| Literature DB >> 34178154 |
Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo1,2, Fabio Morotti1, Nathalia Covre da Silva1, Tamires Korchovei Sanches1, Marcelo M Seneda1.
Abstract
Reproductive biotechniques such as embryo production are important tools to increase the reproductive performance in cattle in a short time. In this context, the antral follicle count (AFC), which reflects the population of antral follicles present in an ovary, has been indicated as an important phenotypic characteristic related to female fertility and closely correlated to the performance of in vivo and in vitro embryo production (IVEP). A positive correlation was evidenced between AFC and oocyte retrieval by ovum pick up (OPU) sessions and and with the number of embryos produced. Several studies have reported that females with a high AFC had greater embryo yields compared to those with medium and low AFC. However, controversial results were obtained by studies conducted in different bovine breeds. Many conflicting data may be due to the differences in the experimental design, particularly regarding the classification of animals in AFC groups, subspecies particularities, herd aptitude or even issues related to animal management. Therefore, aspects such as the choice of donor, type of aspirated follicles and the stage of follicular wave need to be clarified. Thus, this text aims to discuss the use of AFC as a reproductive tool and its applications in the in vivo and in vitro production of embryos, besides describing consistent results and new challenges regarding AFC and embryo production.Entities:
Keywords: antral follicle count, Bos taurus; Bos indicus; cow; fertility
Year: 2018 PMID: 34178154 PMCID: PMC8202465 DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Reprod ISSN: 1806-9614 Impact factor: 1.807
Results (mean ± SD) from studies comparing in vitro embryo production in Bos taurus, Bos indicus and Bos indicus-taurus (crossbred) between high and low AFC groups.
| Author | type | AFC |
Animals
|
PU
|
COC’s
|
Blastocyst
| Blastocyst rate % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Low
|
68
| --- | 7.5a | 1.3a | 29.6 |
|
High
|
37
| --- | 29.5b | 4.9b | 30.9 | ||
|
|
|
Low
|
20
| 20 | 5.8 ± 3.4A | 0.5 ± 0.8A | 9.5A |
|
High
|
20
| 20 | 36.9 ± 13.7B | 6.1 ± 4.5B | 16.5B | ||
|
|
|
Low
|
19
| 19 | 3.8 ± 1.1α | 0.6 ± 0.6α | 13.0α |
|
High
|
22
| 22 | 40.4 ± 10.6β | 18.4 ± 6.7β | 41.9β | ||
|
|
|
Low
|
18
| 216 | 10.8 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 33.9 |
|
High
|
18
| 216 | 21.2 ± 1.0 | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 34.2 | ||
|
|
|
Low
|
356
| --- | 536 (total) | 203 (total) | 38.6 |
|
High
|
356
| --- | 617 (total) | 251 (total) | 40.6 |
Animals submitted to OPU only once.
Animals submitted to OPU more than once.
Animals submitted to postmortem ovarian aspiration. a,b/A,B/α,β For the same author and variable were different (P ≤ 0.05) between the AFCs groups. Adapted from Ireland ; Silva-Santos ; Santos ; Monteiro and Rosa .
Results (mean ± SD) from studies comparing in vivo embryo production in Bos taurus and Bos indicus-taurus (crossbred) between high and low AFC groups.
| Author | Animals | Number of follicles | Number of flushes | Transferable embryos/ animals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Low
|
21
| 3.8 ± 0.8a |
|
High
|
19
| 5.4 ± 1.3b | ||
|
|
|
Low
|
20
| 1.9 ± 2.1A |
|
High
|
20
| 6.9 ± 5.3B |
The same female may have been superovulated and collected up to twice.
One single collection per animal. a,b/A,BFor the same author were different (P ≤ 0.05) between the AFCs groups. Adapted from Ireland and Silva-Santos .
Reproductive performance of females with high or low follicle count (AFC) after artificial insemination.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| Low AFC (≤ 15 follicles) | 84 |
| High AFC (≥ 25 follicles) | 94 | |
|
| Low (≤ 12 follicles) | 51.85 |
| High AFC (≥ 30 follicles) | 44.73 | |
|
| Low AFC (≤ 10 follicles) | 58,6 |
| High AFC (≥ 25 folículos) | 51,9 |
Adapted from Mossa ; Mendonça and Santos .