Vanessa L Jacoby1, Amy Murtha2, Yalda Afshar3, Stephanie L Gaw4, Ifeyinwa Asiodu5, Jorge Tolosa6, Mary E Norton4, W John Boscardin7, Valerie Flaherman8. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1793, 2356 Sutter St., San Francisco, CA 94115. Electronic address: Vanessa.Jacoby@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1793, 2356 Sutter St., San Francisco, CA 94115. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 5. Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. 7. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 8. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Many studies have evaluated birth outcomes in patients with COVID-19, but less attention has been paid to the risk of early pregnancy loss (EPL) despite the known association of miscarriage with viral infection. The current literature is limited by a small number of cases, a focus on inpatient visits, and lack of longitudinal follow-up.2, 3, 4, 5 These studies have primarily been conducted in Europe and Asia, which limits generalizability to a diverse US population with unique patient characteristics. To address this evidence gap, we present data on a cohort of US women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy to help inform clinical practice.
Study Design
The Pregnancy Coronavirus Outcomes Registry (PRIORITY) study is an ongoing, nationwide, prospective cohort study of pregnant people COVID-19 during pregnancy in the United States. Participants were ≥13 years, under investigation for or had confirmed COVID-19 (defined as a positive polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2), and were enrolled from March 2020 to October 2020. For this analysis, we selected participants who were enrolled at <14 weeks gestation and who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing; 7 were excluded owing to a lack of longitudinal follow-up. The study was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (IRB #20-30410).Participants completed questionnaires at enrollment, weekly thereafter for 4 weeks, and then multiple times throughout pregnancy. Medical record review was used to adjudicate adverse outcomes in a subsample of the population. We calculated the incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EPL, defined as pregnancy loss at <20 weeks’ gestation.
Results
Among the 1338 PRIORITY participants, 109 were enrolled at <14 weeks gestation and comprised the analysis set; 94 had a positive test result for COVID-19 and 15 had a negative test result for COVID-19. All of the 109 patients were outpatients, and all were symptomatic. The average age of the population was 31 years; 33% of the participants were Hispanic (Table
). The mean gestational age at enrollment was approximately 9 weeks; 83% of participants had at least 1 month of longitudinal follow-up before the end of pregnancy.
Table
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population according to COVID-19 status
Characteristics
COVID-19 positive, n=94
COVID-19 negative, n=15
Age (y), mean±SD
31.2±4.77
30.5±5.37
Race and ethnicity, n (%)
Asian
4 (4.0)
1 (5.9)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 (1.0)
0 (0.0)
Black or African American
2 (2.1)
2 (13.3)
Hispanic or Latina
33 (35.1)
3 (20.0)
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
1 (1.1)
0 (0.0)
White
62 (66.0)
10 (66.7)
Region, n (%)
Midwest
14 (14.9)
4 (26.7)
Northeast
31 (33.0)
1 (6.7)
South
17 (18.1)
4 (26.7)
West
29 (30.9)
6 (40.0)
Gravida, mean±SD
2.68±1.79
1.87±0.99
Parity, mean±SD
1.02±1.36
0.467±0.64
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean±SD
26.8±6.45
24±4.22
Gestational age at enrollment (wk), mean±SD
9.76±2.84
9.83±3.24
Health history, n (%)
Asthma
10 (10.6)
1 (6.7)
Hypertension
2 (2.1)
0 (0.0)
Thyroid disease
4 (4.3)
3 (20.0)
Depression
15 (16.0)
3 (20.0)
Anxiety
17 (18.1)
6 (40.0)
Current smoker
1 (1.1)
0 (0.0)
SD, standard deviation.
Jacoby. Risk of pregnancy loss at <20 weeks’ gestation with COVID-19. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population according to COVID-19 statusSD, standard deviation.Jacoby. Risk of pregnancy loss at <20 weeks’ gestation with COVID-19. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.In the COVID-19–positive group, 6 of 94 patients (6.4%; 95% CI, 2.4%–13.4%) had EPL compared with 1 of 15 in the COVID-19–negative group (6.7%; 95% CI, 0.1%–31.9%). In the COVID-19–positive group, 5 EPLs occurred at 7 to 12 weeks’ gestation and 1 occurred at 15 weeks’ gestation. In a subgroup analysis of 34 COVID-19–positive participants enrolled at <8 weeks’ gestation, 2 of 34 patients had EPL (5.9%). In the COVID-19–positive group, 82 of 90 patients (91.1%; 95% CI, 83.2%–96.1%) had live births, of which 82.9% (95% CI, 73%–90.3%) were at term and 17.1% (95% CI 9.7%–27%) were at <37 weeks’ gestation; 4 of 94 pregnancies are ongoing but all are at >24 weeks’ gestation.
Conclusion
In this nationwide study of pregnant people in the United States, the risk for pregnancy loss at <20 weeks’ gestation was about 6% for both the participants with COVID-19 (n=94) and the controls without COVID-19 (n=15). These data compare favorably with the 10% rate of miscarriage among clinically recognized first-trimester pregnancies before the pandemic. This study conducted analyses of COVID-19 in 109 pregnant people in the first trimester in a longitudinal US cohort. With this sample size, the upper bound of the CI for pregnancy loss of 13.4% is reassuring because it is not significantly higher than the expected miscarriage rate without viral infection. These results can guide counseling for people infected with SARS-CoV-2 early in pregnancy.
Authors: R K Gajbhiye; A Tilve; S Kesarwani; S Srivastava; S J Kore; K Patil; S D Mahale; N N Mahajan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 7.299