| Literature DB >> 34178648 |
Qianhui Gu1,2,3, Jing Li3, Zhuolin Chen1, Jie Zhang2, Hui Shen2, Xiaobing Miao1, Ying Zhou2, Xiaohong Xu2, Song He1.
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that programmed death ligand-2 (PD-L2) constitutes an important antitumor immune response. Here, we investigated the relationship between PD-L2 expression and clinicopathological features in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immunohistochemistry showed that positive expression of PD-L2 was observed in 45 of 181 newly diagnosed patients, including 14 cases with expression exclusively on tumor cells (TCs) and 31 cases with the expression on both TCs and immune cells (ICs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). In 21 recurrent patients, positive expression of PD-L2 was present in six cases, including two cases with expression exclusively on TCs, and four cases with the expression on both TCs and ICs in the TME. Patients with PD-L2 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% exhibited a better ECOG performance status (PS) (ECOG PS score <2, P = 0.041), lower international prognostic index (IPI) score (P < 0.001), and early Ann Arbor stage (Ann Arbor stage I or II, P = 0.010). Similarly, patients with PD-L2 immune proportion score (IPS) ≥1% also exhibited a better ECOG PS (ECOG PS score < 2, P = 0.006) and lower IPI score (P = 0.001). Survival analysis showed that patients with PD-L2 TPS ≥1% exhibited prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). However, survival analysis showed no prognostic significance based on expression of PD-L2 on ICs in the TME. TC PD-L2 expression was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.041) and PFS (P = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TC PD-L2 expression was an independent prognostic risk factor for PFS (P = 0.013), but not for OS (P = 0.249). Furthermore, we found that higher TC and IC PD-L2 expression was associated with higher objective response rate (ORR). Moreover, we demonstrated that the expression level of PD-L2 was positively correlated with the expression status of M1 macrophage markers CD86. Our findings highlight PD-L2 as a promising therapeutic target in DLBCL.Entities:
Keywords: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; immunohistochemistry; overall survival; programmed death ligand-2; progression-free survival
Year: 2021 PMID: 34178648 PMCID: PMC8222690 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Immunohistochemistry staining of PD-L2 in DLBCL. (A) PD-L2 negative staining (magnification ×40). (B) PD-L2 positive staining (magnification ×40). In (B), arrows indicate PD-L2 expression on TCs (black arrows) and ICs in the TME (red arrows).
The number and positive rate of tumor cell PD-L2 in newly diagnosed and recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.
| Tumor cell | ||
|---|---|---|
| newly diagnosed patients | relapsed patients | |
| TPS < 1% | 136 | 15 |
| TPS 1–49% | 35 | 5 |
| TPS ≥ 50% | 10 | 1 |
| Positive rate(TPS ≥ 1%) | 24.86% | 28.57% |
The number and positive rate of tumor microenvironment PD-L2 in newly diagnosed and recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.
| Tumor microenvironment | ||
|---|---|---|
| newly diagnosed patients | relapsed patients | |
| IPS < 1% | 150 | 17 |
| IPS 1–49% | 27 | 3 |
| IPS ≥ 50% | 4 | 1 |
| Positive rate(IPS ≥ 1%) | 17.13% | 19.05% |
Relationship between clinicopathological features and PD-L2 expression in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients.
| Clinicopathological parameters | n | Tumor cells | P value | Immune cells in the TME | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| negative | positive | negative | positive | ||||
| Gender | 0.824 | 0.833 | |||||
| Male | 79 | 60 | 19 | 66 | 13 | ||
| Female | 102 | 76 | 26 | 84 | 18 | ||
| Age(year) | 0.620 | 0.268 | |||||
| <60 years | 55 | 40 | 15 | 43 | 12 | ||
| ≥60 years | 126 | 96 | 30 | 107 | 19 | ||
| Extra nodal invasion | 0.136 | 0.198 | |||||
| <2 | 116 | 83 | 33 | 93 | 23 | ||
| ≥2 | 65 | 53 | 12 | 57 | 8 | ||
| Tumor size | 0.503 | 0.517 | |||||
| <10 cm | 152 | 116 | 36 | 126 | 26 | ||
| ≥10 cm | 18 | 15 | 3 | 16 | 2 | ||
| Hans classification | 0.932 | 0.513 | |||||
| Non-GCB | 144 | 108 | 36 | 118 | 26 | ||
| GCB | 37 | 28 | 9 | 32 | 5 | ||
| ECOG PS | 0.041 | 0.006 | |||||
| <2 score | 37 | 23 | 14 | 25 | 12 | ||
| ≥2 score | 144 | 113 | 31 | 125 | 19 | ||
| B symptom | 0.512 | 0.804 | |||||
| Absent | 160 | 119 | 41 | 133 | 27 | ||
| Present | 21 | 17 | 4 | 17 | 4 | ||
| Ann Arbor stage | 0.010 | 0.051 | |||||
| I + II | 71 | 46 | 25 | 54 | 17 | ||
| III + IV | 110 | 90 | 20 | 96 | 14 | ||
| IPI score | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| 0–2 | 55 | 30 | 25 | 38 | 17 | ||
| 3–5 | 126 | 106 | 20 | 112 | 14 | ||
| LDH | 0.104 | 0.480 | |||||
| <211 U/L | 44 | 29 | 15 | 38 | 6 | ||
| ≥211 U/L | 137 | 107 | 30 | 112 | 25 | ||
|
| 0.737 | 0.676 | |||||
| <4 mg/L | 58 | 46 | 12 | 49 | 9 | ||
| ≥4 mg/L | 25 | 19 | 6 | 22 | 3 | ||
| ALB | 0.173 | 0.513 | |||||
| <35 g/L | 37 | 31 | 6 | 32 | 5 | ||
| ≥35 g/L | 144 | 105 | 39 | 118 | 26 | ||
| EBER | 0.041 | 0.019 | |||||
| negative | 142 | 107 | 35 | 118 | 24 | ||
| positive | 14 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | ||
| Bcl-6 | 0.648 | 0.221 | |||||
| negative | 24 | 19 | 5 | 22 | 2 | ||
| positive | 135 | 101 | 34 | 110 | 25 | ||
| C-myc | 0.928 | 0.903 | |||||
| negative | 18 | 13 | 5 | 14 | 4 | ||
| positive | 86 | 63 | 23 | 68 | 18 | ||
| Bcl-2 | 0.313 | 0.170 | |||||
| negative | 28 | 19 | 9 | 20 | 8 | ||
| positive | 84 | 65 | 19 | 70 | 14 | ||
| CD20 | 0.993 | 0.722 | |||||
| negative | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 1 | ||
| positive | 173 | 130 | 43 | 143 | 30 | ||
Figure 2Relationship between TC PD-L2 (+) and overall survival (A) and progression free survival (B) curves. Relationship between IC PD-L2 (+) and overall survival (C) and progression free survival (D) curves in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Relationship between PD-L2 mRNA level and overall survival of DLBCL. (E) GSE10846, (F) GSE32918.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological factors associated with overall survival in DLBCL patients.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(95%CI) | P value | HR(95%CI) | P value | |
| Age | 2.279 (1.391–3.736) | 0.001 | – | – |
| Extra nodal invasion | 1.695 (1.125–2.554) | 0.012 | – | – |
| ECOG PS | 2.494 (1.361–4.571) | 0.003 | – | – |
| Ann Arbor stage | 2.358 (1.516–3.668) | <0.001 | – | – |
| LDH | 2.217 (1.311–3.749) | 0.003 | – | – |
| IPI score | 3.259 (1.926–5.514) | <0.001 | 0.452 (0.258–0.794) | 0.006 |
| B symptom | 5.006 (2.957–8.476) | <0.001 | 0.290 (0.169–0.496) | <0.001 |
| ALB | 0.283 (0.179–0.447) | <0.001 | 2.396 (1.488–3.859) | <0.001 |
| PD-L2(TPS ≥ 1%) | 0.592 (0.358–0.978) | 0.041 | 0.739 (0.442–1.236) | 0.249 |
Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological factors associated with progression free survival in DLBCL patients.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age | 1.795 (1.189–2.711) | 0.005 | – | – |
| Extra nodal invasion | 1.636 (1.132–2.365) | 0.009 | – | – |
| ECOG PS | 1.830 (1.107–3.026) | 0.018 | – | – |
| Ann Arbor stage | 2.096 (1.409–3.119) | <0.001 | – | – |
| LDH | 2.097 (1.293–3.401) | 0.003 | – | – |
| IPI score | 2.632 (1.665–4.162) | <0.001 | 0.568 (0.347–0.930) | 0.024 |
| B symptom | 2.945 (1.793–4.838) | <0.001 | 0.466 (0.280–0.775) | 0.003 |
| ALB | 0.342 (0.226–0.518) | <0.001 | 2.192 (1.422–3.380) | <0.001 |
| PD-L2(TPS ≥ 1%) | 0.447 (0.278–0.719) | 0.001 | 0.540 (0.332–0.879) | 0.013 |
Figure 3Objective response rates of TC (A)/IC (B) PD-L2 (+) and PD-L2 (−) patients receiving CHOP regimen. Objective response rates of TC (C)/IC (D) PD-L2 (+) and PD-L2 (-) patients receiving R-CHOP regimen.
Figure 4Content of 22 immune cells in 29 DLBCL samples from TCGA database (A). Analysis of the difference of 22 immune cells between high and low expression groups of PD-L2 mRNA (B).
Figure 5Representative photomicrographs of multiplex immunofluorescence. DAPI: nuclear staining (A), CD68 staining (B), PD-L2 staining (C), Merge (CD68: red signal; PD-L2: green signal) (D). The positive rate of PD-L2 in macrophages (E). Relationship between macrophage PD-L2 (+) and overall survival (F) and progression free survival (G) curves in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Figure 6Low density of TC PD-L2 and M1 macrophages (A–D). High density of TC PD-L2 and M1 macrophages (E–H). DAPI: nuclear staining (A, E), CD86 staining (B, F), PD-L2 staining (C, G) Merge, (D, H).
Figure 7Relationship between the expression of TC PD-L2 and M1 macrophages in tumor tissues.