| Literature DB >> 34170615 |
Meghan L Avolio1, Kimberly J Komatsu2, Scott L Collins3, Emily Grman4, Sally E Koerner5, Andrew T Tredennick6, Kevin R Wilcox7, Sara Baer8, Elizabeth H Boughton9, Andrea J Britton10, Bryan Foster11, Laura Gough12, Mark Hovenden13, Forest Isbell14, Anke Jentsch15, David S Johnson16, Alan K Knapp17,18, Juergen Kreyling19, J Adam Langley20, Christopher Lortie21, Rebecca L McCulley22, Jennie R McLaren23, Peter B Reich24,25, Eric W Seabloom26, Melinda D Smith17,18, Katharine N Suding27, K Blake Suttle28, Pedro M Tognetti29.
Abstract
Global change is impacting plant community composition, but the mechanisms underlying these changes are unclear. Using a dataset of 58 global change experiments, we tested the five fundamental mechanisms of community change: changes in evenness and richness, reordering, species gains and losses. We found 71% of communities were impacted by global change treatments, and 88% of communities that were exposed to two or more global change drivers were impacted. Further, all mechanisms of change were equally likely to be affected by global change treatments-species losses and changes in richness were just as common as species gains and reordering. We also found no evidence of a progression of community changes, for example, reordering and changes in evenness did not precede species gains and losses. We demonstrate that all processes underlying plant community composition changes are equally affected by treatments and often occur simultaneously, necessitating a wholistic approach to quantifying community changes.Keywords: data synthesis; evenness; global change experiments; herbaceous plants; reordering; richness; species gains; species losses
Year: 2021 PMID: 34170615 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Lett ISSN: 1461-023X Impact factor: 9.492