Literature DB >> 34169808

The minimal clinically important difference in Berg Balance Scale scores among patients with early subacute stroke: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

Shuntaro Tamura1, Kazuhiro Miyata2, Sota Kobayashi3,4, Ren Takeda4,5, Hiroaki Iwamoto6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balance dysfunction is common in stroke patients. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is useful for evaluating the balance function of stroke patients, and it can estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in balance. BBS scores differ among stroke patients depending on whether they require walking assistance. The MCID should thus be estimated separately for patients who require assistance and those who do not.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the MCID of individuals who have had an early subacute stroke and require a walking aid and those who do not, to assist the clinical determination of the effectiveness of therapy.
METHODS: This was a retrospective clinical analysis of 80 early subacute stroke patients. We estimated the MCID by using the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) as anchors for changes in BBS scores during a 1-month period. The MCID was estimated based on a cutoff score for separating the patients who achieved a FAC change ≥1 point on receiver operator characteristic curves. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to measure the discrimination accuracy. The MCID was estimated for the patients who needed walking assistance and those who did not.
RESULTS: The estimated MCID of BBS scores in the assisted-walking group was 5 points and the AUC was 0.84 (p < .01); the corresponding values in the unassisted-walking group were 4 points and 0.62 (p = .26).
CONCLUSIONS: For early subacute stroke patients who require assistance to walk, a 5-point improvement in the BBS score is a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal clinically important difference; balance; berg balance scale; early subacute stroke; outcome measure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34169808     DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1943800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.177


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Functional Mobility and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Authors:  Eiji Kobayashi; Kenta Hiratsuka; Hirokazu Haruna; Nobue Kojima; Nobuaki Himuro
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Efficacy of Overground Robotic Gait Training on Balance in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Lorusso; Marco Tramontano; Matteo Casciello; Andrea Pece; Nicola Smania; Giovanni Morone; Federica Tamburella
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Robot Assisted Gait Training in a Patient with Ataxia.

Authors:  Gianfranco Lamberti; Gianluca Sesenna; Martina Marina; Emanuela Ricci; Gianluca Ciardi
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-22

4.  Targeting CNS Neural Mechanisms of Gait in Stroke Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica P McCabe; Svetlana Pundik; Janis J Daly
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-09

5.  Effects of Home-Based Nine-Square Step Exercises for Fall Prevention in Thai Community-Dwelling Older Adults during a COVID-19 Lockdown: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Disatorn Dejvajara; Ranlaphat Aungkasuraphan; Piyathida Palee; Chanodom Piankusol; Wachiranun Sirikul; Penprapa Siviroj
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.