| Literature DB >> 34174967 |
Natália Regina Cesaretto1, Jader de Oliveira2,3, Amanda Ravazi1, Fernanda Fernandez Madeira4, Yago Visinho Dos Reis1, Ana Beatriz Bortolozo de Oliveira4, Roberto Dezan Vicente1, Daniel Cesaretto Cristal3, Cleber Galvão5, Maria Tercília Vilela de Azeredo-Oliveira4, João Aristeu da Rosa3, Kaio Cesar Chaboli Alevi1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meccus' taxonomy has been quite complex since the first species of this genus was described by Burmeister in 1835 as Conorhinus phyllosoma. In 1859 the species was transferred to the genus Meccus and in 1930 to Triatoma. However, in the twentieth century, the Meccus genus was revalidated (alteration corroborated by molecular studies) and, in the twenty-first century, through a comprehensive study including more sophisticated phylogenetic reconstruction methods, Meccus was again synonymous with Triatoma. Events of natural hybridization with production of fertile offspring have already been reported among sympatric species of the T. phyllosoma subcomplex, and experimental crosses demonstrated reproductive viability among practically all species of the T. phyllosoma subcomplex that were considered as belonging to the genus Meccus, as well as between these species and species of Triatoma. Based on the above, we carried out experimental crosses between T. longipennis (considered M. longipennis in some literature) and T. mopan (always considered as belonging to Triatoma) to evaluate the reproductive compatibility between species of the T. phyllosoma complex. In addition, we have grouped our results with information from the literature regarding crosses between species that were grouped in the genus Meccus with Triatoma, in order to discuss the importance of experimental crosses to confirm the generic reorganization of species.Entities:
Keywords: Chagas disease vector; Experimental crosses; T. longipennis; T. mopan; Triatomines
Year: 2021 PMID: 34174967 PMCID: PMC8235253 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04847-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Experimental crosses performed between Triatoma spp. and Meccus spp.
| Crossing experiments | Number of eggs | Egg fertility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 161 | 98 (61%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 18a | 12a (67%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 14a | 09a (64%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 25a | 19a (76%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 32a | 23a (72%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 14a | 9a (64%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 208a | 156a (75%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 392a | 295 (75%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 71.0 ± 78.3b | 6.0 ± 0b (8,4%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 74.8 ± 44.6b | 6.0 ± 0b (8%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 94.8 ± 39.6b | 5.7 ± 6.4b (6%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 136.0 ± 68.9b | 12.3 ± 15.4b (8.8%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 91.2 ± 77.3b | 5.0 ± 0b (5.5%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 54.0 ± 59.9b | 14.5 ± 13.4b (26.8%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 92.7 ± 56.5b | 3.0 ± 1.3b (3.2%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 119.8 ± 38.3b | 5.3 ± 0.6b (4.4%) | ||
| ♀ | x | ♂ | 127.8 ± 88.1b | 26.0 ± 26.7b (20%) | ||
a Martinez-Ibarra et al. [19]; b Martinez-Ibarra et al.[20]