| Literature DB >> 34177670 |
Simon G D Ruffell1,2, Nige Netzband3, WaiFung Tsang4, Merlin Davies2, Matthew Butler4, James J H Rucker4, Luís Fernando Tófoli5, Emma Louise Dempster2, Allan H Young1, Celia J A Morgan2.
Abstract
Ayahuasca is a natural psychoactive brew, used in traditional ceremonies in the Amazon basin. Recent research has indicated that ayahuasca is pharmacologically safe and its use may be positively associated with improvements in psychiatric symptoms. The mechanistic effects of ayahuasca are yet to be fully established. In this prospective naturalistic study, 63 self-selected participants took part in ayahuasca ceremonies at a retreat centre in the Peruvian Amazon. Participants undertook the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Self-compassion Scale (SCS), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), as well as secondary measures, pre- and post-retreat and at 6-months. Participants also provided saliva samples for pre/post epigenetic analysis. Overall, a statistically significant decrease in BDI-II (13.9 vs. 6.1, p < 0.001), STAI (44.4 vs. 34.3 p < 0.001) scores, and CORE-OM scores were observed (37.3 vs. 22.3 p < 0.001) at post-retreat, as well as a concurrent increase in SCS (3.1 vs. 3.6, p < 0.001). Psychometric improvements were sustained, and on some measures values further decreased at 6-month follow-up, suggesting a potential for lasting therapeutic effects. Changes in memory valence were linked to the observed psychometric improvements. Epigenetic findings were equivocal, but indicated that further research in candidate genes, such as sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 (SIGMAR1), is warranted. This data adds to the literature supporting ayahuasca's possible positive impact on mental health when conducted in a ceremonial context. Further investigation into clinical samples, as well as greater analyses into the mechanistic action of ayahuasca is advised.Entities:
Keywords: DMT; ayahuasca; ceremony; epigenetic; mental health; psychedelic; retreat; trauma
Year: 2021 PMID: 34177670 PMCID: PMC8221532 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.687615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Inter-rater reliability statistics for the SCEPT by intraclass correlation coefficients.
| Total specific memories | 0.83 |
| Positive specific memories | 0.76 |
| Negative specific memories | 0.90 |
| Total general memories | 0.85 |
| Positive general memories | 0.76 |
| Negative general memories | 0.85 |
Bisulfite pyrosequencing assays.
| FKBP5 | GTTGGGATAATAATTTGGAGTTATAGTG | /5Biosg/CTACCAAATAACTCCTTAAA | GGAGTTATAGTGTAGGTTTT | chr6:35,558,488-35,558,515 |
| SIGMAR1 | GTGTGGGGATAGTGAGATTTAGAAT | /5Biosg/CCACCCTAAAACTCCCAACTT | GGGATAGTGAGATTTAGAATG | Chr9:34638039-34638081 |
Figure 1Changes in outcome scores over time. (A) Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). (B) State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)—Trait Anxiety Score. (C) Self Compassion Scale (SCS)—Changes in Total self-compassion (TSC) score. (D) Clinical Outcome Routine in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM): changes in mean CORE-OM Global Distress (GD) score [NS, non-significant (P > 0.05), ***p ≤ 0.001].
Summary of means and standard deviations for all scales and subscales.
| 14.4 (11.6) | 5.9 (7.6) | 0.87 | 4 (5.5) | 1.15 | |
| - Trait anxiety | 45 (15.1) | 34.3 (12.3) | 0.77 | 33.7 (10.6) | 0.87 |
| - State anxiety | 40.1 (13.4) | 28 (9.2) | 1.05 | 30.3 (8.8) | 0.86 |
| - Total | 3.1 (1.1) | 3.6 (0.8) | 0.57 | 3.8 (0.9) | 0.78 |
| - Self kindness | 3.1 (1.0) | 3.7 (0.8) | 0.67 | 4 (0.8) | 0.95 |
| - Self judgement | 3.2 (1.1) | 2.6 (1.1) | 0.56 | 2.4 (1) | 0.79 |
| - Common humanity | 3.3 (1) | 3.8 (0.9) | 0.46 | 3.8 (1) | 0.45 |
| - Isolation | 3 (1.2) | 2.4 (1.1) | 0.46 | 2.3 (1.1) | 0.63 |
| - Mindfulness | 3.5 (0.9) | 3.9 (0.8) | 0.46 | 4.1 (0.8) | 0.72 |
| - Over-identification | 3.1 (1.1) | 2.6 (1.1) | 0.42 | 2.5 (1.2) | 0.54 |
| - Global distress | 39.1 (24.4) | 21.7 (18.1) | 0.81 | 21.5 (17.4) | 0.83 |
| - Global distress minus risk | 37.5 (22.9) | 21.3 (17.8) | 0.79 | 21.1 (16.7) | 0.82 |
| - Subjective well-being | 5.6 (4.4) | 2.9 (3.2) | 0.69 | 3.1 (3.2) | 0.65 |
| - Problem/symptoms | 18 (10.8) | 10.8 (9.5) | 0.71 | 9.8 (8.7) | 0.84 |
| - Life functioning | 14 (9) | 7.4 (6.6) | 0.83 | 8.2 (6.1) | 0.75 |
| - Risk/harm | 1.6 (2.8) | 0.4 (0.9) | 0.59 | 0.5 (1.2) | 0.52 |
| - Specific | 2.5 (1.9) | 2.9 (1.8) | 2.3 (1.5) | ||
| - General | 8.0 (2.1) | 7.8 (1.7) | 8.3 (2.0) | ||
| - Omissions | 0.5 (1.1) | 0.3 (1) | 0.5 (1.6) | ||
| - Total | 6.5 (2.2) | 7 (2.1) | 7.2 (2) | ||
| - Specific | 1.7 (1.6) | 2.1 (1.6) | 1.8 (1.3) | ||
| - General | 4.8 (1.9) | 4.9 (1.9) | 5.5 (2.1) | ||
| - Total | 4.2 (1.9) | 3.8 (1.9) | 3.3 (1.6) | ||
| - Specific | 0.8 (0.9) | 0.9 (1.0) | 0.5 (0.7) | ||
| - General | 3.4 (1.6) | 2.9 (1.7) | 2.8 (1.4) | ||
| - Total | 48.3 (17.6) | – | – | ||
| - Physical abuse | 8.1 (3.7) | – | – | ||
| - Sexual abuse | 7.8 (5.7) | – | – | ||
| - Emotional neglect | 12.5 (5.3) | – | – | ||
| - Physical neglect | 8.5 (3.8) | – | – | ||
| - Minimisation | 0.1 (0.4) | – | – | ||
| - Total | – | 115.1 (30.1) | – | ||
| - Mystical experience | – | 57.6 (17.3) | – | ||
| - Positive mood | – | 24.0 (6.2) | – | ||
| - Transcendence | – | 22.1 (6.3) | – | ||
| - Ineffability | – | 11.8 (3.6) | – | ||
Effect sizes (D) for four main outcome measures are reported as Cohen's d. P-values obtained from repeated ANOVAs are corrected for multiple comparisons through Bonferroni post-hoc analysis.
Figure 2Sentence Completion for Events from the Past Test (SCEPT): Changes in SCEPT negative valanced memory scores over time [NS, non-significant (P > 0.05), **p ≤ 0.01].
Correlation coefficients vs. BDI-II change scores at post-retreat and 6 month follow-up.
| Total score | 0.189 (0.148) | −0.250 (0.208) | ||
| Physical abuse | −0.119 (0.354) | −0.306 (0.095) | 0.045 (0.742) | −0.061 (0.764) |
| Sexual abuse | −0.345 (0.057) | −0.077 (0.570) | 0.071 (0.726) | |
| Emotional neglect | −0.180 (0.333) | −0.376 (0.053) | ||
| Physical neglect | −0.246 (0.052) | −0.340 (0.061) | −0.195 (0.146) | −0.291 (0.140) |
| Minimisation/denial | 0.105 (0.415) | 0.035 (0.854) | 0.129 (0.340) | 0.151 (0.452) |
| Emotional abuse | −0.352 (0.052) | −0.150 (0.266) | −0.286 (0.149) | |
| Total score | −0.061 (0.637) | −0.274 (0.136) | 0.067 (0.622) | −0.112 (0.579) |
| Mystical experience | −0.102 (0.428) | 0.097 (0.475) | 0.016 (0.938) | |
| Positive mood | −0.043 (0.737) | −0.351 (0.053) | 0.104 (0.441) | −0.194 (0.332) |
| Transcendence | −0.164 (0.200) | −0.213 (0.250) | −0.116 (0.388) | −0.094 (0.642) |
| Ineffability | −0.143 (0.265) | −0.338 (0.063) | 0.064 (0.636) | −0.101 (0.616) |
Depressed population is those with BDI-II score ≥14 at baselines (four lost to follow-up). Results significant at alpha = 0.05 level are highlighted in bold. Negative correlation equates to greater changes in BDI-II related to higher scores on CTQ and MEQ.
Figure 3Mean changes in DNA methylation across 5 CPG positions within the SIGMAR1 gene (paired t-test p = 0.01; n = 38).
Figure 4Correlation analysis of CTQ total score at baseline against SIGMAR1 Mean DNA Methylation Difference (from T2 to T1).