Esther T van der Werf1,2, Martine Busch3,4, Miek C Jong5,6, H J Rogier Hoenders3,7. 1. Louis Bolk Institute, Bunnik, The Netherlands. e.vanderwerf@louisbolk.nl. 2. Dutch Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.vanderwerf@louisbolk.nl. 3. Dutch Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Van Praag Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 6. Mid Sweden University, Department of Health Sciences, Sundsvall, Sweden. 7. Center for Integrative Psychiatry (CIP), Lentis Mental Health Institution, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the Covid-19 pandemic the Dutch government implemented its so-called 'intelligent lockdown' in which people were urged to leave their homes as little as possible and work from home. This life changing event may have caused changes in lifestyle behaviour, an important factor in the onset and course of diseases. The overarching aim of this study is to determine life-style related changes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic among a representative sample of the adult population in the Netherlands. METHODS: Life-style related changes were studied among a random representative sample of the adult population in the Netherlands using an online survey conducted from 22 to 27 May 2020. Differences in COVID-19-related lifestyle changes between Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) users and non-CAM users were determined. The survey included a modified version of the I-CAM-Q and 26 questions on lifestyle related measures, anxiety, and need for support to maintain lifestyle changes. RESULTS: 1004 respondents were included in the study, aged between 18 and 88 years (50.7% females). Changes to a healthier lifestyle were observed in 19.3% of the population, mainly due to a change in diet habits, physical activity and relaxation, of whom 56.2% reported to be motivated to maintain this behaviour change in a post-COVID-19 era. Fewer respondents (12.3%) changed into an unhealthier lifestyle. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that changing into a healthier lifestyle was positively associated with the variables 'Worried/Anxious getting COVID-19' (OR: 1.56, 95% C.I. 1.26-1.93), 'CAM use' (OR: 2.04, 95% C.I. 1.38-3.02) and 'stress in relation to financial situation' (OR: 1.89, 95% C.I. 1.30-2.74). 'Age' (OR 18-25: 1.00, OR 25-40: 0.55, 95% C.I. 0.31-0.96, OR 40-55:0.50 95% C.I. 0.28-0.87 OR 55+: 0.1095% C.I. 0.10-0.33), 'stress in relation to health' (OR: 2.52, 95% C.I. 1.64-3.86) and 'stress in relation to the balance work and home' (OR: 1.69, 95% C.I. 1.11-2.57) were found predicting the change into an unhealthier direction. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the coronavirus crisis resulted in a healthier lifestyle in one part and, to a lesser extent, in an unhealthier lifestyle in another part of the Dutch population. Further studies are warranted to see whether this behavioural change is maintained over time, and how different lifestyle factors can affect the susceptibility for and the course of COVID-19.
BACKGROUND: During the Covid-19 pandemic the Dutch government implemented its so-called 'intelligent lockdown' in which people were urged to leave their homes as little as possible and work from home. This life changing event may have caused changes in lifestyle behaviour, an important factor in the onset and course of diseases. The overarching aim of this study is to determine life-style related changes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic among a representative sample of the adult population in the Netherlands. METHODS: Life-style related changes were studied among a random representative sample of the adult population in the Netherlands using an online survey conducted from 22 to 27 May 2020. Differences in COVID-19-related lifestyle changes between Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) users and non-CAM users were determined. The survey included a modified version of the I-CAM-Q and 26 questions on lifestyle related measures, anxiety, and need for support to maintain lifestyle changes. RESULTS: 1004 respondents were included in the study, aged between 18 and 88 years (50.7% females). Changes to a healthier lifestyle were observed in 19.3% of the population, mainly due to a change in diet habits, physical activity and relaxation, of whom 56.2% reported to be motivated to maintain this behaviour change in a post-COVID-19 era. Fewer respondents (12.3%) changed into an unhealthier lifestyle. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that changing into a healthier lifestyle was positively associated with the variables 'Worried/Anxious getting COVID-19' (OR: 1.56, 95% C.I. 1.26-1.93), 'CAM use' (OR: 2.04, 95% C.I. 1.38-3.02) and 'stress in relation to financial situation' (OR: 1.89, 95% C.I. 1.30-2.74). 'Age' (OR 18-25: 1.00, OR 25-40: 0.55, 95% C.I. 0.31-0.96, OR 40-55:0.50 95% C.I. 0.28-0.87 OR 55+: 0.1095% C.I. 0.10-0.33), 'stress in relation to health' (OR: 2.52, 95% C.I. 1.64-3.86) and 'stress in relation to the balance work and home' (OR: 1.69, 95% C.I. 1.11-2.57) were found predicting the change into an unhealthier direction. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the coronavirus crisis resulted in a healthier lifestyle in one part and, to a lesser extent, in an unhealthier lifestyle in another part of the Dutch population. Further studies are warranted to see whether this behavioural change is maintained over time, and how different lifestyle factors can affect the susceptibility for and the course of COVID-19.
Authors: Elina Engberg; Markku Alen; Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula; Juha E Peltonen; Heikki O Tikkanen; Heikki Pekkarinen Journal: Sports Med Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Richard L Nahin; James M Dahlhamer; Beth L Taylor; Patricia M Barnes; Barbara J Stussman; Catherine M Simile; Marc R Blackman; Margaret A Chesney; Morgan Jackson; Heather Miller; Kim K McFann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Khaled Trabelsi; Achraf Ammar; Liwa Masmoudi; Omar Boukhris; Hamdi Chtourou; Bassem Bouaziz; Michael Brach; Ellen Bentlage; Daniella How; Mona Ahmed; Patrick Mueller; Notger Mueller; Hsen Hsouna; Yousri Elghoul; Mohamed Romdhani; Omar Hammouda; Laisa Liane Paineiras-Domingos; Annemarie Braakman-Jansen; Christian Wrede; Sofia Bastoni; Carlos Soares Pernambuco; Leonardo Jose Mataruna-Dos-Santos; Morteza Taheri; Khadijeh Irandoust; Nicola L Bragazzi; Jana Strahler; Jad Adrian Washif; Albina Andreeva; Stephen J Bailey; Jarred Acton; Emma Mitchell; Nicholas T Bott; Faiez Gargouri; Lotfi Chaari; Hadj Batatia; Samira C Khoshnami; Evangelia Samara; Vasiliki Zisi; Parasanth Sankar; Waseem N Ahmed; Gamal Mohamed Ali; Osama Abdelkarim; Mohamed Jarraya; Kais El Abed; Wassim Moalla; Nafaa Souissi; Asma Aloui; Nizar Souissi; Lisette Van Gemert-Pijnen; Bryan L Riemann; Laurel Riemann; Jan Delhey; Jonathan Gómez-Raja; Monique Epstein; Robbert Sanderman; Sebastian Schulz; Achim Jerg; Ramzi Al-Horani; Taysir Mansi; Ismail Dergaa; Mohamed Jmail; Fernando Barbosa; Fernando Ferreira-Santos; Boštjan Šimunič; Rado Pišot; Saša Pišot; Andrea Gaggioli; Jürgen Steinacker; Piotr Zmijewski; Christian Apfelbacher; Jordan M Glenn; Aïmen Khacharem; Cain C T Clark; Helmi Ben Saad; Karim Chamari; Tarak Driss; Anita Hoekelmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lisa Waterink; Els D Bakker; Leonie N C Visser; Francesca Mangialasche; Miia Kivipelto; Kay Deckers; Sebastian Köhler; Sietske A M Sikkes; Niels D Prins; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier; Marissa D Zwan Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi; Kleo Evripidou; Ranil Jayawardena; João Breda; Theodoros Dardavessis; Kalliopi-Anna Poulia; Michail Chourdakis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Nailya Bulatova; Sara Younes; Majd Arabiyat; Ahmad Abukaff; Sara Madanat; Eman Alqudah; Anoud Hamati; Farah Halawa; Abdallah Younes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Britta Müller; Charly Gaul; Änne Glass; Olaf Reis; Tim P Jürgens; Peter Kropp; Ruth Ruscheweyh; Andreas Straube; Elmar Brähler; Stefanie Förderreuther; Thomas Dresler Journal: Pain Ther Date: 2022-02-25
Authors: Lidia Cobos-Palacios; Mónica Muñoz-Úbeda; Maria Isabel Ruiz-Moreno; Alberto Vilches-Perez; Antonio Vargas-Candela; Javier Benítez-Porres; Ana Navarro-Sanz; Maria Dolores Lopez-Carmona; Luis Miguel Pérez-Belmonte; Jaime Sanz-Canovas; Ricardo Gomez-Huelgas; Maria Rosa Bernal-Lopez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Louise T C Mulder; Martine Busch; Agnete E Kristoffersen; Johanna Hök Nordberg; Esther T van der Werf Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther Date: 2022-02-15