| Literature DB >> 34169679 |
Giovanni Corona1, Giulia Rastrelli2, Sara Marchiani2, Sandra Filippi2, Annamaria Morelli3, Erica Sarchielli3, Alessandra Sforza4, Linda Vignozzi2, Mario Maggi5.
Abstract
The real epidemiology and the possible consequences of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) use still represent a very tricky task due to the difficulties in the quantification and detection of these drugs. Chronic use of AAS, frequently combined with other illicit substances, can induce tremendous negative effects on the reproductive system, but it is also associated with an increased overall and cardiovascular mortality risk. In the present review we summarize and discuss the available evidence regarding the negative impact of AAS on the male reproductive system, providing practical suggestions to manage these problems. For this purpose a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of AAS abusers vs. controls on several hormonal, reproductive and metabolic parameters was performed. In addition, in order to overcome possible limitations related to the combined use of different AAS preparations, we also retrospectively re-analyzed data on animal models treated with supraphysiological dosage of testosterone (T), performed in our laboratory. Available data clearly indicated that AAS negatively affect endogenous T production. In addition, increased T and estradiol circulating levels were also observed according to the type of preparations used. The latter leads to an impairment of sperm production and to the development of side effects such as acne, hair loss and gynecomastia. Furthermore, a worse metabolic profile, characterized by reduced high density lipoprotein and increased low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels along with an increased risk of hypertension has been also detected. Finally sexual dysfunctions, often observed upon doping, represent one the most probable unfavorable effects of AAS abuse.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular risk; Doping in sports; Hypogonadism; Infertility, gynecomastia; Sperm; Testosterone congeners
Year: 2021 PMID: 34169679 PMCID: PMC8987149 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.210021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Mens Health ISSN: 2287-4208 Impact factor: 5.400
Biological proprieties of the commonly used anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS)
| AAS | Substrate for aromatization | Substrate for 5-alpha reductase |
|---|---|---|
| Testosterone | + | + |
| Boldenone | + | + |
| Metadione | + | + |
| Nortestosterone | + | + |
| Metandienone | + | + |
| Fluoxymesterone | + | - |
| Formebolone | + | - |
| Nadrolone | + | - |
| Bolandiola | + | - |
| Oxymetholone | + | Already 5-alpha reduced |
| Stanazol | - | + |
| Oxandrolone | - | + |
| Trenbolone | - | + |
| Danazol | - | + |
| Dostranolone | - | + |
| Metenolone | - | Already 5-alpha reduced |
| Clostebol | - | - |
| Gestrinone | - | - |
| Tetrahydrogestrinone | - | - |
aNadrolone precursors.
Characteristics of trials included in the meta-analysis
| Authors | AAS | Controls | Study area | Population type | Type of controls | Type of AAS | Follow-up | Mean age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aakvaag and Stromme, 1974 [ | 10 | 11 | Norway | Normal subjects | Normal subjects | Mesterolone | 8 | |
| Strauss et al, 1983 [ | 20 | 7 | USA | Bodybuilders | Bodybuilders | Mixed | 27.7 | |
| Alén et al, 1985 [ | 5 | 6 | Finland | Not specified athletes | Not specified athletes | Mixed | 26 | 26.3 |
| Yesalis et al, 1988 [ | 15 | - | USA | Weightlifters | - | Mixed | - | 27 |
| Knuth et al, 1989 [ | 19 | 10 | Germany | Bodybuilders | Bodybuilders | Mixed | - | 26.7 |
| Moss et al, 1993 [ | 15 | - | USA | Amateur body building athletes | - | Mixed | - | 25.2 |
| Evans, 1997 [ | 100 | - | UK | Bodybuilders | - | Mixed | - | From 16 up to >40 |
| Korkia and Stimson, 1997 [ | 97 | - | UK | Amateur athletes | - | Mixed | - | 27.3 |
| Torres-Calleja et al, 2001 [ | 15 | 15 | Mexico | Bodybuilders | Bodybuilders | Mixed | 8.7 | 26.3 |
| Fudala et al, 2003 [ | 88 | - | USA | Not specified athletes | - | Mixed | - | 18–59 |
| Perry et al, 2005 [ | 207 | - | USA | Bodybuilder and other athletes | - | Mixed | - | 27.2 |
| Taher et al, 2008 [ | 15 | 15 | Iran | Bodybuilders | Healthy sedentary | Mixed | - | - |
| Ip et al, 2010 [ | 506 | - | USA | Mixed population: recreational exercisers, competitive bodybuilders, competitive weightlifters, competitive athletes | Mixed population: recreational exercisers, competitive bodybuilders, competitive weightlifters, competitive athletes | Mixed | 260 | 29.3 |
| Al-Janabi et al, 2011 [ | 15 | 15 | Iraq | Bodybuilders | Bodybuilders | Mixed | - | 15–28 |
| Coward et al, 2013 [ | 80 | - | USA | Bodybuilders | Bodybuilders | Mixed | - | 40.4 |
| Razavi et al, 2014 [ | 72 | - | Iran | Not specified abusers | - | Mixed | From <6 months up to >12 years | 25.5 |
| Rasmussen et al, 2016 [ | 37 | 30 | Denmark | Not specified abusers | Healthy volunteers | Mixed | 142.3 | 31.4 |
| Baggish et al, 2017 [ | 86 | 54 | USA | Weightlifters | Weightlifters | Mixed | 384 | 42 |
| Bordin et al, 2017 [ | 20 | 20 | Brazil | Soccer and body builder professional athletes | Non abuser professional athletes | Mixed | 21–27 | |
| Barbosa Neto et al, 2018 [ | 15 | 15 | Brazil | Bodybuilders | Healthy volunteers | Mixed | 197.6 | |
| Horwitz et al, 2019 [ | 545 | - | Denmark | Tested positive for AAS in Danish | - | Mixed | - | 26.2 |
| Smit and de Ronde, 2018 [ | 180 | - | Netherlands | Not specified abusers | - | Mixed | - | 34 |
| Souza et al, 2019 [ | 20 | 10 | Brazil | Not specified abusers | Healthy sedentary subjects | Mixed | 104 | 29 |
| Börjesson et al, 2020 [ | 16 | 5 | Sweden | Mixed athletes | Past AAS users | Mixed | 208 | 33 |
UK: United Kingdom, USA: United States of America, AAS: anabolic androgenic steroids.
aRandomized controlled trial.
Overall weighted differences (with 95% CI) in hormonal, sperm, body composition and metabolic parameters as derived from meta-analysis in men using or not using anabolic androgenic steroids
| Parameter | Study no. | Mean (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hormonal parameters | ||||
| Lutenizing hormone (mU/mL) | 8 | -2.60 (-3.18 to -2.01) | <0.0001 | |
| Follicular stimulating hormone (mU/mL) | 8 | -2.61 (-3.32 to -1.91) | <0.0001 | |
| Total testosterone (nmol/L) | 9 | 8.75 (0.79 to 16.72) | <0.03 | |
| Total estradiol (pmol/L) | 5 | 170.23 (81.10 to 259.36) | <0.0001 | |
| Sex hormone binding globulin (nmol/L) | 2 | -17.06 (-33.58 to -0.54) | 0.04 | |
| Sperm parameters | ||||
| Sperm count (×106) | 2 | -47.28 (-79.93 to -14.62) | <0.0001 | |
| Sperm concentration (×106/mL) | 3 | -39.59 (-82.82 to 3.63) | 0.07 | |
| Normal morphology | 3 | -2.00 (-2.95 to -1.04)a | <0.0001 | |
| Body composition and metabolic parameters | ||||
| Lean mass | 5 | 1.24 (0.62 to 1.87)a | <0.0001 | |
| Fat mass | 4 | -1.07 (-1.53 to -0.61)a | <0.0001 | |
| Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4 | 0.63 (0.38 to 0.88) | <0.0001 | |
| High density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5 | -0.43 (-0.56 to -0.31) | <0.0001 | |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4 | 0.13 (-0.24 to 0.51) | 0.48 | |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 3 | 0.16 (-0.23 to 0.55) | 0.43 | |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 2 | 0.11 (-0.36 to 0.59) | 0.63 | |
CI: confidence interval.
aStandardized mean (95% CI).
Fig. 1Rate (95% confidence interval) of the main adverse events related to the abuse of anabolic androgen steroids. LL: lower levels, UP: upper levels.
Fig. 2Circulating testosterone (T; A) and luteinizing hormone (LH; B) levels in eugonadal rabbits fed a regular diet (RD), which performed (RD+PhyEx) or not physical exercise (PhyEx). The effect of supraphysiological dosing with T is also showed in rabbits which performed physical exercise (RD+T+PhyEx) or not (RD+T). Weight of testis (C) and seminal vesicles (D) in the four aforementioned rabbit arms. Level of significance upon Kruskal–Wallis and post-hoc Mann–Whitney analyses is also indicated, along with number of observations. *Outlier.
Fig. 3Effect of physical exercise (PhyEx) and testosterone (T) on skeletal muscle fiber composition. (A) Representative images of periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining of vastus medialis cross-sections from untreated rabbits (RD) and rabbits fed a regular diet (RD) and treated with testosterone (RD+T) and/or physical exercise (RD+PhyEx, RD+T+PhyEx). Scale bar 50 µm. Based on PAS staining intensity, indicative of glycogen content, fibers are classified as light-, medium- or dark-stained, ranging from oxidative to glycolytic. T and PhyEx treatments do not affect the overall fiber composition, maintaining the ratio between oxidative (light) and glycolytic (medium/dark) fibers, as quantified by counting ten fields from muscle sections of at least three animals for each experimental group (B). (C) An increased fiber diameter was detected in PAS-stained muscle cross-sections from PhyEx and T-treated groups, as analyzed using Image J 1.51f software (National Institutes of Health). ap<0.001 vs. RD; bp<0.001 vs. RD+PhyEx.
Fig. 4Relaxant (A) and contractile (B) response to acetylcholine (3 µM) or phenylephrine (100 µM), respectively, on isolated rabbit corpora cavernosa strips from eugonadal rabbit fed a regular diet (RD) and treated with (RD+T) or not with supraphysiological concentration of testosterone (T). Results in rabbit treated as before but performing physical exercise (PhyEx) are also showed (RD+PhyEx and RD+T+PhyEx). Level of significance upon Kruskal–Wallis and post-hoc Mann–Whitney analyses is also indicated, along with number of observations. Panel (C) shows frequency-dependent erectile response of eugonadal rat treated or not with a supraphysiological dose of T. Erection was elicited by electrical stimulation (2.5 V, 5 msec, 30 s) of the cavernous nerve at varying stimulation frequency (1–32 Hz). Erectile function was quantified by intracavernous pressure/mean arterial pressure (ICP/MAP)×100 in the indicated numer of rats. *Outlier.
Fig. 5Sperm parameters in eugonadal rabbit fed a regular (RD) treated (RD+T) or not with supraphysiological dosing of testosterone (T). T significantly decreased sperm number (A) and % normal morphology (B), while it did affect sperm motility (C, D). Level of significance at Mann–Whitney analysis is indicated, along with number of observations.