| Literature DB >> 34174811 |
Vanya Bhushan1, Syed Azmal Ali1, Vipul Batra2, Parul Sarwalia2, Ankit Pal2, Seema Karanwal2, Subhash Solanki2, Arumugam Kumaresan3, Rakesh Kumar2, Tirtha Kumar Datta4.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: Low conception rate (CR) despite insemination with morphologically normal spermatozoa is a common reproductive restraint that limits buffalo productivity. This accounts for a significant loss to the farmers and the dairy industry, especially in agriculture-based economies. The immune-related proteins on the sperm surface are known to regulate fertility by assisting the spermatozoa in their survival and performance in the female reproductive tract (FRT). Regardless of their importance, very few studies have specifically catalogued the buffalo sperm surface proteome. The study was designed to determine the identity of sperm surface proteins and to ascertain if the epididymal expressed beta-defensins (BDs), implicated in male fertility, are translated and applied onto buffalo sperm surface along with other immune-related proteins.Entities:
Keywords: Beta-defensins; Buffalo; Epididymis; Glycosylation; Sperm
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34174811 PMCID: PMC8235841 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07640-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
The seven treatment sub-groups for sperm-surface protein extraction from two treatment classes and the corresponding TPP results indicating total spectra, correctly and incorrectly identified proteins at p ≥ 0.6 and 0.99
| Sample | PEP-XML Total spectra | Ipro.pep.xml Total spectra | Prot.xml Total proteins | Total proteins with | Incorrectly identified with iProphet | Total proteins with | Incorrectly identified with iProphet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2x-DPBS-30 min | 26,535 | 7252 | 1733 | 875 | 76 | 317 | 0 |
| 4x-DPBS-30 min | 26,470 | 8399 | 1725 | 956 | 76 | 391 | 0 |
| 2x-DPBS-60 min | 25,947 | 7742 | 1898 | 1013 | 90 | 395 | 0 |
| 4x-DPBS-60 min | 25,951 | 8210 | 2162 | 1244 | 99 | 432 | 0 |
| 1 U/ml | 24,829 | 6557 | 1788 | 992 | 99 | 385 | 0 |
| 1.5 U/ml | 24,587 | 6343 | 1932 | 1005 | 76 | 353 | 0 |
| 2 U/ml | 24,881 | 5978 | 1662 | 793 | 63 | 364 | 0 |
Fig. 1The semantic-similarity based scatter plots depicting the summarized lists of GO terms for a Biological Process, b Molecular Function and c Cellular Component domains for the buffalo sperm surface proteins
The major GO annotation terms, Fisher’s p-values and Yekutieli result (FDR under dependency) for the singular enrichment analysis (SEA) of Biological Process, Molecular Function and Cellular Component annotation terms performed on the sperm-surface proteins in the input list
| Biological Process | Molecular Function | Cellular Component | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Term | FDR | Term | FDR | Term | FDR | |||
| Multicellular organismal process | 2.00E-27 | 1.40E-24 | Enzyme binding | 2.90E-24 | 2.90E-22 | Membrane-bounded vesicle | 5.70E-85 | 6.10E-83 |
| Sexual reproduction | 1.90E-25 | 6.60E-23 | Ubiquitin protein ligase binding | 8.20E-16 | 4.10E-14 | Vesicle | 5.70E-85 | 6.10E-83 |
| Reproduction | 1.30E-24 | 3.00E-22 | Protein binding | 6.00E-11 | 2.00E-09 | Extracellular region part | 3.80E-70 | 2.70E-68 |
| Reproductive process | 1.20E-22 | 2.10E-20 | Unfolded protein binding | 3.60E-09 | 9.00E-08 | Extracellular region | 3.60E-62 | 1.90E-60 |
| Positive regulation of biological process | 1.90E-21 | 2.70E-19 | Protein domain specific binding | 1.80E-08 | 3.50E-07 | Cytoplasm | 3.90E-32 | 1.60E-30 |
| Anatomical structure development | 4.70E-21 | 5.50E-19 | Carbohydrate binding | 8.40E-06 | 0.00014 | Membrane-bounded organelle | 1.60E-29 | 5.70E-28 |
| Regulation of biological quality | 4.20E-18 | 4.20E-16 | Binding | 0.00037 | 0.0037 | Extracellular space | 9.30E-25 | 2.20E-23 |
| Positive regulation of cellular process | 5.30E-18 | 4.70E-16 | Nucleotide binding | 0.00041 | 0.0037 | Organelle | 1.60E-23 | 3.50E-22 |
| System development | 1.10E-17 | 8.90E-16 | Enzyme regulator activity | 0.00041 | 0.0037 | Intracellular part | 8.60E-20 | 1.70E-18 |
| Response to stimulus | 5.10E-17 | 3.60E-15 | Catalytic activity | 0.0022 | 0.012 | Plasma membrane | 7.80E-18 | 1.30E-16 |
| Cellular developmental process | 1.10E-16 | 7.00E-15 | Receptor binding | 0.0024 | 0.012 | Cytoplasmic membrane-bounded vesicle | 4.80E-15 | 6.10E-14 |
| Response to biotic stimulus | 1.90E-13 | 5.60E-12 | Plasma membrane part | 5.00E-09 | 3.90E-08 | |||
| Cell part | 4.80E-06 | 2.60E-05 | ||||||
| Cell | 4.80E-06 | 2.60E-05 | ||||||
Fig. 2Histogram plots of the observed mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) values produced upon binding of six different FITC-labelled lectins viz. a ABL, b JAC, c LEL, d LCA, e MAL-II, and f PNA on buffalo bull spermatozoa in NCM (control), 2x-DPBS (2x-30) or spermatozoa exposed to 2 U/mL PI-PLC. The differences being assessed by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test
Fig. 3Relative expression profiles of the two CA-BD genes, BuBD-126 a and BuBD-129 b in the peripheral blood and ejaculated spermatozoa obtained from Murrah buffalo bulls. Expression values were normalized to GAPDH & eEF-2. Horizontal bars represent the mean(s) and error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM)
Fig. 4Immuno-localization pattern of the two CA-BDs viz. BuBD-126 and 129 using the in house generated anti-BuBD-129 and 126 antibodies, respectively in rabbit against selected B-epitopes. The decrease of the fluorescent signal intensity pertaining to the removal of the CA-BDs, BuBD-126 and 129 from the buffalo bull sperm surface is observable after both, the 2x-DPBS and PI-PLC treatments
Fig. 5Bright-field images of a Grade A and B oocytes aspirated from buffalo ovaries, b Matured cumulus-oocyte complexes after IVM, c 2-celled stage, d 4-celled stage, e 8-celled stage, f 16-celled stage, g Morula and h Blastocyst stage of buffalo embryo observed during IVF studies
Fig. 6Scatter plots showing the Mean ± SD for cleavage rate a, morula b and blastocyst formation rates c in the control group and samples treated with three different concentrations of anti-BuBD-129
Fig. 7The overall research methodology followed for BuBD identification on the buffalo sperm surface by LC-MS/MS.
The six lectins used to assess changes in the sperm-surface after salt/PI-PLC treatments
| Lectin | Major sugar recognized |
|---|---|
| LEL (Lycopericon esculentum lectin) | [GlcNAc]1–3, N-acetylglucosamine |
| ABL (Agaricus bisporus lectin) | Galactosyl (β-1,3) N-acetylgalactosamine |
| JAC (Jacalin) | Mono or di-sialylated ofT-antigen |
| MAL II ( | α-2,3 linked Sialic acid |
| LCA ( | Mannose and Glucose moieties |
| PNA (Peanut agglutinin) | Asialylatedgalactosyl (β-1,3)N-acetylgalactosamine |