| Literature DB >> 34173042 |
Arimatias Raitio1, Nelly Kalliokoski2, Johanna Syvänen2, Samuli Harju3, Asta Tauriainen2, Anna Hyvärinen4, Mika Gissler5,6, Ilkka Helenius7, Ulla Sankilampi8.
Abstract
The aim of this nationwide population-based case-control study was to assess the incidence of inguinal hernia (IH) among patients with congenital abdominal wall defects. All infants born with congenital abdominal wall defects between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2014, were identified in the Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations. Six controls matched for gestational age, sex, and year of birth were selected for each case in the Medical Birth Register. The Finnish Hospital Discharge Register was searched for relevant diagnosis codes for IH, and hernia incidence was compared between cases and controls. We identified 178 infants with gastroschisis and 150 with omphalocele and selected randomly 1968 matched, healthy controls for comparison. Incidence of IH was significantly higher in gastroschisis girls than in matched controls, relative risk (RR) 7.20 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-23.07). In boys with gastroschisis, no statistically significant difference was observed, RR 1.60 (95% CI 0.75-3.38). Omphalocele was associated with higher risk of IH compared to matched controls, RR 6.46 (95% CI 3.90-10.71), and the risk was equally elevated in male and female patients.Entities:
Keywords: Exomphalos; Gastroschisis; Inguinal hernia; Omphalocele
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34173042 PMCID: PMC8285311 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04172-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pediatr ISSN: 0340-6199 Impact factor: 3.183
Incidence of inguinal hernia among female patients with gastroschisis was significantly higher than their matched controls. Values given as median and range
| All | Females | Males | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastroschisis, | Control, | Gastroschisis, | Control, | Gastroschisis, | Control, | ||||
| Gestational age (weeks) | 36.7, (27.6–40.3) | 36.8, (26.6–40.3) | 0.88 | 36.6, (29.0–40.1) | 36.6, (28.4–40.1) | 0.99 | 36.9, (27.6–40.3) | 36.9, (26.6–40.3) | 0.83 |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 0.2 (0.0–4.8) | 0.7, (0.1–5.4) | 0.10 | 0.3 (0.1–0.6) | 0.4 (0.2–2.1) | 0.27 | 0.2 (0.0–4.8) | 0.8 (0.1–5.4) | 0.17 |
| Inguinal hernia cases (%) | 14 (7.9%) | 35 (3.3%) | 0.01 | 6 (7.0%) | 5 (1.0%) | 0.002 | 8 (8.7%) | 30 (5.4%) | 0.23 |
| Relative risk (95% confidence interval) | 2.40 (1.32–4.37) | 7.20 (2.25–23.07) | 1.60 (0.75–3.38) | ||||||
Incidence of inguinal hernia among omphalocele patients was significantly higher than among their matched controls. Values given as median and range
| All | Females | Males | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omphalocele, | Control, | Omphalocele, | Control, | Omphalocele, | Control, | ||||
| Gestational age (weeks) | 38.6 (23.4–42.3) | 38.6 (23.4–42.3) | 0.90 | 38.7 (23.4–41.3) | 38.7 (23.4–41.3) | 0.99 | 38.4 (27.4–42.3) | 38.4 (26.6–42.3) | 0.86 |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 0.2 (0.1–8.3) | 0.3 (0.0–7.2) | 0.18 | 1.7 (0.3–4.8) | 2.3 (0.5–4.6) | 0.83 | 0.2 (0.1–8.3) | 0.3 (0.0–7.3) | 0.18 |
| Inguinal hernia cases (%) | 28 (18.7%) | 26 (2.9%) | < 0.0001 | 3 (4.5%) | 3 (0.8%) | 0.04 | 25 (30.1%) | 23 (4.6%) | < 0.0001 |
| Relative Risk (95% Confidence Interval) | 6.46 (3.90–10.71) | 6.00 (1.24–29.11) | 6.52 (3.89–10.93) | ||||||