| Literature DB >> 34179050 |
Salomé Conrath1, Vincent Vantilcke1, Mickael Parisot1, Françoise Maire2, Pierre Selles2, Narcisse Elenga1,3.
Abstract
Patients with sickle cell disease often undergo frequent blood transfusions. This increases their exposure to red blood cell alloantigens of donor units, thus making it more likely that they produce alloantibodies. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe the prevalence of allo-immunization in patients with sickle cell disease who were monitored at Cayenne Hospital in 2016. Of the 451 patients recruited during the study period, 238 (52.8%) were female. There were 262 (58.1%) homozygous sickle cell and 151 (33.5%) compound heterozygous sickle cell patients. The median age of the participants was 23.09 years (range, 0.5-68). We noted different red blood cell extended phenotypes: -in the Duffy system, the Fya- Fyb-profile was found in 299 patients (66%);-for the Kidd system, the most represented profile was Jka+ Jkb-, with 213 patients (47%). The Jka antigen was present in 355 patients;-in the MNS system, the S-s+ profile was found in 297 patients (66%);-the Lea antigen of the Lewis system was absent in 319 patients. The most frequent Rh phenotype in our patients was D+ C- E- c+ e+ K-, representing 51% of the patients. A total of 6,834 transfused packed red blood cell units were recorded. Sixty-eight patients (23%; 95% confidence interval, 20-25%) had detectable RBC alloantibodies. In multivariate logistic regression, only the mean number of single transfusions was statistically higher for the alloimmunized patients (p < 0.04). Thirteen (19%) of the patients with alloimmunization developed a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction, thus representing 4.4% of the total number of transfused patients. Whether differences between donors from France vs. recipients from French Guiana could explain this high prevalence of alloimmunization to be examined. In conclusion, careful transfusion strategies for patients with RBC alloantibodies should allow further reduction of the rate of alloimmunization.Entities:
Keywords: alloimmunization; delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction; immunohematological issues; sickle cell disease; transfusion
Year: 2021 PMID: 34179050 PMCID: PMC8226117 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.681549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Age pyramid of patients followed in French Guiana.
Specificities of the 134 RBC alloantibodies identified in 68 SCD patients in French Guiana.
| Rhesus | C, Cw, D, E, e, RH20 | 6, 3, 7, 5, 2, 2 | 25 (19) |
| Kell | K1, K2, K6 | 3, 3, 2 | 8 (6) |
| Duffy | Fy1a, Fyb, Fy3 | 6, 1, 1 | 8 (6) |
| Kidd | Jya, Jyb | 5, 7 | 12 (9) |
| MNS | M, S, MNS30 | 14, 13, 1 | 28 (21) |
| Lutheran | Lua | 3- | 3 (2) |
| Lewis | Lae, Leb, Le3ab | 22, 13, 7 | 42 (31) |
| Non specific antibodies | 8- | 8 (6) |
Figure 2Temporal evolution of number of alloimmunization.
Figure 3Temporal number of transfused packed red blood cells.
Specificities of RBC alloantibodies identified in the 13 patients with DHTR.
| Anti FY1 (Fya) | 4 |
| Anti FY2 (Fyb) | 1 |
| Anti JK1 (Jka) | 2 |
| Anti JK2 (Jkb) | 3 |
| Anti LE1 (Lea) | 4 |
| Anti LE2 (Leb) | 2 |
| Anti LE3 (Lea+b) | 2 |
| Anti MNS1 (M) | 1 |
| Anti MNS2 (N) | 0 |
| Anti MNS3 (S) | 2 |
| Anti MNS30 | 1 |
| Anti RH1 (D) | 1 |
| Anti RH2 (C) | 2 |
| Anti RH3 (E) | 2 |
| Anti KEL1 (K) | 1 |
| Anti KEL3 (Kpa) | 2 |
| Anti LU1 (Lua) | 1 |
| Anti DI3 | 1 |
| Anti Dumbrock 2 | 1 |
| Non-specific | 1 |