Literature DB >> 34173558

Use of biologics in the era of COVID-19: Where do we stand?

Young Bin Lee1, Seung Phil Hong1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 34173558      PMCID: PMC7416705          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2020.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAAD Int        ISSN: 2666-3287


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading for more than 5 months since the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. As of August 26, the pandemic had resulted in 23 million confirmed cases and 810,000 deaths worldwide. As the likelihood of prolonged spread without sudden termination of this situation increases, the topic of infection risk in patients treated with biologics is becoming crucial in the dermatologic field. Therefore, we conducted a PubMed search for articles reporting biologics exposure and reviewed guidelines on biologics use published during this pandemic. Although according to phase 2 and 3 clinical trials the most frequently experienced adverse effects of biologics include upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, or both, no significant increase in the risk of infection has been observed in treated groups compared with control groups., However, in most clinical studies, data on the incidence of lower respiratory tract infection (main pathogenicity of COVID-19) for each drug are insufficient, probably because of lack of investigator interest and low incidence (less than 5%). The risk of COVID-19 infection in dermatologic patients treated with biologics can be assessed, focusing on areas in which COVID-19 has spread rapidly (Table I). Although the control for biologics-treated groups is the general population rather than patients treated without biologics, the proportion of polymerase chain reaction–confirmed cases in the biologics-treated group is low (approximately 0%-1.8%). Given that the proportion of suspected (not confirmed but symptomatic) cases in the biologics-treated group varies by study, with up to 18% suspected cases being reported, it is important to distinguish and manage high-risk patients. To properly interpret these data, it is necessary to face the limitations of remarkably low proportions of infected patients in the biologics-treated group, limited adjustment of clinical parameters, and heterogeneity of design between studies.
Table I

Cohort studies for incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 infection in patients treated with biologics for dermatologic disease (listed in sample number)

AuthorCountryBiologics-treated group
Control group (general population)
PatientsCountAge, yearsSex ratio (M:F)Type of biologics (%)No. of COVID-19–infected patients (%)CountNo. of COVID-19–infected patients (%)
Gisondi P et al1ItalyPsoriasis520653.2 ± 11.21:0.84Anti–TNF-α antibody (32.2)Anti–IL-12/23 antibody (26.7)Anti–IL-23 antibody (2.7)Anti–IL-17 antibody (38.3)6 (0.12)
Damiani G et al2ItalyPsoriasis1193551:0.47Anti–TNF-α antibody (19.9)Anti–IL-12/23 antibody (45.4)Anti–IL-17 antibody (5.2)22 (1.84)10,060,57454,801 (0.54)
Gisondi P et al3ItalyPsoriasis98056.4 ± 12.41:0.72Anti–TNF-α antibody (50.0)Anti–IL-12/23 antibody (17.0)Anti–IL-23 antibody (0.0)Anti–IL-17 antibody (28.0)0257,3533199 (1.24)
Carugno A et al4ItalyPsoriasis15951.5 ± 14.01:0.39Anti–TNF-α antibody (33.3)Anti–IL-12/23 antibody or anti–IL-23 antibody (18.9)Anti–IL-17 antibody (47.8)29 (18.24)
Giulia R et al5ItalyHidradenitis suppurativa9635NDAnti–TNF-α antibody (47.9)Anti–IL-17 antibody (11.5)0
Carungo A et al6ItalyAtopic dermatitis3035.5 ± 11.91:0.5Anti–IL-4/13 antibody (100.0)0

COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; F, female patients; IL, interleukin; M, male patients; ND, not described; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Estimated for patients with suspected COVID-19 (not polymerase chain reaction confirmed). 1. Gisondi P et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with chronic plaque psoriasis being treated with biological therapy: the Northern Italy experience. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):373-374. 2. Damiani G et al. Biologics increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization, but not ICU admission and death: real-life data from a large cohort during red-zone declaration. Dermatol Ther. 2020;e13475. 3. Gisondi P et al. Risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 infection in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis receiving a biologic treatment and renal transplant recipients in maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):285-287. 4. Carugno A et al. COVID-19 and biologics for psoriasis: a high-epidemic area experience-Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):292-294. 5. Giulia R et al. Experience in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and COVID-19 symptoms. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.986. 6. Carungo A et al. No evidence of increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in a high-epidemic area - Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16552.

Cohort studies for incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 infection in patients treated with biologics for dermatologic disease (listed in sample number) COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; F, female patients; IL, interleukin; M, male patients; ND, not described; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Estimated for patients with suspected COVID-19 (not polymerase chain reaction confirmed). 1. Gisondi P et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with chronic plaque psoriasis being treated with biological therapy: the Northern Italy experience. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):373-374. 2. Damiani G et al. Biologics increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization, but not ICU admission and death: real-life data from a large cohort during red-zone declaration. Dermatol Ther. 2020;e13475. 3. Gisondi P et al. Risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 infection in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis receiving a biologic treatment and renal transplant recipients in maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):285-287. 4. Carugno A et al. COVID-19 and biologics for psoriasis: a high-epidemic area experience-Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):292-294. 5. Giulia R et al. Experience in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and COVID-19 symptoms. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.986. 6. Carungo A et al. No evidence of increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in a high-epidemic area - Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16552. Although conventional guidelines prohibit the use of biologics for acute severe infection, the need for recommendation with detailed risk stratification has been raised in preparation for various conditions that fit the current situation. Several expert opinions or consensus statements have been reported recently (Table II). It is generally recommended that asymptomatic low-risk patients continue treatment based on dosing schedule interruption, dysregulated immunogenicity (eg, antidrug antibody), and proven safety, whereas infected patients should discontinue treatment. Furthermore, dermatologists should make sound judgments depending on the circumstances (withholding, down-dosing, or postponement) for patients with exposure history or those at high risk. However, the definitions of high-risk factors vary, and information on restarting treatment for patients who have terminated treatment or initiating treatment for biologics-naive patients is limited.
Table II

Expert opinion∗ or official statement for recommendation of biologics use in dermatologic patients

Author/organizationSubjects for recommendationCurrent risk of patients for COVID-19 infectionRecommendation for current treatmentInitiation for biologic-naive patientsRemarks
International Psoriasis Council1Treated for psoriasis with any biologicsCOVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
High risk, no CSSDepends on situationHigh risk: >60 y, comorbidities (CVD, DM, hepatitis B, COPD, CKD, cancer)
Price KN et al2Treated with anti–TNF-α antibodyNo CSS or mild CSSContinuation
CSS worsening or high feverDiscontinuation
Treated with anti–IL-4/13 antibodyMild to moderate CSSContinuation
Severe CSSDiscontinuation
Treated with anti–IL-17, anti–IL-12/23, and anti–IL-23 antibodyNo CSS or mild CSSContinuation
CSS worsening or high feverDiscontinuation
American Academy of Dermatology3Treated with any biologicsNo CSSContinuation
High risk, no CSSDepends on situationPostponement or change to alternative agentHigh risk: >60 y, comorbidities (CVD, DM, severe HTN, liver disease, kidney disease, pulmonary disease, cancer), current smoker
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation or postponement
Australian Medical Dermatology Group4Treated with any biologicsNo CSSContinuationDepends on situation
High risk, no CSSDiscontinuation or dose reductionHigh risk: >60 y, uncontrolled or multiple comorbidities (CVD, CKD, DM, HTN, cancer), high dose or multiple use of other immunosuppressive agent, history of severe/recurrent respiratory tract infection
CSSDiscontinuation or dose reduction
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation or postponement (if next injection is scheduled within 31 d)
Brownstone ND et al5Treated for psoriasis with any biologicsHigh risk, no CSSDiscontinuation or dose reductionHigh risk: elderly, CVD, HTN, lung disease, DM, cancer, concomitant use of other immunosuppressive agent, immunosuppressive state (HIV), history of infection during biologics treatment
Exposure to COVID-19–infected patientDiscontinuation or dose reduction
COVID-19 infectedHolding a dose
Amerio P et al6Treated with any biologicsNo CSSContinuation
High risk and CSSDiscontinuationHigh risk: elderly with comorbidities (HTN, DM, obesity)
High risk and exposure to COVID-19–infected patientDiscontinuationHigh risk: elderly with comorbidities (HTN, DM, obesity)
Reynolds SD et al7All biologics-treated childrenNo CSSContinuation
CSSDepends on situationFor dupilumab, 50% of experts agree to continue
High risk and exposure to COVID-19–infected patientDiscontinuation or depends on situationFor dupilumab, 50% of experts agree to continue
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuationFor dupilumab, 16% of experts agree to continue
Conforti C et al8All biologics treatedCOVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
Patruno C et al9Anti–IL-4/13 antibody treatedNo CSSContinuation
Sanchez DP et al10All biologics treatedCSSHolding a dose
No CSSContinuationChange to self-injectable agent/home infusion (if possible)Enhancement of self-isolation for patients treated with secukinumab and adalimumab
Galimberti F et al11All biologics treatedNo CSSContinuationPostponement
CSSDiscontinuation
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
Ricardo JW et al12Anti–TNF-α antibody treatedCOVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
No CSSChange to alternative agent
Anti–IL-17 antibody treatedNo CSSContinuation
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
Anti–IL-12/23 antibody treatedNo CSSContinuationRefrain from changing to anti–IL-23 antibody if possible
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
Anti–IL-23 antibody treatedNo CSSContinuationPossible
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation
Anti–IL-4/13 antibody treatedNo CSSContinuationPossible
Karadag AS et al13Anti–IL-12/23 and Anti–IL-23 antibody treatedNo CSSContinuationUse the lowest dose (if possible)
International League of Dermatological Societies14All biologics for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis treatedNo CSSContinuation
High risk, no CSSDepends on situationHigh risk: elderly, comorbidities (DM, COPD, HTN, CKD, liver disease, cancer except for keratinocyte carcinoma)
CSSChange to alternative agentPostponement
COVID-19 infectedDiscontinuation

CKD, Chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CSS, COVID-19 suspected symptom; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Search of PubMed with following keywords: biologics (“anti–TNF-α antibody,” “etanercept,” “infliximab,” “adalimumab,” “certolizumab pegol,” “anti–interleukin-12/23 antibody,” “anti–interleukin-23 antibody,” “ustekinumab,” “guselkumab,” “tildrakizumab,” “risankizumab,” “anti–interleukin-17 antibody,” “secukinumab,” “ixekizumab,” “brodalumab,” “anti–interleukin-4/13 antibody,” “dupilumab,” “anti-IgE antibody,” “omalizumab,” or “biologic”) and COVID-19 (“SARS-CoV2,” “novel coronavirus infection,” or “COVID-19”). Listed in order of publication date. 1. International Psoriasis Council. IPC Statement on the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak (accessed 26th Jul 2020, updated Mar 2020). https://www.psoriasiscouncil.org/blog/Statement-on-COVID-19-and-Psoriasis.htm. 2. Price KN et al. COVID-19 and immunomodulator/immunosuppressant use in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):e173-e175. 3. American Academy of Dermatology. Recommendations for dermatologists (accessed 26th Jul 2020, updated Apr 2020). https://www.aad.org/member/practice/coronavirus/clinical-guidance/recommendations. 4. Australian Medical Dermatology Group. COVID-19 and the use of immunomodulatory and biologic agents for severe cutaneous disease: an Australian/New Zealand consensus statement. Australas J Dermatol. 2020;61(3):210-216. 5. Brownstone ND et al. Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and biologic therapy in psoriasis: infection risk and patient counseling in uncertain times. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020;10(3):1-11. 6. Amerio P et al. COVID-19 and psoriasis: should we fear for patients treated with biologics? Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13434. 7. Reynolds SD et al. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory skin diseases in children: expert consensus-based guidance for clinical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37(3):424-434. 8. Conforti C et al. Biologic therapy for psoriasis during the COVID-19 outbreak: the choice is to weigh risks and benefits. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13490. 9. Patruno C et al. Dupilumab and COVID-19: what should we expect? Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13502. 10. Sanchez DP et al. Clinical considerations for managing dermatology patients on systemic immunosuppressive or biologic therapy, or both, during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):288-292. 11. Galimberti F et al. Evidenced-based best practice advice for patients treated with systemic immunosuppressants in relation to COVID-19. Clin Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.05.003. 12. Ricardo JW et al. Considerations for safety in the use of systemic medications for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13687. 13. Karadag AS et al. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulator therapy for rare or uncommon skin disorders in pandemic days. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13686. 14. International League of Dermatological Societies. Guidance on the use of systemic therapy for patients with psoriasis/atopic dermatitis during the Covid-19 (Sars-Cov-2, coronavirus) pandemic (accessed 26th Jul 2020, updated May 2020). https://ilds.org/covid-19/guidance-psoriasis-atopic-dermatitis.

Expert opinion∗ or official statement for recommendation of biologics use in dermatologic patients CKD, Chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CSS, COVID-19 suspected symptom; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Search of PubMed with following keywords: biologics (“anti–TNF-α antibody,” “etanercept,” “infliximab,” “adalimumab,” “certolizumab pegol,” “anti–interleukin-12/23 antibody,” “anti–interleukin-23 antibody,” “ustekinumab,” “guselkumab,” “tildrakizumab,” “risankizumab,” “anti–interleukin-17 antibody,” “secukinumab,” “ixekizumab,” “brodalumab,” “anti–interleukin-4/13 antibody,” “dupilumab,” “anti-IgE antibody,” “omalizumab,” or “biologic”) and COVID-19 (“SARS-CoV2,” “novel coronavirus infection,” or “COVID-19”). Listed in order of publication date. 1. International Psoriasis Council. IPC Statement on the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak (accessed 26th Jul 2020, updated Mar 2020). https://www.psoriasiscouncil.org/blog/Statement-on-COVID-19-and-Psoriasis.htm. 2. Price KN et al. COVID-19 and immunomodulator/immunosuppressant use in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):e173-e175. 3. American Academy of Dermatology. Recommendations for dermatologists (accessed 26th Jul 2020, updated Apr 2020). https://www.aad.org/member/practice/coronavirus/clinical-guidance/recommendations. 4. Australian Medical Dermatology Group. COVID-19 and the use of immunomodulatory and biologic agents for severe cutaneous disease: an Australian/New Zealand consensus statement. Australas J Dermatol. 2020;61(3):210-216. 5. Brownstone ND et al. Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and biologic therapy in psoriasis: infection risk and patient counseling in uncertain times. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020;10(3):1-11. 6. Amerio P et al. COVID-19 and psoriasis: should we fear for patients treated with biologics? Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13434. 7. Reynolds SD et al. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory skin diseases in children: expert consensus-based guidance for clinical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37(3):424-434. 8. Conforti C et al. Biologic therapy for psoriasis during the COVID-19 outbreak: the choice is to weigh risks and benefits. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13490. 9. Patruno C et al. Dupilumab and COVID-19: what should we expect? Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13502. 10. Sanchez DP et al. Clinical considerations for managing dermatology patients on systemic immunosuppressive or biologic therapy, or both, during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):288-292. 11. Galimberti F et al. Evidenced-based best practice advice for patients treated with systemic immunosuppressants in relation to COVID-19. Clin Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.05.003. 12. Ricardo JW et al. Considerations for safety in the use of systemic medications for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13687. 13. Karadag AS et al. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulator therapy for rare or uncommon skin disorders in pandemic days. Dermatol Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13686. 14. International League of Dermatological Societies. Guidance on the use of systemic therapy for patients with psoriasis/atopic dermatitis during the Covid-19 (Sars-Cov-2, coronavirus) pandemic (accessed 26th Jul 2020, updated May 2020). https://ilds.org/covid-19/guidance-psoriasis-atopic-dermatitis. In conclusion, with advances in the understanding of COVID-19 pathogenesis and opposing suggestions of certain biologics as an alternative treatment option for COVID-19 disease,, it will be necessary for guidelines about biologics use to be consistently modified and integrated at the pannational level in the COVID-19 era. Moreover, the guidelines need to be tailored to each condition, considering the differences in the prevalence of COVID-19, the incidence of pulmonary complications, quarantine policy, and insurance coverage of biologics between countries.
  5 in total

1.  COVID-19 and biologics for psoriasis: A high-epidemic area experience-Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy.

Authors:  Andrea Carugno; Daniele Mario Gambini; Francesca Raponi; Pamela Vezzoli; Andrea Gustavo C Locatelli; Marco Di Mercurio; Elisa Robustelli Test; Paolo Sena
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  The risk of respiratory tract infections and symptoms in psoriasis patients treated with interleukin 17 pathway-inhibiting biologics: A meta-estimate of pivotal trials relevant to decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Marilyn T Wan; Daniel B Shin; Kevin L Winthrop; Joel M Gelfand
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  COVID-19: a case for inhibiting IL-17?

Authors:  Omar Pacha; Mary Alice Sallman; Scott E Evans
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 4.  Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: A single center study of 100 patients in Brescia, Italy.

Authors:  Paola Toniati; Simone Piva; Marco Cattalini; Emirena Garrafa; Francesca Regola; Francesco Castelli; Franco Franceschini; Paolo Airò; Chiara Bazzani; Eva-Andrea Beindorf; Marialma Berlendis; Michela Bezzi; Nicola Bossini; Maurizio Castellano; Sergio Cattaneo; Ilaria Cavazzana; Giovanni-Battista Contessi; Massimo Crippa; Andrea Delbarba; Elena De Peri; Angela Faletti; Matteo Filippini; Matteo Filippini; Micol Frassi; Mario Gaggiotti; Roberto Gorla; Michael Lanspa; Silvia Lorenzotti; Rosa Marino; Roberto Maroldi; Marco Metra; Alberto Matteelli; Denise Modina; Giovanni Moioli; Giovanni Montani; Maria-Lorenza Muiesan; Silvia Odolini; Elena Peli; Silvia Pesenti; Maria-Chiara Pezzoli; Ilenia Pirola; Alessandro Pozzi; Alessandro Proto; Francesco-Antonio Rasulo; Giulia Renisi; Chiara Ricci; Damiano Rizzoni; Giuseppe Romanelli; Mara Rossi; Massimo Salvetti; Francesco Scolari; Liana Signorini; Marco Taglietti; Gabriele Tomasoni; Lina-Rachele Tomasoni; Fabio Turla; Alberto Valsecchi; Davide Zani; Francesco Zuccalà; Fiammetta Zunica; Emanuele Focà; Laura Andreoli; Nicola Latronico
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 9.754

5.  Should biologics for psoriasis be interrupted in the era of COVID-19?

Authors:  Mark Lebwohl; Ryan Rivera-Oyola; Dedee F Murrell
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 11.527

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.