N C Casartelli1, N A Maffiuletti2, P L Valenzuela3, A Grassi4, E Ferrari5, M M A van Buuren6, M C Nevitt7, M Leunig8, R Agricola6. 1. Human Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland; Laboratory of Exercise and Health, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland. 2. Human Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: nicola.maffiuletti@kws.ch. 3. Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. 4. Human Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Human Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 6. Department of Orthopedics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. 8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To appraise the highest evidence on hip morphology as a risk factor for developing hip osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: We searched for studies evaluating the association between radiological hip morphology parameters and the prevalence, incidence or progression of hip OA (based on different radiographic and clinical criteria) in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PEDro databases from inception until June 2020. Prospective and cross-sectional studies were separately evaluated. Data are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 9 prospective and 21 cross-sectional studies in the meta-analysis, and evaluated 42,831 hips from 25,898 individuals (mean age: 59 years). Prospective studies showed that, compared with control hips, hips with cam morphology (alpha angle >60°; OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.83 to 3.46, P < 0.001) or hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25°; OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.84 to 3.07, P < 0.001), but not hips with pincer morphology (LCEA >39°; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.57 to 2.07, P = 0.810), were more likely to develop hip OA than hips without these morphologies. Cross-sectional studies showed a greater prevalence of pincer morphology (LCEA >39°, OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 2.98 to 4.61, P < 0.001) and acetabular retroversion (crossover sign; OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.17 to 6.03, P = 0.020) in hips with OA than in control hips. CONCLUSION: Cam morphology and hip dysplasia were consistently associated with the development of hip OA. Pincer morphology was associated with hip OA in cross-sectional but not in prospective studies. The heterogeneous quantification of pincer morphology on radiographs limits a clear conclusion on its association with hip OA.
OBJECTIVE: To appraise the highest evidence on hip morphology as a risk factor for developing hip osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: We searched for studies evaluating the association between radiological hip morphology parameters and the prevalence, incidence or progression of hip OA (based on different radiographic and clinical criteria) in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PEDro databases from inception until June 2020. Prospective and cross-sectional studies were separately evaluated. Data are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 9 prospective and 21 cross-sectional studies in the meta-analysis, and evaluated 42,831 hips from 25,898 individuals (mean age: 59 years). Prospective studies showed that, compared with control hips, hips with cam morphology (alpha angle >60°; OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.83 to 3.46, P < 0.001) or hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25°; OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.84 to 3.07, P < 0.001), but not hips with pincer morphology (LCEA >39°; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.57 to 2.07, P = 0.810), were more likely to develop hip OA than hips without these morphologies. Cross-sectional studies showed a greater prevalence of pincer morphology (LCEA >39°, OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 2.98 to 4.61, P < 0.001) and acetabular retroversion (crossover sign; OR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.17 to 6.03, P = 0.020) in hips with OA than in control hips. CONCLUSION: Cam morphology and hip dysplasia were consistently associated with the development of hip OA. Pincer morphology was associated with hip OA in cross-sectional but not in prospective studies. The heterogeneous quantification of pincer morphology on radiographs limits a clear conclusion on its association with hip OA.
Authors: Joshua Heerey; Joanne Kemp; Rintje Agricola; Ramya Srinivasan; Anne Smith; Tania Pizzari; Matthew King; Peter Lawrenson; Mark Scholes; Thomas Link; Richard Souza; Sharmila Majumdar; Kay Crossley Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2021-12-15
Authors: Adrian C Ruckli; Florian Schmaranzer; Malin K Meier; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Guodong Zeng; Jürgen Burger; Klaus A Siebenrock; Nicolas Gerber; Kate Gerber Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Michael J M O'Brien; Julie S Jacobsen; Adam I Semciw; Inger Mechlenburg; Lisa U Tønning; Chris J W Stewart; Joshua Heerey; Joanne L Kemp Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2022-10-01