| Literature DB >> 34173456 |
Dominic Loske1,2.
Abstract
Governmental restrictions aspiring to slow down the spread of epidemic and pandemic outbreaks lead to impairments for economic operations, which impact transportation networks comprising the maritime, rail, air, and trucking industries. Witnessing a substantial increase in the number of infections in Germany, the authorities have imposed drastic restrictions on everyday life. Resulting panic buying and increasing home consumption had versatile impacts on transport volume and freight capacity dynamics in German food retail logistics. Due to the lack of prior research on the effects of COVID-19 on transport volume in retail logistics, as well as resulting implications, this article aspires to shed light on the phenomenon of changing volume and capacity dynamics in road haulage. After analyzing the transport volume of n = 15,715 routes in the timeframe of 23.03.2020 to 30.04.2020, a transport volume growth rate expressing the difference of real and expected transport volume was calculated. This ratio was then examined concerning the number of COVID-19 infections per day. The results of this study prove that the increasing freight volume for dry products in retail logistics does not depend on the duration of the COVID-19 epidemy but on the strength quantified through the total number of new infections per day. This causes a conflict of interest between transportation companies and food retail logistics for non-cooled transport capacity. The contributions of this paper are highly relevant to assess the impact of a possibly occurring second COVID-19 virus infection wave.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Freight capacity; Pandemic disease; Retail logistics; Transport volume
Year: 2020 PMID: 34173456 PMCID: PMC7330557 DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect
Fig. 1Theoretical framework for epidemic outbreaks and transportation research.
Fig. 2Development of the total transport volume in the examined time period.
Correlation matrix for independent (2–5) and dependent(6–10) transport volume variables.
| (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of new cases (2) | 1.00 | −0.70 | −0.21 | −0.80 | 0.77 | 0.38 | −0.08 | −0.34 | −0.15 |
| Cumulated cases (3) | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.95 | −0.70 | −0.73 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.25 | |
| Number of new deaths (4) | 1.00 | 0.54 | −0.45 | −0.55 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
| Cumulated deaths (5) | 1.00 | −0.73 | −0.65 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.32 | |||
| Dry products (6) | 1.00 | 0.52 | −0.03 | −0.22 | −0.20 | ||||
| Frozen products (7) | 1.00 | −0.15 | −0.19 | −0.27 | |||||
| Fruits and vegetables (8) | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.36 | ||||||
| Dairy products (9) | 1.00 | 0.28 | |||||||
| Fish and meat (10) | 1.00 |
Results of linear regression analysis for transport volume growth and new COVID-19 cases.
| Dependent variables: transport volume growth per assortment group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry products | Frozen products | Fruits and vegetables | Dairy products | Raw fish and meat | |
| New COVID-19 cases | −0.193 | −0.073 | −0.043 | 0.641 | 0.201 |
| (0.061) | (0.051) | (0.071) | (0.204) | (0.115) | |
| Observations | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 |
| R2 | 0.592 | 0.145 | 0.007 | 0.118 | 0.024 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.581 | 0.122 | −0.020 | 0.094 | −0.003 |
| Residual std. error (df = 37) | 0.157 | 0.130 | 0.183 | 0.525 | 0.296 |
| f statistic (df = 1; 37) | 53.748 | 6.263 | 0.257 | 4.944 | 0.893 |
p < 0.01.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.01.
Fig. 3Results of regression analysis for new COVID-19 cases and transport volume of dry products.
Fig. 4Results of regression analysis for new COVID-19 cases and transport volume growth rate.
Fig. 5Residuals versus fitted and normal Q-Q for linear regression analysis.
Fig. 6Scale-location and residual versus leverage for linear regression analysis.
Fig. 7System dynamics framework for the impact of COVID-19 on transport volume and demand.