Arnoldo Piccardo1, Gianluca Bottoni1, Luis Alejandro Boccalatte2, Chiara Camponovo3, Martina Musumeci4, Lorenzo Bacigalupo5, Carlos Collaud4, Martina Ugolini1, Francesco Fiz6, Pierpaolo Trimboli7,3. 1. Nuclear Medicine Department, Ente Ospedaliero "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Clinic of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Lugano and Mendrisio Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland. 4. Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nuclear Medicine/PET-CT, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Radiology Department, Ente Ospedaliero "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy. 6. Nuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. francesco.fiz.nm@gmail.com. 7. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), the localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland (HPTG) allows tailored surgery. Although Four-Dimensional Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (4DCeCT) and 18F-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) are reported to be promising second-line imaging procedures, no meta-analysis of their comparison exists. DESIGN: we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to find original papers reporting the head-to-head comparison of 4DCeCT, 18F-choline PET/CT and integrated 18F-choline-PET/4DCeCT. METHODS: this systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA. PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until January 2021. Studies comparing the ability of 4DCeCT, 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT to identify HPTG in patients with PHPT were selected. A per patient-based analysis of the three procedures was conducted in all patients (detection rate, DR) and in those with histologically confirmed HPTG (sensitivity). RESULTS: Of the 78 records identified, five articles (153 PHPT patients) published between January the 1st, 2018 and January the 31st, 2021 were included. The pooled DR of 18F-choline PET/CT, 4DCeCT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT was 0.86, 0.69, and 0.86, respectively, while their pooled sensitivity was 0.89, 0.77 and 0.93, respectively. The analysis of pooled discrepancy showed that the sensitivity of 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT was higher than that of 4DCeCT by 0.11 and 0.13, respectively, the sensitivity of 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT being 0.06 higher than that of 18F-Choline PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the sensitivity of 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT is higher than that of 4DCeCT, while only a slight difference was observed between 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT.
INTRODUCTION: In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), the localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland (HPTG) allows tailored surgery. Although Four-Dimensional Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (4DCeCT) and 18F-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) are reported to be promising second-line imaging procedures, no meta-analysis of their comparison exists. DESIGN: we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to find original papers reporting the head-to-head comparison of 4DCeCT, 18F-choline PET/CT and integrated 18F-choline-PET/4DCeCT. METHODS: this systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA. PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until January 2021. Studies comparing the ability of 4DCeCT, 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT to identify HPTG in patients with PHPT were selected. A per patient-based analysis of the three procedures was conducted in all patients (detection rate, DR) and in those with histologically confirmed HPTG (sensitivity). RESULTS: Of the 78 records identified, five articles (153 PHPT patients) published between January the 1st, 2018 and January the 31st, 2021 were included. The pooled DR of 18F-choline PET/CT, 4DCeCT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT was 0.86, 0.69, and 0.86, respectively, while their pooled sensitivity was 0.89, 0.77 and 0.93, respectively. The analysis of pooled discrepancy showed that the sensitivity of 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT was higher than that of 4DCeCT by 0.11 and 0.13, respectively, the sensitivity of 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT being 0.06 higher than that of 18F-Choline PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the sensitivity of 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT is higher than that of 4DCeCT, while only a slight difference was observed between 18F-choline PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/4DCeCT.
Authors: Naykky M Singh Ospina; Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez; Spyridoula Maraka; Ana E Espinosa de Ycaza; Sina Jasim; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Michael R Gionfriddo; Alaa Al Nofal; Juan P Brito; Patricia Erwin; Melanie Richards; Robert Wermers; Victor M Montori Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: John P Bilezikian; Maria Luisa Brandi; Richard Eastell; Shonni J Silverberg; Robert Udelsman; Claudio Marcocci; John T Potts Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Moska Hamidi; Michael Sullivan; George Hunter; Leena Hamberg; Nancy L Cho; Atul A Gawande; Gerard M Doherty; Francis D Moore; Matthew A Nehs Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Adrien Latge; Sophie Riehm; Michel Vix; Jacob Bani; Mihaela Ignat; Valentin Pretet; Mehdi Helali; Giorgio Treglia; Alessio Imperiale Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-17