| Literature DB >> 34177648 |
Krystyna Kowalczuk1, Elżbieta Krajewska-Kułak1, Marek Sobolewski2.
Abstract
Introduction: The health of nurses has a direct impact on the quality of care and health outcomes for patients. The length and quality of sleep as well as the intensity of perceived stress have an impact on the health of nurses. An appropriate stress coping strategy can reduce the impact of stress and mitigate its negative consequences. Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between excessive sleepiness and insomnia in interaction with selected socio-occupational factors and stress coping strategies among nurses. Material and Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted among 448 nurses working in hospitals in Podlasie Province in Poland. Mini-Cope inventory - the polish adaptation of Carver's BriefCope was used for measuring coping with stress. Sleep problems were assessed using the Athens Insomnia Scale and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.Entities:
Keywords: coping strategies; excessive sleepiness; insomnia; nurse; sleep; stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 34177648 PMCID: PMC8223071 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.660776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Descriptive statistics for measures of coping strategies and sleep problems among nurses (N = 448).
| 1 | Active coping | 1.88 (1.81–1.95) | 2.0 | 0.77 |
| 2 | Planning | 1.85 (1.79–1.92) | 2.0 | 0.71 |
| 3 | Use of emotional support | 1.79 (1.72–1.87) | 2.0 | 0.78 |
| 4 | Use of instrumental support | 1.79 (1.72–1.86) | 2.0 | 0.74 |
| 5 | Acceptance | 1.74 (1.68–1.80) | 2.0 | 0.67 |
| 6 | Positive reframing | 1.68 (1.61–1.74) | 1.5 | 0.67 |
| 7 | Self-distraction | 1.59 (1.53–1.66) | 1.5 | 0.70 |
| 8 | Venting | 1.41 (1.35–1.48) | 1.5 | 0.72 |
| 9 | Religion | 1.34 (1.25–1.42) | 1.5 | 0.89 |
| 10 | Self-blame | 1.28 (1.21–1.36) | 1.0 | 0.80 |
| 11 | Humour | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) | 1.0 | 0.77 |
| 12 | Denial | 0.98 (0.91–1.06) | 1.0 | 0.81 |
| 13 | Behavioural disengagement | 0.98 (0.91–1.05) | 1.0 | 0.74 |
| 14 | Substance use | 0.74 (0.66–0.82) | 0.5 | 0.86 |
| AIS | 8.7 (8.2–9.2) | 8.0 | 5.3 | |
| ESS | 9.3 (8.8–9.8) | 9.0 | 5.3 | |
Correlations between coping responses and measures of sleep problems (N = 448).
| Active coping | −0.06 (0.2163) | 0.07 (0.1470) |
| Planning | −0.03 (0.5127) | 0.13 (0.0058 |
| Positive reframing | −0.02 (0.7384) | 0.14 (0.0038 |
| Religion | 0.09 (0.0520) | 0.21 (0.0000 |
| Use of emotional support | −0.08 (0.1064) | 0.17 (0.0004 |
| Use of instrumental support | −0.05 (0.2769) | 0.17 (0.0005 |
| Venting | 0.18 (0.0001 | 0.34 (0.0000 |
| Self-blame | 0.27 (0.0000 | 0.35 (0.0000 |
| Acceptance | 0.03 (0.5352) | 0.15 (0.0018 |
| Humour | 0.14 (0.0031 | 0.23 (0.0000 |
| Self-distraction | 0.14 (0.0037 | 0.25 (0.0000 |
| Denial | 0.22 (0.0000 | 0.32 (0.0000 |
| Substance use | 0.25 (0.0000 | 0.32 (0.0000 |
| Behavioural disengagement | 0.29 (0.0000 | 0.34 (0.0000 |
Statistically significant correlations was highlighted (
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001).
Regression models for active strategies (N = 448).
| Active coping | AIS (score) | −0.022 (−0.039; −0.006) | −0.15 | 0.0073 | |
| ESS (score) | 4.6% | 0.020 (0.004; 0.037) | 0.14 | 0.0137 | |
| Use of sick leave | 0.160 (0.013; 0.307) | 0.11 | 0.0332 | ||
| Interventional unit × ESS (score) | 0.035 (0.006; 0.064) | 0.12 | 0.0173 | ||
| Planning | ESS (score) | 2.1% | 0.018 (0.004; 0.032) | 0.13 | 0.0104 |
| Positive reframing | AIS (score) | 5.1% | −0.019 (−0.034; −0.004) | −0.14 | 0.0145 |
| ESS (score) | 0.032 (0.017; 0.048) | 0.24 | 0.0001 | ||
| Tertiary education × ESS (score) | −0.029 (−0.056; −0.001) | −0.11 | 0.0436 | ||
| Interventional unit × ESS (score) | −0.026 (−0.052; 0.000) | −0.10 | 0.0474 |
R2, coefficient of determination; B, regression coefficient with 95% c.i., p-value for significance of each regression coefficient; β, standardize regression coefficient.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
Regression models for support-seeking and emotion-oriented strategies (N = 448).
| Religion | ESS (score) | 0.031 (0.014; 0.048) | 0.18 | 0.0003 | |
| Tertiary education × AIS (score) | 6.9% | −0.044 (−0.079; −0.009) | −0.12 | 0.0134 | |
| Interventional unit × ESS (score) | −0.041 (−0.075; −0.006) | −0.11 | 0.0199 | ||
| Use of emotional support | AIS (score) | 4.5% | −0.027 (−0.043; −0.010) | −0.18 | 0.0015 |
| ESS (score) | 0.035 (0.019; 0.052) | 0.23 | 0.0000 | ||
| Use of instrumental support | Tertiary education | 6.4% | 0.236 (0.065; 0.408) | 0.14 | 0.0070 |
| AIS (score) | −0.016 (−0.033; 0.000) | −0.11 | 0.0470 | ||
| ESS (score) | 0.036 (0.020; 0.052) | 0.25 | 0.0000 | ||
| Venting | ESS (score) | 10.6% | 0.046 (0.033; 0.058) | 0.33 | 0.0000 |
| Self-blame | AIS (score) | 15.9% | 0.021 (0.004; 0.037) | 0.13 | 0.0124 |
| ESS (score) | 0.047 (0.031; 0.063) | 0.30 | 0.0000 |
R2, coefficient of determination; B, regression coefficient with 95% c.i., p-value for significance of each regression coefficient; β, standardize regression coefficient.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
Regression models for avoidant strategies (N = 448).
| Acceptance | ESS (score) | 2.1% | 0.019 (0.006; 0.032) | 0.14 | 0.0038 |
| Humour | ESS (score) | 0.042 (0.028; 0.056) | 0.28 | 0.0000 | |
| Tertiary education × AIS (score) | −0.045 (−0.078; −0.012) | −0.15 | 0.0075 | ||
| Tertiary education × ESS (score) | 13.8% | −0.051 (−0.084; −0.018) | −0.17 | 0.0025 | |
| Interventional unit × AIS (score) | 0.044 (0.013; 0.076) | 0.15 | 0.0059 | ||
| Interventional unit × ESS (score) | −0.032 (−0.063; 0.000) | −0.11 | 0.0469 | ||
| Self-distraction | ESS (score) | 6.6% | 0.036 (0.023; 0.049) | 0.26 | 0.0000 |
| Denial | Tertiary education | 12.0% | −0.178 (−0.352; −0.004) | −0.10 | 0.0446 |
| ESS (score) | 0.051 (0.036; 0.065) | 0.32 | 0.0000 | ||
| Substance use | AIS (score) | 17.5% | 0.032 (0.015; 0.048) | 0.19 | 0.0002 |
| ESS (score) | 0.041 (0.024; 0.058) | 0.25 | 0.0000 | ||
| Tertiary education × AIS (score) | −0.058 (−0.089; −0.028) | −0.17 | 0.0002 | ||
| Behavioural disengagement | AIS (score) | 0.019 (0.004; 0.033) | 0.13 | 0.0141 | |
| ESS (score) | 18.6% | 0.044 (0.029; 0.060) | 0.32 | 0.0000 | |
| Tertiary education | −0.162 (−0.314; −0.009) | −0.10 | 0.0377 | ||
| Tertiary education × ESS (score) | −0.035 (−0.062; −0.008) | −0.12 | 0.0103 |
R2, coefficient of determination; B, regression coefficient with 95% c.i., p-value for significance of each regression coefficient; β, standardize regression coefficient.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.