| Literature DB >> 34177797 |
Xiao Zhang1, Zhao Huangfu2, Fangxin Shi1, Zhen Xiao1,3.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of using the multiple of the median (MoM) of β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels in patients with preeclampsia (PE) and healthy pregnant women.Entities:
Keywords: early second trimester; meta-analysis; prediction; preeclampsia; β-hCG MoM levels
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34177797 PMCID: PMC8223748 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.619530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1Flow chart showing the results of the search strategy.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Reference(first author) | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Detection method | Detection period, weeks | Number | Maternal age, years mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile ranges) |
| NOS score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| case | control | size | sam-ple | case/control | case | control | |||||||
| Long W | 2018 | China | Asian | TRFIA | 15-20 | 15-20 | large | 1369 | 198/1171 | 27.7 ± 3.6 | 26.6 ± 3.5 | 0.09 | 6 |
| Papastefanou I | 2018 | Germany | Caucasians | ELISA | 11-14 | 11-14 | small | 277 | 12/265 | 31.9 ± 3.7 | 31 ± 4.2 | 0.958 | 7 |
| Yu N | 2017 | China | Asian | TRFIA | 11-13+6 | 11-13+6 | large | 662 | 462/200 | 30.2 ± 4.6 | 28.6 ± 2.3 | 0.536 | 7 |
| Kim SY | 2016 | Korea | Asian | TRFIA | 15-20 | 15-20 | small | 118 | 34/84 | 34.1(32.7-36.0) | 33.0(31.0-35.3) | >0.05 | 6 |
| Zheng QZ | 2016 | China | Asian | ELISA | 15-20 | 15-20 | small | 259 | 63/196 | 31.8 ± 4.3 | 31.5 ± 7.5 | 0.013 | 6 |
| Crovetto F | 2015 | Spain | Caucasians | DELFIA | 10.6 ± 3.9 | 10.6 ± 3.9 | small | 340 | 40/300 | 33.9 ± 6.4 | 32.7 ± 4.7 | <0.05 | 7 |
| Crovetto F | 2014 | Spain | Caucasians | DELFIA | 10.1(9.1-10.6) | 10.2(9-10.6) | large | 9462 | 303/9159 | 32.3 ± 6.1 | 31.7 ± 5.3 | <0.001 | 8 |
| Karahasanovic A | 2014 | Denmark | Caucasians | ELISA | 11.1(8-14) | 11(8-11) | small | 249 | 161/88 | 30.9(18.8-41.2) | 28.1(21.1-40.7) | <0.05 | 7 |
| Ozdamar O | 2014 | Turkey | Caucasians | UA | 12.4 ± 0.6 | 12.4 ± 0.7 | small | 240 | 60/180 | 29.3 ± 5.7 | 28.1 ± 4.3 | 0.882 | 6 |
| Teixeira C | 2014 | Portugal | Caucasians | DELFIA | 9-13+6 | 9-13+6 | large | 4799 | 140/4659 | 31.0(27.7-33.6) | 29.9(25.8-33.0) | >0.05 | 6 |
| Lai J | 2013 | UK | Caucasians | DELFIA | 11-13+6 | 11-13+6 | small | 300 | 50/250 | 29.8(24.2-33.8) | 31.2(27.6-34.9) | >0.05 | 7 |
| Suri S | 2013 | UK | Caucasians | DELFIA | 11-14 | 11-14 | small | 56 | 14/42 | NR | NR | NS | 7 |
| Kuc S | 2013 | Netherlands | Caucasians | DELFIA | 12.0 ± 1.2 | 12.5 ± 0.7 | large | 667 | 167/500 | 33.2 ± 4.8 | 32.6 ± 3.7 | NS | 6 |
| Wortelboer EJ | 2010 | Netherlands | Caucasians | DELFIA | 8-13+6 | 8-13+6 | large | 568 | 88/480 | 34.6(31.0-37.3) | 36.0(33.3-38.2) | 0.93 | 7 |
| Staboulidou I | 2009 | UK | Caucasians | NR | 11-13 | 11-13 | large | 2029 | 165/1864 | 31.9 ± 7.0 | 32.0 ± 5.9 | NS | 6 |
| Spencer K | 2006 | UK | Caucasians | ELISA | 11-13+6 | 11-13+6 | small | 168 | 24/144 | NR | NR | 0.003 | 7 |
| Spencer K | 2005 | UK | Caucasians | ELISA | 11-13+6 | 11-13+6 | large | 4063 | 64/3999 | 29(17-44) | 30(16-47) | 0.266 | 6 |
| Tsai MS | 2002 | Taiwan | Asian | ELISA | 10-13 | 10-13 | large | 711 | 46/665 | 30(20-43) | NR | NS | 6 |
| Lee LC | 2000 | Taiwan | Asian | MEIA | 15-20 | 15-20 | large | 1052 | 95/957 | 30.0 ± 4.7 | 28.6 ± 4.1 | <0.001 | 6 |
| Raty R | 1999 | Finland | Caucasians | TRFIA | 16.4 ± 1.5 | 15.9 ± 1.2 | small | 343 | 10/282 | 26.2 ± 3.0 | 29.7 ± 3.5 | >0.05 | 7 |
| Luckas M | 1998 | UK | Caucasians | RIA | 15-18 | 15-18 | small | 406 | 19/387 | 22 ± 5.4 | 25.1 ± 5.6 | 0.03 | 6 |
DELFIA, Dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluoroimmunoassay; UA, ultrasonographic assessment; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; MEIA, microparticle enzyme immunoassay; TRFIA, time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay; RIA,radioimmunoassay; TSI, two-site immunometric assay; CLIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay; NR, not reported; NS, no significance.
Figure 2Random-effect model forest plot for the association between serum β-hCG MoM levels and PE.
Figure 3Random-effect forest plot for the subgroup analysis according to (A) sample size, (B) ethnicity, (C) diagnostic criteria for PE, (D) detection period.
Figure 4Random-effect forest plot for the subgroup analysis for the association between serum β-hCG MoM levels in the early second trimester and PE according to (A) sample size, (B) ethnicity, (C) diagnostic criteria for PE.
Figure 5Meta-regression analysis on (A) ethnicity, (B) country, (C) diagnostic criteria for PE, (D) detection method, (E) sample size, (F) year of publication and (G) detection period on the basis of the 21 included case-control.
Meta-regression analysis of potential source of heterogeneity.
| Heterogeneity factors | Coefficient | SE | t |
| 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | UL | |||||
| Year of publication | -0.027 | 0.009 | -3.09 | 0.006 | -0.045 | -0.009 |
| Ethnicity | 0.095 | 0.137 | 0.69 | 0.499 | -0.193 | 0.382 |
| Country | 0.030 | 0.019 | 1.57 | 0.133 | -0.010 | 0.069 |
| Diagnostic criteria for PE | -0.027 | 0.133 | -0.21 | 0.839 | -0.310 | 0.251 |
| Detection method | 0.063 | 0.049 | 1.28 | 0.216 | -0.040 | 0.166 |
| Detection period | -0.364 | 0.115 | -3.16 | 0.005 | -0.605 | -0.123 |
| Sample size | -0.000 | 0.000 | -0.43 | 0.674 | -0.000 | 0.000 |
LL, Lower limit; UL, upper limit.
Figure 6(A) Sensitivity analysis of the summary odds ratio coefficients on the difference of free β-hCG MoM values between PE and control subjects. (B) Funnel plot of publication biases on the difference of free β-hCG MoM values between PE and control subjects. (C) Galbraith plot of publication biases on the difference of free β-hCG MoM values between PE and control subjects.