| Literature DB >> 34178693 |
Johannes Wach1, Stefanos Apallas1, Matthias Schneider1, Johannes Weller2, Patrick Schuss1, Hartmut Vatter1, Ulrich Herrlinger2, Erdem Güresir1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The mean platelet volume/platelet count (MPV/PC) ratio is an emerging biomarker in selected types of cancer. The objective of this study is to analyze the association of MPV/PC ratio with progression and survival in glioblastoma (GB) patients, with consideration of patient demographics, tumor morphology, extent of resection, molecular pathology, and oncological therapy.Entities:
Keywords: glioblastoma; mean platelet volume; platelet count; progression; ratio
Year: 2021 PMID: 34178693 PMCID: PMC8221069 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.695316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Cutoff points of Mean Platelet Volume/Platelet Count ratio for dichotomization using log-rank test split regarding the progression of glioblastoma.
| Cut-Off | Number (Low-/High-MPV/PC Ratio Group) |
|
|---|---|---|
| ≤/>0.0585 | 170/22 | 0.029 |
| ≤/>0.0580 | 168/24 | 0.025 |
|
|
|
|
| ≤/>0.0570 | 163/29 | 0.12 |
| ≤/>0.0565 | 161/31 | 0.11 |
| ≤/>0.0560 | 158/34 | 0.08 |
| ≤/>0.0555 | 155/37 | 0.06 |
| ≤/>0.0550 | 153/39 | 0.12 |
| ≤/>0.0545 | 151/41 | 0.09 |
| ≤/>0.0540 | 150/42 | 0.14 |
MPV, Mean Platelet Volume; PC, Platelet Count.
The bolded text shows the optimal cut-off point.
Comparison of low- versus high-Mean Platelet Volume/Platelet Count ratio group (using Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) and independent t-test).
| Characteristics | High-MPV/PC Ratio (28/191; 14.7%) | Low-MPV/PC Ratio (163/191; 85.3%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| ≤65 | 12 (42.9%) | 103 (63.2%) | |
| >65 | 16 (57.1%) | 60 (36.8%) | 0.06 |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 6 (21.4%) | 66 (40.5%) | |
| Male | 22 (78.6%) | 97 (59.5%) | 0.06 |
| Body mass index (mean ± SD) | 25.96 ± 3.7 | 28.15 ± 16.00 | 0.49 |
| Preoperative KPS | |||
| ≥70 | 27 (96.4%) | 158 (96.9%) | |
| <70 | 1 (3.6%) | 5 (3.6%) | 0.99 |
| Secondary malignant neoplasm | |||
| Present | 2 (7.1%) | 14 (8.6%) | |
| Absent | 26 (92.9%) | 149 (91.4%) | 0.99 |
| Dexamethasone intake | |||
| ≥7 days | 10 (35.7%) | 86 (53.1%) | |
| <7 days | 18 (64.3%) | 76 (46.9%) | 0.31 |
| Tumor area (mean ± SD), mm2 | 1353.99 ± 1113.8 | 1399.16 ± 947.1 | 0.84 |
| Peritumoral edema (mean ± SD), mm | 24.8 ± 13.4 | 22.9 ± 10.4 | 0.33 |
| Sawaya | |||
| 1 | 3 (10.7%) | 23 (14.1%) | |
| ≥2 | 25 (89.3%) | 140 (85.9%) | 0.77 |
| Extent of resection | |||
| GTR | 19 (67.8%) | 127 (77.9%) | |
| STR | 9 (32.1%) | 36 (22.1%) | 0.24 |
| IDH-1 mutation (available in 181 patients) | 1/26 (3.8%) | 15/155 (9.7%) | 0.48 |
| MGMT promoter hypermethylation (available in 187 patients) | 13/28 (46.4%) | 84/159 (52.8%) | 0.55 |
| MIB-I labeling index (mean ± SD), | 18.33 ± 7.76 | 15.96 ± 7.38 | 0.15 |
MPV, Mean Platelet Volume; PC, Platelet Count; SD, Standard deviation; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; GTR, Gross total resection; STR, Subtotal resection; IDH-1, Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1; MGMT, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; MIB-1, Molecular Immunology Borstel-1.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of cumulative progression-free survival stratified by the parameters high-MPV/PC ratio (blue line) and low-MPV/PC ratio (green line). Censored patients (progression-free at last follow-up) are indicated on the curves. The time axis is right-censored at 30 months. p = 0.013 (log-rank test).
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of progression-free survival.
| Entire Cohort | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI |
|
| High-MPV/PC ratio | 1.61 | 1.01–2.57 | 0.044 |
| Age > 65 years | 1.23 | 0.84–1.79 | 0.29 |
| KPS ≤ 70 | 2.26 | 0.81–6.29 | 0.12 |
| Unmethylated MGMT promotor | 2.26 | 1.56–3.28 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| High-MPV/PC ratio | 1.60 | 1.02-2.52 | 0.042 |
| Age > 65 years | 1.29 | 0.88-1.90 | 0.19 |
| KPS ≤ 70 | 1.86 | 0.66-5.19 | 0.24 |
| Unmethylated MGMT promotor | 2.52 | 1.71-3.73 | <0.001 |
CI, Confidence interval; MPV, Mean Platelet Volume; PC, Platelet Count; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; MGMT, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase.
Figure 2Functionality according to the Karnofsky Performance Status among the MPV/PC ratio groups. Violin plots depicting the degree of functionality according to the Karnofsky Performance Status in the period from admission to the follow-up examination at 6 months stratified by the parameters high-MPV/PC ratio (blue) and low-MPV/PC ratio (green). Violin plots shows mean and distribution of Karnofsky Performance Status. The thick black lines are the median values. (p-values of the Student’s t-test).