| Literature DB >> 34177754 |
Weiqi Fu1,2, Huijian Ge1, Gang Luo1, Xiangyu Meng1, Jiejun Wang1, Hengwei Jin1, Youxiang Li1.
Abstract
Background: Treatment of unruptured vertebral artery aneurysm involving posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) is challenging. The experience of pipeline embolization device (PED) therapy for these lesions is still limited. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the PED for unruptured vertebral artery aneurysm involving PICA.Entities:
Keywords: dissecting aneurysms; pica; pipeline embolization device; posterior circulation aneurysms; vertebral artery
Year: 2021 PMID: 34177754 PMCID: PMC8222993 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.622457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Basic information and aneurysm characteristics.
| Patients | 32 | |
| Aneurysms | 32 | 32 |
| Genders (males) | 23 | 71.9% |
| Age (years) | 52 (17–67) | ±9.37 |
| Hypertension | 14 | 43.8% |
| Diabetes | 4 | 12.5% |
| Smoking | 7 | 21.9% |
| Headache | 14 | 43.8% |
| Dizziness | 6 | 18.8% |
| Ataxia | 2 | 6.3% |
| Dysphagia | 2 | 6.3% |
| Vomiting | 2 | 6.3% |
| Incidence | 6 | 18.8% |
| Fusiform | 23 | 71.9% |
| Saccular | 9 | 28.1% |
| Length (mm) | 13.9 (7–27) | ±5.18 |
| Width (mm) | 8.9 (4-18) | ±3.67 |
| Co-dominant | 20 | 62.5% |
| Right | 9 | 28.1% |
| Left | 3 | 9.4% |
| MRS (0–2) | 32 | 100% |
| MRS (3–5) | 0 | 0 |
SD, Standard deviation; Ave, Average; VA, Vertebral artery; MRS, Modified Rankin Scale.
Patients, aneurysm and stent details.
| 1 | Male/58 | Fusiform | 11*20 mm | 3.7/3.2 mm | 4.0*35 |
| 2 | Male/51 | Fusiform | 9*12 mm | 3.3/3.1 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 3 | Female/54 | Fusiform | 6*15 mm | 3.4/3.3 mm | 3.5*20 |
| 4 | Male/55 | Fusiform | 8*15 mm | 3.3/2.8 mm | 3.75*35 |
| 5 | Male/54 | Fusiform | 6*11 mm | 3.2/3.1 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 6 | Male/52 | Saccular | 18*17 mm | 4.3/3.9 mm | 4.5*35 |
| 7 | Female/47 | Fusiform | 8*12 mm | 3.4/3.1 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 8 | Male/55 | Fusiform | 8*12 mm | 3.3/2.9 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 9 | Female/54 | Saccular | 15*17 mm | 3.6/3.3 mm | 4.0*35 |
| 10 | Female/30 | Saccular | 5*7 mm | 3.3/3.0 mm | 3.5*20 |
| 11 | Female/55 | Saccular | 11*12 mm | 3.6/3.1 mm | 3.75*25 |
| 12 | Female/67 | Saccular | 7*9 mm | 3.3/3.0 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 13 | Female/44 | Saccular | 8*10 mm | 3.2/3.1 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 14 | Female/54 | Fusiform | 4*8 mm | 3.8/3.1 mm | 4.0*25 |
| 15 | Male/52 | Saccular | 8*10 mm | 4.1/3.5 mm | 4.5*25 |
| 16 | Male/53 | Fusiform | 9*13 mm | 4.3/3.8 mm | 4.5*25 |
| 17 | Male/51 | Fusiform | 20*27 mm | 4.8/3.7 mm | 5.0*35 |
| 18 | Male/61 | Fusiform | 7*14 mm | 3.5/3.2 mm | 3.75*35 |
| 19 | Female/53 | Fusiform | 5*8 mm | 3.3/3.2 mm | 3.5*25 |
| 20 | Male/67 | Fusiform | 7*12 mm | 3.7/3.5 mm | 4.0*35 |
| 21 | Male/64 | Fusiform | 9*17 mm | 3.7/3.2 mm | 4.0*35 |
| 23 | Male/56 | Fusiform | 5*12 mm | 4.1/3.7 mm | 4.25*25 |
| 24 | Female/56 | Fusiform | 8*15 mm | 3.4/3.1 mm | 3.5*30 |
| 25 | Male/17 | Fusiform | 9*12 mm | 3.5/3.1 mm | 3.75*35 |
| 26 | Male/54 | Fusiform | 9*21 mm | 3.3/3.1 mm | 3.5*25 |
| 27 | Male/46 | Fusiform | 7*18 mm | 4.0/3.5 mm | 4.25*35 |
| 28 | Male/46 | Saccular | 6*8 mm | 3.1/2.9 mm | 3.25*35 |
| 29 | Male/55 | Saccular | 6*8 mm | 4.1/4.2 mm | 4.25*35 |
| 30 | Male/55 | Fusiform | 10*21 mm | 4.3/4.0 mm | 4.5*35/4.0*30 |
| 31 | Male/53 | Fusiform | 11*17 mm | 3.3/2.9 mm | 3.5*25 |
| 31 | Male/46 | Fusiform | 12*18 mm | 3.9/4.5 mm | 4.75*30 |
| 32 | Male/52 | Fusiform | 7*14 mm | 3.4/3.1 mm | 3.5*30 |
AN, Aneurysm.
Figure 1Fifty four year-old female with left vertebral artery aneurysm. (A) A 3-dimensional reconstruction image of a vertebral angiogram shows an irregular aneurysm involving PICA. (B) Non-subtracted oblique view shows PED in place and loosely filling coils. Follow-up frontal (C) and lateral (D) angiography shows the aneurysm is completely occluded and PICA remains patency.
Figure 2Seventeen year-old male with right vertebral aneurysm extending to basilar artery. (A) Preoperative frontal angiogram shows a giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm involving PICA. (B) Postoperative DynaCT indicates good opening of the PED and apposition. The 13-month follow-up frontal (C) and lateral (D) angiogram shows the aneurysm is incompletely occluded and the PICA is preserved.
Figure 3Fifty four year-old female with bilateral vertebral aneurysm. (A) Frontal angiogram of the left vertebral artery shows bilateral dissecting aneurysm and the left involved PCIA. (B) Non-subtracted frontal view shows bilateral PED in place. (C) The 25-month follow-up left (C) and right (D) angiogram indicates left vertebral artery is occluded at V3 segment and PICA remains patency through contralateral circulation.
Procedural details and follow-up outcomes.
| Procedural success | 32 (100%) |
| PED numbers | 33 |
| 1 | 31 (96.9%) |
| 2 | 1 (3.1%) |
| Adjunct coil deployment | 4 (12.5%) |
| Balloon angioplasty | 1 (3.1%) |
| Imaging follow-up available | 30 (93.8%) |
| Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) | 20 (66.7%) |
| Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) | 10 (33.3%) |
| Complete occlusion | 17 (56.7%) |
| Near-complete occlusion | 9 (30%) |
| Incomplete occlusion | 1 (3.3%) |
| Patency of PICA | 28 (93.3%) |
| PAO | 3 (10%) |
| Clinical follow-up available | 32 (100%) |
| 0–2 | 32 (100%) |
| 3–6 | 0 (0%) |
PED, Pipeline embolization device; PICA, Posterior inferior cerebellar artery; PAO, Parent artery occlusion; MRS, Modified Rankin Scale.