| Literature DB >> 34177800 |
Chan Liu1, Xiao-Rong Zhou2, Mu-Yao Ye3, Xiang-Qing Xu3, Yu-Wei Zhang1, Hong Liu1, Xian-Zhe Huang4.
Abstract
Objective: Hyperuricemia (HUA) is strongly associated with abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance (IR). However, the precise molecular mechanism of HUA-induced IR is still unclear. Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) has been shown to induce IR in type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study was designed to clarify the relationship between RBP4 and HUA-induced IR and its potential mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: IRS/PI3K/Akt; hyperuricemia; insulin receptor substrate; insulin resistance; retinol binding protein 4
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34177800 PMCID: PMC8223863 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.653819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
The clinical parameters of patients with hyperuricemia and controls.
| Variable | CON (n = 30) | HUA (n = 30) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 51.80 ± 10.28 | 55.40 ± 15.32 |
| Sex (M/F) | 18/12 | 25/5 |
| Height | 165.63 ± 7.55 | 165.20 ± 7.53 |
| Weight | 62.54 ± 10.63 | 66.17 ± 9.27 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.70 ± 2.93 | 24.21 ± 2.62* |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 131.80 ± 16.89 | 142.97 ± 16.58 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 75.47 ± 11.65 | 80.13 ± 12.93 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 311.11 ± 85.59 | 588.37 ± 90.57** |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 96.27 ± 21.91 | 124.75 ± 4.36** |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.21 (2.77–6.10) | 4.89 (3.51–6.45)* |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.95 (0.76–6.13) | 2.48 (0.89–5.22)* |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.04 ± 0.20 | 1.02 ± 0.22 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.88 ± 0.65 | 3.17 ± 0.64 |
| FIns (mmol/L) | 6.86 (1.87–19.37) | 11.22 (3.8–26.44)** |
| HOMA-IR | 1.52 (0.39–4.99) | 2.46 (0.62–6.82)** |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 4.78 ± 0.68 | 4.86 ± 0.65 |
BMI, body mass index; CON, control groups; Cr, creatinine; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FIns, fasting insulin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, HOMA insulin resistance index; HUA, hyperuricemia; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; UA, uric acid. Data are expressed as means ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Correlation between plasma RBP4 and clinical indicators.
| Clinical indicators | RBP4 | |
|---|---|---|
| R | P-value | |
| UA (μmol/L) | 0.518 | 0.008** |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 0.610 | 0.000** |
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.872 | 0.031* |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.337 | 0.018* |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.078 | 0.680 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | -0.164 | 0.369 |
| FIns (mmol/L) | 0.260 | 0.047* |
| HOMA-IR | 0.205 | 0.028* |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 0.284 | 0.129 |
| BMI | 0.210 | 0.275 |
BMI, body mass index; Cr, creatinine; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FIns, fasting insulin; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, HOMA insulin resistance index; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; UA, uric acid. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Analysis for correlated factors of plasma RBP4.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| UA (μmol/) | 0.527 | 0.002** |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 0.350 | 0.000** |
| HOMA-IR | 0.624 | 0.032* |
| FIns (mmol/L) | 0.718 | 0.046* |
Cr, creatinine; FIns, fasting insulin; HOMA-IR, HOMA insulin resistance index; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; UA, uric acid. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Correlation between plasma RBP4 and clinical indicators in HUA rats.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| UA (μmol/L) | 0.609 | 0.047* |
| FIns (mmol/L) | −0.472 | 0.285 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.715 | 0.041* |
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.20 | 0.965 |
| Hs-CRP (mg/L) | −0.129 | 0.784 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.262 | 0.035* |
FIns, fasting insulin; HOMA-IR, HOMA insulin resistance index; Hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HUA, hyperuricemia; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; UA, uric acid. *P < 0.05.
Figure 1The levels of RBP4 in patients with HUA and HUA rats. (A) The levels of plasma RBP4 in thirty patients with hyperuricemia (HUA) and thirty healthy controls (CON). (B) Twenty-eight weeks male Sprague–Dawley rats were subjected to high yeast diet and potassium oxonate (300 mg/kg, daily, intraperitoneally) for eight weeks along with adenine (100 mg/kg, by gastrogavage) once daily from the fifth week to induced HUA in rats (HUA, n = 10). Normal diet and vehicle solutions were used in the control group (CON, n = 10). The levels of plasma RBP4 in HUA and CON rats were measured by the specific Elisa kit. (C) About 30 μg protein were loaded and the expression of RBP4 in the adipose tissue of rats was determined by western blot (left panel). The representative views are shown in the left panel and densitrometric quantification analysis for RBP4 is shown in the right panel. (D) The mRNA expression of RBP4 in the adipose tissue of rats was determined by RT-PCR. Results are represented by mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Figure 2Glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance in HUA rats. (A) Glucose tolerance tests were performed to detect glucose tolerance in HUA and CON rats (n = 10 per group). (B) Insulin tolerance tests were performed to detect glucose tolerance in HUA and control rats. (C) About 30 μg protein were loaded and the expression of p-IRS-1 (PY896), p-IRS-2 (S731), p-PI3K (P85), and p-Akt (Ser473) were measured by Western blot in the adipose tissue of HUA and CON rats. The representative views are shown in the left panel and densitrometric quantification analysis for RBP4 is shown in the right panel. Results are represented by mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Figure 3The effects of RBP4 on glucose uptake and phosphorylation of IRS/PI3K/Akt in UA-induced 3T3-L1 adipocytes. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with UA (10 mg/dl), RBP4 siRNA (50nM), or UA+RBP4 siRNA for 48h. (A) About 30 μg protein were loaded and the expression of RBP4 was examined by western blot. The representative views are shown in the left panel and densitrometric quantification analysis for RBP4 is shown in the right panel. (B) The mRNA expression of RBP4 was determined by RT-PCR. (C) Glucose uptake was determined by a glucose test kit. (D) About 30 μg protein were loaded and the expression of p-IRS-1 (PY896), p-IRS-2 (S731), p-PI3K (P85), and p-Akt (Ser473) were determined by western blot. The representative views are shown in the left panel and densitrometric quantification analysis for RBP4 is shown in the right panel. Results are represented by mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. NS, not significant. All the experiments were repeated three times.