| Literature DB >> 34169082 |
Ya Shi1,2, Luyao Ye1,2, Qiuying Chen1,2, Guangyi Hu1,2, Yao Yin2, Ying Fan1, Jianfeng Zhu2, Jiangnan He2, Zhi Zheng1, Haidong Zou1,2, Xun Xu1,2.
Abstract
Background: To characterize the longitudinal changes of macular vessel density in young adults and its associated factors.Entities:
Keywords: high myopia; longitudinal study; macular vessel density; optical coherence tomography angiography; retinal thickness
Year: 2021 PMID: 34169082 PMCID: PMC8217628 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.648644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Optical coherence tomography angiographic (OCTA) images from a 18-year-old student with myopia who was followed-up from October 2016 to July 2018. The macular vessel density (VD) decreased between baseline (A) and the end of follow-up (B) in each sector. The boundaries used for segmentation were indicated between two red lines on the cross-sectional OCTA reflectance (C,D). The sectors were automatically measured according to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid.
Demographic and ocular characteristics of study participants.
| Age, years | 19.73 ± 2.18 | 19.34 ± 2.27 | 19.25 ± 2.16 | 0.2336 | / |
| Female, | 27 (67.50) | 100 (51.55) | 27 (36.00) | 0.0042 | EM > HM |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 20.73 ± 3.08 | 21.02 ± 2.73 | 20.77 ± 3.43 | 0.2375 | / |
| SBP, mmHg | 120.73 ± 17.55 | 120.68 ± 15.53 | 124.55 ± 16.24 | 0.2212 | / |
| DBP, mmHg | 73.70 ± 10.92 | 71.28 ± 10.11 | 73.85 ± 9.68 | 0.0886 | / |
| HR, bpm | 74.77 ± 10.27 | 74.35 ± 11.23 | 75.56 ± 9.85 | 0.6828 | / |
| SE, D | −1.49 ± 1.69 | −3.70 ± 1.95 | −5.97 ± 2.38 | <0.0001 | EM > MIM/MOM > HM |
| BCVA, logMAR | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.03 ± 0.05 | 0.0004 | EM < MIM/MOM, HM |
| IOP, mmHg | 14.05 ± 3.10 | 13.98 ± 2.69 | 14.00 ± 2.80 | 0.9683 | / |
| MOPP, mmHg | 45.77 ± 8.54 | 44.54 ± 7.61 | 44.89 ± 12.06 | 0.2886 | / |
| ACD, mm | 3.60 ± 0.21 | 3.74 ± 0.22 | 3.77 ± 0.27 | 0.0004 | EM < MIM/MOM, HM |
| CCT, μm | 543.06 ± 35.72 | 539.82 ± 35.04 | 535.84 ± 37.34 | 0.5862 | / |
| LT, mm | 3.53 ± 0.22 | 3.49 ± 0.36 | 3.49 ± 0.22 | 0.5699 | / |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated.
Comparison among the three groups were using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for categorical data or the one-way ANOVA test for continuous data with post-hoc test (Bonferroni).
ACD, anterior chamber depth; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; BMI, body mass index; CCT, central corneal thickness; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; EM, emmetropia; HM, high myopia; HR, heart rate; IOP, intraocular pressure; logMAR, logarithm of minimal angle resolution; LT, lens thickness; MIM, mild myopia; MOM, moderate myopia; MOPP, mean ocular perfusion pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SE, spherical equivalent.
Comparison of globally VD and ocular parameters between baseline and the end of follow-up period.
| VD, mm | |||||
| Baseline | 19.00 ± 0.71 | 18.82 ± 1.52 | 18.95 ± 1.36 | 0.5843 | / |
| Follow-up | 18.39 ± 1.01 | 17.99 ± 4.87 | 17.01 ± 2.60 | 0.1392 | / |
| Changes | −0.61 ± 0.97 | −0.81 ± 5.08 | −1.96 ± 2.57 | 0.0307 | EM < HM |
| | 0.0003 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| AL, mm | |||||
| Baseline | 23.53 ± 0.40 | 25.06 ± 0.54 | 26.59 ± 0.59 | <0.0001 | EM < MIM/MOM < HM |
| Follow-up | 23.56 ± 0.41 | 25.15 ± 0.58 | 26.67 ± 0.62 | <0.0001 | EM < MIM/MOM < HM |
| Changes | 0.04 ± 0.10 | 0.08 ± 0.18 | 0.08 ± 0.13 | 0.0384 | EM < MIM/MOM, HM |
| | 0.0253 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| RT, μm | |||||
| Baseline | 280.08 ± 12.96 | 277.33 ± 11.05 | 273.99 ± 13.13 | 0.0530 | / |
| Follow-up | 278.29 ± 11.46 | 275.80 ± 10.74 | 267.13 ± 35.02 | 0.0052 | EM, MIM/MOM > HM |
| Changes | −0.79 ± 2.97 | −1.86 ± 3.32 | −6.94 ± 32.17 | 0.1585 | / |
| | 0.1783 | <0.0001 | 0.0006 | ||
| GCC, μm | |||||
| Baseline | 108.92 ± 4.88 | 109.86 ± 6.04 | 109.19 ± 5.89 | 0.6318 | / |
| Follow-up | 108.88 ± 5.00 | 109.32 ± 6.54 | 105.25 ± 16.48 | 0.3053 | / |
| Changes | −0.14 ± 2.19 | −0.46 ± 2.99 | −3.66 ± 15.34 | 0.2452 | / |
| | 0.7382 | <0.0001 | 0.0031 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Comparisons between the baseline and the follow-ups using the paired t-test. Comparison among the three groups were using the one-way ANOVA test with post-hoc test (Bonferroni).
EM, emmetropia; GCC, ganglion cell complex; MIM, mild myopia, MOM, moderate myopia; HM, high myopia; RT, retinal thickness; VD, macular vessel density.
Figure 2The violin plot in distribution of (A) vessel density (VD), (B) axial length (AL), (C) retinal thickness (RT) and (D) ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in different groups at baseline and the end of follow-up. EM1, emmetropia at baseline; EM2, emmetropia at the end of follow-up; HM1, high myopia at baseline; HM2, high myopia at the end of follow-up; MIM/MOM1, mild-to-moderate myopia at baseline; MIM/MOM2, mild-to-moderate myopia at the end of follow-up.
Figure 3Topographic variation of the change rate of macular vessel density in all sectors for (A) EM, (B) MIM/MOM, (C) HM. EM, emmetropia; HM, high myopia; MIM/MOM, mild-to-moderate myopia.
Multivariate regression analysis of association with changes of sectoral VD in all participants.
| II | |||
| BCVA, logMAR | 3.37 | −2.31 to 9.05 | 0.2430 |
| Baseline AL, mm | −0.57 | −1.05 to −0.08 | 0.0224 |
| Changes of AL, mm | −2.59 | −5.67 to 0.50 | 0.0995 |
| Baseline RT, μm | 0.02 | −0.03 to 0.06 | 0.4354 |
| Changes of RT, μm | 0.02 | −0.03 to 0.08 | 0.3874 |
| Changes of GCC, μm | 0.02 | −0.10 to 0.14 | 0.7346 |
| IT | |||
| BVCA, logMAR | 1.45 | −4.62 to 7.51 | 0.6379 |
| Baseline AL, mm | −0.73 | −1.25 to −0.21 | 0.0057 |
| Changes of AL, mm | −2.46 | −5.76 to 0.85 | 0.1445 |
| Changes of GCC, μm | 0.05 | −0.01 to 0.11 | 0.1281 |
| OT | |||
| ACD, mm | −1.31 | −2.92 to 0.30 | 0.1095 |
| Baseline AL, mm | −0.44 | −0.82 to −0.05 | 0.0266 |
| Changes of AL, mm | −2.10 | −4.62 to 0.42 | 0.1022 |
ACD, anterior chamber depth; AL, axial length; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; GCC, ganglion cell complex; II, inner inferior; IT, inner temporal; logMAR, logarithm of minimal angle resolution; OT, outer temporal; RT, retinal thickness; VD, vessel density.
Figure 4Simple linear regression analysis between baseline AL with the changes of vessel density (VD) in the (A) inner inferior (II), (B) inner temporal (IT) and outer temporal (OT) sectors.