Hirofumi Kusuki1, Yuri Mizutani2, Yuka Tsuchiya3, Miki Nishio3, Shota Oikawa2, Rina Nagata2, Yumi Kiriyanagi2, Kayo Horio4, Misa Hosoi2, Hideaki Matsuura5, Tsuneaki Sadanaga6, Tadayoshi Hata5. 1. Graduate school of Health Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan. Electronic address: hiro.kusuki@gmail.com. 2. Clinical Laboratory Division, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan. 3. Graduate school of Health Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan. 4. Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan. 5. Graduate school of Health Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan; Clinical Laboratory Division, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan. 6. Seigato Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The JT interval of the myocardial repolarization time can be divided into Jpoint to T-peak interval (JTp) and T-peak to T-end interval (Tpe). It is well known that the JT interval is dependent on the heart rate, but little is known regarding heart rate dependence for JTp and Tpe. The aim of the present study was to clarify the heart rate dependence of JTp and Tpe and to elucidate the interference of autonomic nervous activity with these parameters. METHODS: We evaluated 50 prepubertal children (mean age: 6.4 ± 0.5 years; male:female, 22:28) without heart disease. JTp, Tpe, and the preceding RR intervals were measured using 120 consecutive beats (lead CM5). First, the relationships between the RR interval and JTp and Tpe were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Second, to evaluate autonomic interference with JTp and Tpe, the degree of coherence between RR interval variability and JTp or Tpe variability was calculated using spectral analysis. RESULTS: Significant positive correlations were observed between the RR interval and JTp (y = 0.116x + 105.5; r = 0.594, p < 0.001) and between the RR interval and Tpe (y = 0.037x + 44.7; r = 0.432, p < 0.001). Tpe variability had a lower degree of coherence with RR interval variability (range: 0.039-0.5 Hz) than with JTp variability (0.401 [interquartile range, 0.352-0.460] vs. 0.593 [0.503-0.664], respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tpe had lower heart rate dependence and a lower degree of autonomic nervous interference than did JTp.
OBJECTIVE: The JT interval of the myocardial repolarization time can be divided into Jpoint to T-peak interval (JTp) and T-peak to T-end interval (Tpe). It is well known that the JT interval is dependent on the heart rate, but little is known regarding heart rate dependence for JTp and Tpe. The aim of the present study was to clarify the heart rate dependence of JTp and Tpe and to elucidate the interference of autonomic nervous activity with these parameters. METHODS: We evaluated 50 prepubertal children (mean age: 6.4 ± 0.5 years; male:female, 22:28) without heart disease. JTp, Tpe, and the preceding RR intervals were measured using 120 consecutive beats (lead CM5). First, the relationships between the RR interval and JTp and Tpe were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Second, to evaluate autonomic interference with JTp and Tpe, the degree of coherence between RR interval variability and JTp or Tpe variability was calculated using spectral analysis. RESULTS: Significant positive correlations were observed between the RR interval and JTp (y = 0.116x + 105.5; r = 0.594, p < 0.001) and between the RR interval and Tpe (y = 0.037x + 44.7; r = 0.432, p < 0.001). Tpe variability had a lower degree of coherence with RR interval variability (range: 0.039-0.5 Hz) than with JTp variability (0.401 [interquartile range, 0.352-0.460] vs. 0.593 [0.503-0.664], respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Tpe had lower heart rate dependence and a lower degree of autonomic nervous interference than did JTp.