| Literature DB >> 34176509 |
Huidi Zhang1, Qingqing Man1, Pengkun Song1, Siran Li1, Xiaobing Liu1, Lijuan Wang1, Yuqian Li1, Yichun Hu1, Lichen Yang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is significantly associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease and its prevalence is showing a trend of getting younger. Previous studies on the relationship between elements and MetS were mostly reported in adults with single element analysis, while reports in children with combined effects of multiple elements were very limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between whole blood Cu, Mg and Zn in both single and combined effects and MetS components in rural Chinese children aged 6-12 years based on the data from 2010-2012 China National Nutrition and Health Survey.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese children; Copper; Magnesium; MetS components; Whole blood; Zinc
Year: 2021 PMID: 34176509 PMCID: PMC8237488 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-021-00593-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Basic characteristics of children according to sex and the number of MetS components
| Indexes | Total (N = 911) | Male (N = 467) | Female (N = 444) | MetS components | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0(N = 497) | 1(N = 336) | ≥ 2(N = 78) | ||||
| Age(years) | 9.12 ± 1.70 | 9.01 ± 1.70 | 9.23 ± 1.70 | 8.93 ± 1.69 | 9.31 ± 1.68 | 9.51 ± 1.68# |
| Height (m) | 131.52 ± 11.84 | 131.06 ± 11.41 | 132.01 ± 12.27 | 130.08 ± 10.71 | 132.71 ± 12.58 | 135.59 ± 13.87# |
| Weight (kg) | 28.95 ± 8.74 | 29.17 ± 8.96 | 28.71 ± 8.49 | 26.95 ± 6.81 | 30.33 ± 9.27 | 35.74 ± 12.21# |
| Waist (cm) | 55.96 ± 7.91 | 56.76 ± 7.93 | 55.11 ± 7.82* | 53.40 ± 5.01 | 57.58 ± 8.69 | 65.25 ± 10.41# |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.41 ± 2.78 | 16.66 ± 2.98 | 16.15 ± 2.53 | 15.72 ± 2.27 | 16.86 ± 2.82 | 18.92 ± 3.65# |
| Obesity (%) | 16.02% | 14.56% | 17.56% | 0% | 27.08% | 70.51%# |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.79 ± 0.48 | 0.74 ± 0.46 | 0.85 ± 0.50* | 0.67 ± 0.29 | 0.93 ± 0.62 | 1.00 ± 0.56# |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.27 ± 0.30 | 1.31 ± 0.30 | 1.23 ± 0.29* | 1.40 ± 0.26 | 1.15 ± 0.28 | 1.01 ± 0.21# |
| FG (mmol/L) | 4.85 ± 0.71 | 4.9 ± 0.73 | 4.8 ± 0.68 | 4.71 ± 0.53 | 4.94 ± 0.77 | 5.36 ± 1.08# |
| SBP(mmHg) | 92.44 ± 11.42 | 92.68 ± 10.88 | 92.19 ± 11.96 | 91.44 ± 10.16 | 92.92 ± 12.31 | 96.77 ± 13.73# |
| DBP (mmHg) | 60.23 ± 8.65 | 60.23 ± 8.07 | 60.23 ± 9.24 | 59.41 ± 7.72 | 60.77 ± 9.47 | 63.18 ± 9.77# |
| Cu (mg/L) | 1.01 ± 0.13 | 1.03 ± 0.14 | 0.99 ± 0.13* | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 1.01 ± 0.13 | 1.07 ± 0.14# |
| Zn (mg/L) | 5.21 ± 1.07 | 5.19 ± 1.06 | 5.24 ± 1.08 | 5.21 ± 1.05 | 5.22 ± 1.09 | 5.19 ± 1.11 |
| Cu/Zn | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.04* | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.21 ± 0.04# |
| Mg (mg/L) | 41.44 ± 5.28 | 41.29 ± 5.24 | 41.6 ± 5.32 | 41.16 ± 5.26 | 41.74 ± 5.34 | 41.92 ± 5.04 |
BMI, body mass index; TG, triglycerides;HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; FG, fasting glucose;SBP, systolic blood pressure;DBP, diastolic blood pressure; *p < 0.05 for sex; #p < 0.05 for trend
Distribution of metabolic syndrome component indicators by tertiles (T1–T3) of blood copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), the Cu/Zn ratio and ³ã³ (Mg) levels
| Indexes | Cu (mg/L) | Zn (mg/L) | Cu/Zn | Mg (mg/L) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||||
| N = 911 | 294 | 315 | 302 | 300 | 310 | 301 | 295 | 311 | 305 | 300 | 310 | 301 | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.16 | 16.23 | 16.85 | 16.21 | 16.45 | 16.58 | 0.250 | 16.45 | 16.48 | 16.31 | 0.733 | 16.25 | 16.56 | 16.42 | 0.388 | |
| Waist (cm) | 55.91 | 55.21 | 56.78* | 55.52 | 55.98 | 56.36 | 0.430 | 55.96 | 56.36 | 55.54* | 0.444 | 55.13 | 56.10 | 56.64 | 0.060 | |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.74# | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.82* | 0.063 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.72# | 0.73 | 0.85 | 0.79 | |||
HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.26 | 0.085 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.325 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 0.695 | 1.26 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 0.735 |
| FG (mmol/L) | 4.79 | 4.89 | 4.88 | 0.201 | 4.82 | 4.81 | 4.93* | 0.062 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 4.82 | 0.601 | 4.81 | 4.80 | 4.95 | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 92.27 | 91.94 | 93.13 | 0.412 | 90.54 | 92.94 | 93.83* | 93.86 | 92.84 | 90.67# | 91.22 | 92.84 | 93.25 | 0.070 | ||
| DBP (mmHg) | 59.28 | 60.21 | 61.19* | 58.58 | 60.95 | 61.15* | 61.17 | 60.35 | 59.21# | 58.98 | 60.56 | 61.15* | ||||
The bold numbers, P value was < 0.05, and the difference was statistically significant
BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FG, fasting glucose; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; *positive correlation; #negative correlation
Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for metabolic syndrome components according to whole blood metals distribution
| Index | Cu | Zn | Cu/Zn | Mg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||||
| N = 911 | 294 | 315 | 302 | 300 | 310 | 301 | 295 | 311 | 305 | 300 | 310 | 301 | ||||
| Elevated Waist | ||||||||||||||||
| n | 32 | 44 | 70 | 51 | 50 | 45 | 37 | 50 | 59 | 40 | 49 | 57 | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 1.32 (0.82–2.16) | 1 | 0.93 (0.61–1.43) | 0.85 (0.55–1.32) | 0.789 | 1 | 1.33 (0.84–2.11) | 1 | 1.22 (0.77–1.91) | 1.51 (0.97–2.35) | 0.172 | ||||
| Adjusted | 1 | 1.23 (0.71–2.12) | 1 | 0.78 (0.48–1.28) | 0.62 (0.37–1.04) | 0.194 | 1 | 1.32 (0.77–2.28) | 1 | 1.21 (0.71–2.04) | 1.58 (0.95–2.62) | 0.200 | ||||
| Hypertension | ||||||||||||||||
| n | 9 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 11 | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.72 (0.26–1.95) | 1.42 (0.59–3.38) | 0.334 | 1 | 1.10 (0.39–3.09) | 2.04 (0.81–5.13) | 0.205 | 1 | 0.66 (0.29–1.52) | 0.33 (0.12–0.94) | 0.096 | 1 | 0.96 (0.37–2.47) | 1.22 (0.50–3.00) | 0.849 |
| Adjusted | 1 | 0.94 (0.33–2.64) | 1.95 (0.79–4.82) | 0.175 | 1 | 0.91 (0.32–2.60) | 1.48 (0.70–2.85) | 0.513 | 1 | 0.83 (0.35–1.93) | 0.58 (0.20–1.69) | 0.610 | 1 | 0.85 (0.32–2.24) | 1.04 (0.42–2.61) | 0.909 |
| Elevated TG | ||||||||||||||||
| n | 34 | 20 | 13 | 14 | 31 | 22 | 34 | 21 | 12 | 13 | 30 | 24 | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 1 | 1.61 (0.80–3.21) | 1 | 1 | 1.91 (0.95–3.83) | ||||||||||
| Adjusted | 1 | 1 | 1.41 (0.70–2.85) | 0.066 | 1 | 0.57 (0.32–1.02) | 1 | 1.81 (0.90–3.66) | ||||||||
| Reduced HDL-C | ||||||||||||||||
| n | 62 | 62 | 75 | 74 | 66 | 59 | 53 | 73 | 73 | 68 | 64 | 67 | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.91 (0.61–1.36) | 1.23 (0.84–1.81) | 0.281 | 1 | 0.82 (0.56–1.20) | 0.74 (0.51–1.09) | 0.310 | 1 | 1.40 (0.94–2.08) | 1.43 (0.96–2.13) | 0.145 | 1 | 0.88 (0.60–1.30) | 0.97 (0.66–1.43) | 0.815 |
| Adjusted | 1 | 0.90 (0.61–1.35) | 1.23 (0.83–1.82) | 0.282 | 1 | 0.81 (0.55–1.18) | 0.72 (0.49–1.07) | 0.266 | 1 | 1.40 (0.93–2.09) | 1.48 (0.98–2.23) | 0.132 | 1 | 0.88 (0.60–1.31) | 0.97 (0.66–1.42) | 0.828 |
| Hyperglycemia | ||||||||||||||||
| n | 25 | 37 | 32 | 37 | 26 | 31 | 25 | 33 | 36 | 31 | 25 | 38 | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 1.43 (0.83–2.44) | 1.27 (0.73–2.21) | 0.414 | 1 | 0.65 (0.38–1.10) | 0.81 (0.49–1.35) | 0.277 | 1 | 1.28 (0.74–2.13) | 1.44 (0.84–2.47) | 0.399 | 1 | 0.76 (0.43–1.32) | 1.25 (0.75–2.07) | 0.180 |
| Adjusted | 1 | 1.57 (0.91–2.70) | 1.36 (0.77–2.39) | 0.429 | 1 | 0.62 (0.36–1.06) | 0.75 (0.45–1.26) | 0.212 | 1 | 1.40 (0.80–2.44) | 1.69 (0.97–2.95) | 0.177 | 1 | 0.73 (0.41–1.27) | 1.22 (0.73–2.03) | 0.108 |
The bold numbers, P value was < 0.05, and the difference was statistically significant
Adjusted = adjusted for age, BMI, sex; Crude = non-adjusted; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; P, P for trend; TG, triglycerides; T, tertile
Fig. 1Associations of blood element levels with elevated waist. HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; Low means < 50% concentration; High means ≥ 50% concentration; Low Cu + Low Zn, Low Cu + Low Mg and Low Zn + Low Mg were taken as the reference group; Shown are the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals in parentheses
Fig. 2Associations of blood element levels with elevated triglycerides. HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; Low means < 50% concentration; High means ≥ 50% concentration;Low Cu + Low Zn, Low Cu + Low Mg and Low Zn + Low Mg were taken as the reference group; Shown are the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals in parentheses
Fig. 3Associations of blood element levels with reduced HDL-C. HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; Low means < 50% concentration; High means ≥ 50% concentration; Low Cu + Low Zn, Low Cu + Low Mg and Low Zn + Low Mg were taken as the reference group; Shown are the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals in parentheses
Summary of the significant results of the odds ratios for MetS components associated with single and combined elements
| Single | Cu | Zn | Mg | Cu/Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | T2 | T2 | T3 | |
| Elevated waist | ||||
| Elevated TG | ||||
| Reduced HDL-C |
The bold numbers, P value was < 0.05, and the difference was statistically significant
HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglycerides;Low means < 50% concentration; High means ≥ 50% concentration; Low Cu + Low Zn, Low Cu + Low Mg and Low Zn + Low Mg were taken as the reference; Shown are the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals.; -, the results didn’t have statisticlly significance