Yizhong Zheng1,2,3,4, Brendon J Yee1,2,3, Keith Wong1,2,3, Ronald Grunstein1,2, Amanda Piper1,2,3. 1. CIRUS Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Central Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Both obesity and airways disease can lead to chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, which can be managed with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. The efficacy of PAP has been studied in obesity hypoventilation syndrome as well as in chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, but not in patients where both obesity and airway obstruction coexist. This pilot study aims to compare the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure vs bilevel positive airway pressure spontaneous mode in the treatment of hypoventilation disorder with obesity and obstructive airways disease. METHODS: We sequentially screened PAP-naïve patients with stable chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 > 45 mm Hg), obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m2), and obstructive airways disease. Participants were randomized to continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure spontaneous mode treatment for 3 months. Participants were blinded to their PAP allocation. Change in awake PaCO2 was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included change in lung function, daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life, PAP adherence, and neurocognitive function. RESULTS: A total of 32 individuals were randomized (mean ± SD: age 61 ± 11 years, body mass index 43 ± 7 kg/m2, PaCO2 54 ± 7 mm Hg, forced expiratory volume in 1 second 1.4 ± 0.6L, apnea-hypopnea index 59 ± 35 events/h). Sixteen participants in each PAP group were analyzed. Bilevel positive airway pressure yielded a greater improvement in PaCO2 compared to continuous positive airway pressure (9.4 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, 4.3-15 mm Hg). There were no significant differences in PAP adherence, sleepiness, sleep quality, or neurocognitive function between the two therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Although both PAP modalities improved hypercapnic respiratory failure in this group of individuals, bilevel positive airway pressure spontaneous mode showed greater efficacy in reducing PaCO2. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Nocturnal ventilatory support in obesity hypoventilation syndrome; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12605000096651; Identifier: ACTRN12605000096651. CITATION: Zheng Y, Yee BJ, Wong K, Grunstein R, Piper A. A pilot randomized trial comparing CPAP vs bilevel PAP spontaneous mode in the treatment of hypoventilation disorder in patients with obesity and obstructive airway disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):99-107.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Both obesity and airways disease can lead to chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, which can be managed with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. The efficacy of PAP has been studied in obesity hypoventilation syndrome as well as in chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, but not in patients where both obesity and airway obstruction coexist. This pilot study aims to compare the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure vs bilevel positive airway pressure spontaneous mode in the treatment of hypoventilation disorder with obesity and obstructive airways disease. METHODS: We sequentially screened PAP-naïve patients with stable chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 > 45 mm Hg), obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m2), and obstructive airways disease. Participants were randomized to continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure spontaneous mode treatment for 3 months. Participants were blinded to their PAP allocation. Change in awake PaCO2 was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included change in lung function, daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life, PAP adherence, and neurocognitive function. RESULTS: A total of 32 individuals were randomized (mean ± SD: age 61 ± 11 years, body mass index 43 ± 7 kg/m2, PaCO2 54 ± 7 mm Hg, forced expiratory volume in 1 second 1.4 ± 0.6L, apnea-hypopnea index 59 ± 35 events/h). Sixteen participants in each PAP group were analyzed. Bilevel positive airway pressure yielded a greater improvement in PaCO2 compared to continuous positive airway pressure (9.4 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, 4.3-15 mm Hg). There were no significant differences in PAP adherence, sleepiness, sleep quality, or neurocognitive function between the two therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Although both PAP modalities improved hypercapnic respiratory failure in this group of individuals, bilevel positive airway pressure spontaneous mode showed greater efficacy in reducing PaCO2. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Nocturnal ventilatory support in obesity hypoventilation syndrome; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12605000096651; Identifier: ACTRN12605000096651. CITATION: Zheng Y, Yee BJ, Wong K, Grunstein R, Piper A. A pilot randomized trial comparing CPAP vs bilevel PAP spontaneous mode in the treatment of hypoventilation disorder in patients with obesity and obstructive airway disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):99-107.
Authors: Xavier Soler; Eduardo Gaio; Frank L Powell; Joe W Ramsdell; Jose S Loredo; Atul Malhotra; Andrew L Ries Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-08
Authors: Juan F Masa; Babak Mokhlesi; Iván Benítez; Francisco Javier Gomez de Terreros; Maria Ángeles Sánchez-Quiroga; Auxiliadora Romero; Candela Caballero-Eraso; Joaquin Terán-Santos; Maria Luz Alonso-Álvarez; Maria F Troncoso; Mónica González; Soledad López-Martín; José M Marin; Sergi Martí; Trinidad Díaz-Cambriles; Eusebi Chiner; Carlos Egea; Javier Barca; Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo; Miguel A Negrín; María Martel-Escobar; Ferran Barbe; Jaime Corral Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jose M Marin; Joan B Soriano; Santiago J Carrizo; Ana Boldova; Bartolome R Celli Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Olalla Castro-Añón; Luis A Pérez de Llano; Sandra De la Fuente Sánchez; Rafael Golpe; Lidia Méndez Marote; Julián Castro-Castro; Arturo González Quintela Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Irene Torres-Sánchez; Elisabeth Rodríguez-Alzueta; Irene Cabrera-Martos; Isabel López-Torres; Maria Paz Moreno-Ramírez; Marie Carmen Valenza Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Juan F Masa; Jaime Corral; Candela Caballero; Emilia Barrot; Joaquin Terán-Santos; Maria L Alonso-Álvarez; Teresa Gomez-Garcia; Mónica González; Soledad López-Martín; Pilar De Lucas; José M Marin; Sergi Marti; Trinidad Díaz-Cambriles; Eusebi Chiner; Carlos Egea; Erika Miranda; Babak Mokhlesi; Estefanía García-Ledesma; M-Ángeles Sánchez-Quiroga; Estrella Ordax; Nicolás González-Mangado; Maria F Troncoso; Maria-Ángeles Martinez-Martinez; Olga Cantalejo; Elena Ojeda; Santiago J Carrizo; Begoña Gallego; Mercedes Pallero; M Antonia Ramón; Josefa Díaz-de-Atauri; Jesús Muñoz-Méndez; Cristina Senent; Jose N Sancho-Chust; Francisco J Ribas-Solís; Auxiliadora Romero; José M Benítez; Jesús Sanchez-Gómez; Rafael Golpe; Ana Santiago-Recuerda; Silvia Gomez; Mónica Bengoa Journal: Thorax Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Madalina Macrea; Simon Oczkowski; Bram Rochwerg; Richard D Branson; Bartolome Celli; John M Coleman; Dean R Hess; Shandra Lee Knight; Jill A Ohar; Jeremy E Orr; Amanda J Piper; Naresh M Punjabi; Shilpa Rahangdale; Peter J Wijkstra; Susie Yim-Yeh; M Bradley Drummond; Robert L Owens Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405