Literature DB >> 34174474

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive function in adults with bipolar disorder: A pilot study.

Roger S McIntyre1, Yena Lee2, Nelson B Rodrigues2, Flora Nasri3, Guohui Lao4, Wan Zeng5, Biru Ye6, Ripeng Li3, Joshua D Rosenblat2, Rodrigo B Mansur2, Mehala Subramaniapillai2, Leanna M W Lui3, Kayla M Teopiz3, Tao Liu5, Jiaqi Xiong3, Ruoxi Zhang5, Weicong Lu5, Guiyun Xu5, Xiong Huang4, Kangguang Lin7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits are prevalent in bipolar disorder and are a significant contributor to negative patient-reported outcomes. Herein we conducted a pilot study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to improve cognitive function in adults with bipolar disorder.
METHODS: The study was a triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-control trial. Participants (aged 18 to 60) with a diagnosis of DSM-5-defined bipolar disorder (I or II) were recruited and randomized (N=36) to receive either a sham treatment (n=20) or an active rTMS treatment (n=16). Patients completed the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at baseline and 1-2 weeks after the rTMS intervention.
RESULTS: A significant group by time interaction was observed in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), (F (1, 34) = 17.0, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.33). Post-hoc analysis revealed that although both groups did not significantly differ at baseline (p = 0.58), patients in the active rTMS group significantly improved following neurostimulation (p = 0.02) for HVLT-R. Moreover, within-subject analysis indicated that the active rTMS group significantly improved in score from pre-treatment to post-treatment (p < 0.001), while the sham group did not improve (p = 0.94) for HVLT-R. No significant differences were seen in the other cognitive measures. LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted in a small sample .
CONCLUSION: This pilot study, which was intended to establish feasibility, suggests that rTMS may offer benefit in select domains of cognitive functioning in bipolar disorder. None of the measures across subdomains revealed a dyscognitive effect.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar depression; Bipolar disorder; Cognition; Cognitive measures; Neurostimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34174474     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  2 in total

Review 1.  Neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder: What we know and what we don't.

Authors:  Kamyar Keramatian; Ivan J Torres; Lakshmi N Yatham
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Effect of Pharmacological and Neurostimulation Interventions for Cognitive Domains in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Wen-Yin Chen; Hsing-Cheng Liu; Ying-Chih Cheng; Hua Li; Chi-Chieh Huang; Yu-Wei Ding; Ming-Chyi Huang; Chih-Chiang Chiu; Yu-Kang Tu; Po-Hsiu Kuo
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.790

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.