Literature DB >> 34171922

Comparing outcomes in patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: single versus bilateral lung transplants.

Sudeep Mutyala1,2, M Abul Kashem1,2, Jay Kanaparthi1,2, Gengo Sunagawa1,2, Manish Suryapalam2, Eros Leotta1,2, Kenji Minakata1,2, Stacey Brann1,2, Norihisa Shigemura1,2, Yoshiya Toyoda1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Debate continues on whether a bilateral (BLT) or a single lung transplantation (SLT) is preferred for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this study is to examine the interplay between patient age and transplant type on survival outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of lung transplants for COPD at our centre from February 2012 to March 2020 (n = 186). Demographics and clinical parameters were compared between patients based on their age (≤65 vs >65 years old) and type of transplant (single vs bilateral). Cox proportional hazards regression was also performed. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: Of the 186 patients with COPD who received lung transplants, 71 (38.2%) received BLTs and 115 (61.8%) received SLTs. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes when looking at patients with single versus BLTs (P = 0.870). There was also no difference in survival between the 2 age groups ≤65 versus > 65 years (P = 0.723). The Cox model itself also did not show a statistically significant improvement in survival outcomes (P = 0.126).
CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplant outcomes in patients with end-stage COPD demonstrated non-inferior results in patients with an SLT compared to patients with a BLT. When we compared the age groups, neither transplant type showed superior survival benefits, suggesting there may be some utility in an SLT in younger recipients. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral lung transplantation; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Single lung transplantation; Survival outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34171922      PMCID: PMC8923376          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  18 in total

1.  Sex differences in thoracic dimensions and configuration.

Authors:  François Bellemare; Alphonse Jeanneret; Jacques Couture
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Relationship of height to lung volume in healthy men.

Authors:  N G HEPPER; W S FOWLER; H F HELMHOLZ
Journal:  Dis Chest       Date:  1960-03

3.  Impact of bilateral versus single lung transplantation on survival in recipients 60 years of age and older: analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing database.

Authors:  Lois U Nwakanma; Christopher E Simpkins; Jason A Williams; David C Chang; Marvin C Borja; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Which Shall I Choose? Lung Transplantation Listing Preference for Individuals with Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Kathleen J Ramos; Michael O Harhay; Michael S Mulligan
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-02

Review 5.  Bilateral versus single lung transplantation: are two lungs better than one?

Authors:  Melanie P Subramanian; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Lung size mismatch and survival after single and bilateral lung transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Eberlein; Robert M Reed; Servet Bolukbas; Kalpaj R Parekh; George J Arnaoutakis; Jonathan B Orens; Roy G Brower; Ashish S Shah; Lawrence Hunsicker; Christian A Merlo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Continued Utility of Single-Lung Transplantation in Select Populations: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Daine T Bennett; Martin Zamora; T Brett Reece; John D Mitchell; Joseph C Cleveland; Frederick L Grover; Ashok N Babu; Robert A Meguid; David A Fullerton; Michael J Weyant
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. ATS Workshop on Lung Volume Measurements. Official Statement of The European Respiratory Society.

Authors:  J Stocks; P H Quanjer
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Five-Year Mortality Hazard Is Reduced In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Receiving Double- versus Single-Lung Transplants.

Authors:  Todd C Crawford; Cecillia Lui; J Trent Magruder; Jinny S Ha; Robert S Higgins; Christian A Merlo; Bo S Kim; Errol L Bush
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth adult lung and heart-lung transplantation Report-2019; Focus theme: Donor and recipient size match.

Authors:  Daniel C Chambers; Wida S Cherikh; Michael O Harhay; Don Hayes; Eileen Hsich; Kiran K Khush; Bruno Meiser; Luciano Potena; Joseph W Rossano; Alice E Toll; Tajinder P Singh; Aparna Sadavarte; Andreas Zuckermann; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.