Literature DB >> 34170430

Cancer in the Shadow of COVID: Early-Stage Breast and Prostate Cancer Patient Perspectives on Surgical Delays Due to COVID-19.

Claire Sokas1, Masami Kelly2, Christina Sheu2, Julia Song3, H Gilbert Welch2, Regan Bergmark2,4, Christina Minami2,5, Quoc-Dien Trinh2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective surgeries, including oncologic surgeries, were delayed. Little prospective data existed to guide practice, and professional surgical societies issued recommendations grounded mainly in common sense and expert consensus, such as medical therapy for early-stage breast and prostate cancer patients. To understand the patient experience of delay in cancer surgery during the pandemic, we interviewed breast and prostate cancer patients whose surgeries were delayed due to the pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with early-stage breast or prostate cancer who suffered surgical postponement at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) were invited to participate. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 21 breast and prostate cancer patients. Interviews were transcribed, and qualitative analysis using ground-theory approach was performed.
RESULTS: Most patients reported significant distress due to cancer and COVID. Key themes that emerged included the lack of surprise and acceptance of the surgical delays but endorsed persistent cancer- and delay-related worries. Satisfaction with patient-physician communication and the availability of a delay strategy were key factors in patients' acceptance of the situation; perceived lack of communication prompted a few patients to seek care elsewhere. DISCUSSION: The clinical effect of delay in cancer surgery will take years to fully understand, but there are immediate steps that can be taken to improve the patient experience of delays in care, including elicitation of individual patient perspectives and ongoing communication. More work is needed to understand the wider experiences of patients, especially minority, socioeconomically disadvantaged, and uninsured patients, who encounter delays in oncologic care.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34170430     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10319-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

1.  "Data were saturated . . . ".

Authors:  Janice M Morse
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-05

2.  Practical Guide to Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Margaret L Schwarze; Amy H Kaji; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  The Distress Thermometer: Cutoff Points and Clinical Use

Authors:  Alexandra Cutillo; Erin O'Hea; Sharina Person; Darleen Lessard; Tina Harralson; Edwin Boudreaux
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices.

Authors:  Alexandra Sbaraini; Stacy M Carter; R Wendell Evans; Anthony Blinkhorn
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Tracey Carr; Ulrich Teucher; Jackie Mann; Alan G Casson
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2009-10-14

6.  Assessment of Financial Toxicity Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Asad Arastu; Arpan Patel; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Joseph Ciminelli; Ramya Kaushik; Megan Wells; Eva Culakova; Lianlian Lei; Huiwen Xu; David W Dougherty; Mostafa R Mohamed; Elaine Hill; Paul Duberstein; Marie Anne Flannery; Charles Stewart Kamen; Chintan Pandya; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Valerie G Aarne Grossman; Yang Liu; Kah Poh Loh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers.

Authors:  Ylona Chun Tie; Melanie Birks; Karen Francis
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-01-02

8.  Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis for Recurrence in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wan Seop Kim; Kye Young Lee; In Ae Kim; Jae Young Hur; Hee Joung Kim; Jung Hoon Park; Jae Joon Hwang; Song Am Lee; Seung Eun Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Fear of disease progression and psychological stress in cancer patients under the outbreak of COVID-19.

Authors:  Gaili Chen; Qiuji Wu; Huangang Jiang; Hongyan Zhang; Jin Peng; Jing Hu; Min Chen; Yahua Zhong; Conghua Xie
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.955

10.  Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. the COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium.

Authors:  Jill R Dietz; Meena S Moran; Steven J Isakoff; Scott H Kurtzman; Shawna C Willey; Harold J Burstein; Richard J Bleicher; Janice A Lyons; Terry Sarantou; Paul L Baron; Randy E Stevens; Susan K Boolbol; Benjamin O Anderson; Lawrence N Shulman; William J Gradishar; Debra L Monticciolo; Donna M Plecha; Heidi Nelson; Katharine A Yao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  Delayed visit and treatment of lung cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Japan: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Takeshi Terashima; Akihiro Tsutsumi; Eri Iwami; Aoi Kuroda; Takahiro Nakajima; Keisuke Eguchi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.573

2.  Patients' Experiences with Cancer Care: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Katherine Treiman; Elissa C Kranzler; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Arena; Nicole Mack; Erica Fortune; Reese Garcia; Richard L Street
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Two wars on one front: Experiences of gynaecological cancer patients in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ruveyde Aydın; Fatmanur Sena Bostan; Kamile Kabukcuoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.328

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.