G Damiani1,2,3, A Pacifico4, F Pelloni5, M Iorizzo5,6. 1. Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 2. Clinical Dermatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. 3. PhD Degree Program in Pharmacological Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. 4. Clinical Dermatology Department, IRCCS S. Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Rome, Italy. 5. Private Dermatology Practice, Lugano, Switzerland. 6. Private Dermatology Practice, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Giovanni Damiani: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. Alessia Pacifico: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation. Writing – review and editing. Francesco Pelloni: Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Writing – review and editing. Matilde Iorizzo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.Dear
Editor,During the COVID‐19 pandemics, the management of immunosuppressed patients, those affected by autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs), became a matter of particular concern for healthcare systems; dissemination of sound and updated information became mandatory to orient physicians and more generally healthcare policy., Furthermore, AIBDs patients were encouraged to take advantage from teledermatological rather than in‐person consultations; also, they were encouraged to undergo COVID‐19 vaccination, preferably during remission periods or at least while under low immunosuppression., To date, data regarding the effect of COVID vaccines on AIBDs are scanty. We present 5 cases (from 4 different centres) of bullous pemphigoid (BP) – respectively of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) – all confirmed by clinical, immunopathologic/serological findings, where the patients had undergone COVID vaccination during a period of remission of their bullous disease and have subsequently experienced a disease flare (Table 1).
Table 1
Data of AIBD‐affected patients
Sex/age
AIBD
Previous medications for AIBDs
Vaccine (2 doses)
New medications for flare up
Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 S1‐RBD IgG >50 UI/L
1
F/75
BP
Oral prednisone
Moderna
Oral prednisone
Yes
2
M/40
PV
Rituximab
Moderna
Oral prednisone
Mycophenolate mofetil
Yes
3
M/84
BP
Oral prednisone
Azathioprine
Moderna
Oral prednisone*
Yes
4
F/82
BP
Oral prednisone
Mycophenolate mofetil
Pfizer
Oral prednisone
Yes
5
M/80
PV
Oral prednisone
Mycophenolate mofetil
Pfizer
Oral prednisone
Yes
Treatment started only after the 2nd dose.
Data of AIBD‐affected patientsOral prednisoneMycophenolate mofetilOral prednisoneAzathioprineOral prednisoneMycophenolate mofetilOral prednisoneMycophenolate mofetilTreatment started only after the 2nd dose.Case 1. A 63‐year‐old female with bullous pemphigoid (BP) in clinical remission since 6 months after oral prednisone treatment was administered the first dose of Moderna mRNA‐1273 vaccine, and 3 days later, she experienced a flare of her disease: the latter started with a generalized erythema 1 day after the vaccination, and on the third day, several blisters appeared on the trunk. The diagnosis was made in a telemedical consultation and oral prednisone was prescribed. 28 days later, the patient was given the second dose of the vaccine, and no disease flares and no injection site reactions took place.Case 2. A 40‐year‐old male, with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in remission since one year after rituximab therapy, came to our attention 3 days after the first dose of the Moderna mRNA‐1273 vaccine because of a PV flare. He presented with several blisters on the back and on the upper limbs (Fig. 1) and started a therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and oral prednisone. After 28 days, he was given the second dose of the vaccine: he experienced only pain on the injection site for 2 days.
Fig. 1
Patient number 2 showing a flare of PV after the 1st dose of Moderna mRNA‐1273 vaccine
Patient number 2 showing a flare of PV after the 1st dose of Moderna mRNA‐1273 vaccineCase 3. A 84‐year‐old male with BP in remission since 4 years after oral prednisone and azathioprine treatment was administered the first dose of the Moderna mRNA‐1273 vaccine. After 2 weeks, he started showing mild blistering lesions on the trunk, which were deemed not to require systemic immunosuppressive treatment. 28 days later, the patient was given the second dose; a worsening of the lesions which became more widespread, involving also the oral cavity, took place. A treatment with oral prednisone was started.Case 4. A 82‐year‐old female with BP in remission since 3 years after oral prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil treatment was given the first dose of the Pfizer mRNABNT162b2 vaccine. 3 days later, the patient experienced a moderate BP flare in the form of small blisters on the arms and legs. The patient lived in a nursing home where only teledermatological consultations were possible. Oral prednisone was prescribed, and the second dose was administered 21 days later. No further BP flares and no injection site reactions occurred.Case 5. A 80‐year‐old male with a history of PV remitted before 1 year after oral prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil treatment experienced a flare 3 days after the first dose of the mRNABNT162b2 vaccine. He was seen in a teledermatological consultation because of severe blisters on the back, and he was treated with oral prednisone. After 21 days, the patient was able to complete the second dose of Pfizer mRNABNT162b2 vaccination. No further BP flares and no injection site reactions occurred.Despite the ongoing treatment with immunosuppressants, all patients developed IgG antibodies against the SARS‐CoV‐2 S1‐receptor binding domain (RBD) (>150 UI) 1 month after the second dose, which supports the assumption that the vaccination was effective in all cases presented.These anecdotal data suggest that both mRNA vaccines may trigger relapses in AIBD patients. Vaccines are important in AIBDs patients, since the latter are characterized by a vulnerability against infections in the mucocutaneous barrier: completion of vaccination is advisable, and patients should be treated for flares when needed. However, data on the effect on immunosuppressants on IgG antibodies titres in short and long term are needed. IgG S1‐RBD persistence in AIBD patients is also a matter of concern; this should encourage dermatologists to monitor anti‐COVID‐19 immunity.
Authors: M Kasperkiewicz; E Schmidt; M Amagai; J A Fairley; P Joly; D F Murrell; A S Payne; M L Yale; D Zillikens; D T Woodley Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: M Kasperkiewicz; E Schmidt; J A Fairley; P Joly; A S Payne; M L Yale; D Zillikens; D T Woodley Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 9.228
Authors: T Gambichler; S Boms; L Susok; H Dickel; C Finis; N Abu Rached; M Barras; M Stücker; D Kasakovski Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 9.228
Authors: Carlo Alberto Maronese; Marzia Caproni; Chiara Moltrasio; Giovanni Genovese; Pamela Vezzoli; Paolo Sena; Giulia Previtali; Emanuele Cozzani; Giulia Gasparini; Aurora Parodi; Laura Atzori; Emiliano Antiga; Roberto Maglie; Francesco Moro; Elena Biancamaria Mariotti; Alberto Corrà; Sabatino Pallotta; Biagio Didona; Angelo Valerio Marzano; Giovanni Di Zenzo Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-02-28