Sami Al-Nawaiseh1, Annekatrin Rickmann1,2, Anna-Maria Seuthe1, Dalia Al-Rimawi3, Boris Viktor Stanzel1,2, Peter Szurman1,2. 1. Department of ophthalmology, Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaftsklinikum Saar, Sulzbach, Germany. 2. Department of ophthalmology, Klaus Heimann Eye Research Institute (KHERI), Sulzbach, Germany; and. 3. Biostatistics Unit, Research Office, King Hussein Cancer Foundation and Center, Center for Research Shared Resources, Bio-statistics and Data Science, Amman, Jordan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine a statistically optimal limit of adhesion size in vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome for ocriplasmin treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective, consecutive, interventional study, we included 106 patients treated with ocriplasmin injection because of VMT between July 2013 and January 2018. A univariate and multivariate risk analysis was performed with grouped factors and continuous factors. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve to measure the prognostic relevance of each continuous factor for therapy success and determined the statistically optimal cutoff value at which specificity and sensitivity are simultaneously maximized. RESULTS: Among the grouped factors, only a phakic lens status showed a highly significant positive influence on the resolution of the VMT. For the continuous factors, only the adhesion diameter before injection was a good predictor of anatomical success. The statistically optimal threshold value for the adhesion size was calculated to be 480 µm. Eyes below this limit had a 6.84-fold better chance of VMT resolution compared with eyes with a larger adhesion diameter. CONCLUSION: The threshold value of the VMT diameter for ocriplasmin therapy could be statistically defined as 480 µm and may thus be a new quantitative biomarker to predict treatment success.
PURPOSE: To determine a statistically optimal limit of adhesion size in vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome for ocriplasmin treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective, consecutive, interventional study, we included 106 patients treated with ocriplasmin injection because of VMT between July 2013 and January 2018. A univariate and multivariate risk analysis was performed with grouped factors and continuous factors. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve to measure the prognostic relevance of each continuous factor for therapy success and determined the statistically optimal cutoff value at which specificity and sensitivity are simultaneously maximized. RESULTS: Among the grouped factors, only a phakic lens status showed a highly significant positive influence on the resolution of the VMT. For the continuous factors, only the adhesion diameter before injection was a good predictor of anatomical success. The statistically optimal threshold value for the adhesion size was calculated to be 480 µm. Eyes below this limit had a 6.84-fold better chance of VMT resolution compared with eyes with a larger adhesion diameter. CONCLUSION: The threshold value of the VMT diameter for ocriplasmin therapy could be statistically defined as 480 µm and may thus be a new quantitative biomarker to predict treatment success.