Precipitation of wettest quarter |
| BIO17 = Precipitation of driest quarter |
| BIO18 = Precipitation of warmest quarter |
| BIO19 = Precipitation of coldest quarter |
Figure 3A map showing predicted occurrence of rodent-borne cestodoses in South Africa based on environmental suitability (shaded areas). White (non-shaded) areas represent areas where data were unavailable.
Figure 4A map showing predicted occurrence of H. diminuta in South Africa based on environmental suitability (shaded areas). White (non-shaded) areas represent areas where data were unavailable.
Figure 5A map showing predicted occurrence of H. nana in South Africa based on environmental suitability (shaded areas). White (non-shaded) areas represent areas where data were unavailable.
Figure 6A map showing predicted occurrence of I. madagascariensis in South Africa based on environmental suitability (shaded areas). White (non-shaded) areas represent areas where data were unavailable.
Figure 7Map showing the predicted occurrence of rodent-borne cestode taxa (weighted 25%) in South Africa based on environmental suitability (shaded areas) along with known occurrence records represented by yellow, blue, red, and green circles. White (non-shaded) areas represent areas where data were unavailable.