Literature DB >> 34168460

Psychological Effects of Lockdown Measures for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Luca Quartuccio1,2, Ginevra De Marchi1, Danila Azzolina3, Elisabetta Maresio4, Donatella Colatutto1,2, Marco Binutti1,2, Marinella Monte5, Silvia Gallipoli6, Federica Zobec6, Corrado Lanera3, Giulia Lorenzoni3, Alvisa Palese2,7, Marco Silano8, Salvatore De Vita1,2, Dario Gregori3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychological impact of the lockdown measures contrasting the COVID-19 outbreak between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and general population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 15th to August 15th 2020, a retrospective survey referring to the period March 9th to May 18th 2020 was administered to SLE patients and the results of the survey, called LEPRE (Lupus Erythematosus PREsto) study, were compared with those from the PRESTO (imPact of quaRantine mEasures againST cOvid19) project, the same survey provided to the general population. Consecutive patients >18 years old affected by SLE and regularly followed in a single rheumatologic centre were involved. Primary outcome was to compare the scores of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12) and the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D) between patients and general population.
RESULTS: A total of 64 patients completed the survey. After a propensity score matching, they were compared to 128 people from PRESTO project. The median age among patients was 43 years (I-III interquartile range 35-54.5), 88% were female and 100% Caucasian. IES-R [(score>23: 57% (34) vs 49% (58)], GHQ-12 [(score>13: 85% (52) vs 88% (106)], and CES-D [(score>15: 45% (28) vs 40% (46)] scores were not statistically different between patients and controls (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Restrictive measures for COVID-19 pandemic had no greater impact on patients with SLE than in the general population. Strategy for coping to the SLE might be useful during lockdown measures and may be helpful for other chronic conditions.
© 2021 Quartuccio et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; psychological distress; systemic lupus erythematosus

Year:  2021        PMID: 34168460      PMCID: PMC8216740          DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S311325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc        ISSN: 1178-2390


Introduction

COVID-19 is a systemic viral disease currently spreading as a pandemic.1 A more severe course and prognosis of COVID-19 in some autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and vasculitis, and for some immunosuppressive agents or higher doses of glucocorticoids has been reported.2 SLE is the model of systemic autoimmune disease, that is characterizes by the occurrence in young people, chronic course, increased susceptibility to infections, damage accrual due to the disease itself and long-term glucocorticoid therapy and immunosuppressive treatments, and comorbidities. Furthermore, SLE is a chronic disease that deeply affects multiple dimensions of young patients’ lives, with fatigue and chronic pain being the most frequent symptoms, with a profound effect on quality of life, despite treatments.3,4 On the other hand, chronic diseases affecting the humoral immune system show a great impact on mental health. In fact, a stronger association with psychiatric disorders and suicidal behavior has been recently highlighted for joint exposure to primary humoral immunodeficiencies and autoimmune disease.5 Thus, a pandemic is a trigger that can influence the mental health of patients living with SLE. The PRESTO (imPact of quaRantine mEasures againST cOvid19) project is a survey that investigated the impact of the Italian government measures adopted between March 9th and May 18th 2020. This project was sponsored by SANV Unite (Feeding, Nutrition and Health) of the Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanità, the Unit of biostatistics, epidemiology and public health of Department of cardio-thoracic-vascular Science and public health (DCTV) of Padua University and by Psychotherapy and Psychology Unit of Prochild Onlus, with technical support by Zeta Research S.r.l. The project was based on a broad review of studies which reported negative psychological effects of quarantine, including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma.6 Our investigation, namely the Lupus Erythematosus PRESTO (LEPRE) study, aimed to evaluate the psychological impact of lockdown measures against COVID-19 on patients with SLE as compared to the general population participating in the PRESTO project.

Patients and Methods

From July 15th to August 15th 2020, consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old affected by SLE classified according to the 2019 ACR criteria7 and regularly followed at our Rheumatology Clinic, Academic Hospital of Udine, were asked to anonymously complete the online questionnaire referring to the quarantine period March 9th to May 18th 2020. All patients who were involved had been taking stable treatment for at least 6 months and they were in remission or in low disease activity state.8 Patients with pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders were excluded. During the lockdown measures, the patients had full access to the hospital for urgent visits, and could communicate with medical staff via telephone or email. The survey collected socio-demographic data and focused on COVID-19 concerns, emotional impact, self-perception, and change in habits during quarantine for the COVID-19 outbreak. The psychological impact was measured using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R),9 the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12),10 and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).11 In detail, the IES-R was designed as a measure of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and is a short, easily administered self-report questionnaire. It is best used for recent and specific traumatic events. It has 22 questions, 5 of which were added to the original Horowitz (IES) to better capture the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD. The IES-R score was categorized into 4 classes according to a recent publication in the field: 0–23 (normal), 24–32 (mild psychological impact), 33–36 (moderate psychological impact), and ≥37 (severe impact).12 To assess psychological distress, the GHQ-12 was employed, using a cut-off at 14 points to identify psychological distress.13 Finally, depression was screened using the CES-D. Three classes of symptoms severity were considered: 0–15 (no/mild depressive symptoms), 16–23 (moderate depressive symptoms), and 24–60 (severe depressive symptoms).11 Results from the LEPRE project were compared with those reported by the general population (PRESTO project), with further sub analyses by including or not people declaring chronic diseases. The PRESTO project is a survey started on the 20th of March 2020 with the aim of describing lifestyle habits and the prevalence of psychological discomfort among the Italian population during the COVID-19 lockdown. It was web-based, using Lime Survey, and it was disseminated via messaging apps (eg, WhatsApp) and social networks (eg, Facebook). Stakeholders other than physicians were involved in the study: health professionals (AP), psychologists (EM), nutritionists (MS), epidemiologists and biostatisticians (DG, DA, CL, GL), and patients (MM) were involved in planning the study and interpretation of the results. Data were summarized according to LEPRE versus PRESTO groups (for the best comparison only people coming from Friuli Venezia Giulia region of Italy were selected) and reported as a percentage and absolute number. The Pearson Chi-Square test was performed to compare the groups together with the Fisher exact test wherever appropriate. A propensity score was estimated to match the LEPRE cases to the PRESTO responders with a ratio of 2 versus 1.14 To perform clustering analysis on categorical data, the Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) results can be used to transform categorical variables into a set of few continuous variables (the latent dimension). The cluster analysis can then be applied to the results. In this case, the MCA can be considered as pre-processing steps that allow computing clustering on categorical data. A Factorial Agglomerative hierarchical clustering analysis has been then carried out on the MCA results. The distance between MCA loadings has been computed via Manhattan measure using the Ward method to identify the hierarchical partition. The data partition has been represented in a cluster dendrogram. The cluster membership together with the individual loading has been represented in a factor map with the 95% confidence ellipses around centroids. The features discriminating the clusters according to the Chi-square significance (alpha<0.05) have been selected and summarized ( and ). A significance level of 0.05 has been considered for the analyses. Computations have been performed with the R 3.6.2 system and the Factominer, Matchit, and Factoextra packages.

Results

Among 110 patients who were asked to participate in the study, 64 patients anonymously completed the survey and were included in the LEPRE study. They were compared to 1114 unselected people living in the same geographical area of Italy, namely the Friuli Venezia Giulia region. The survey responders’ characteristics were different between the LEPRE and PRESTO; the LEPRE group showed a higher percentage of females [88% (56) vs 61% (673), p<0.001] and subjects with lower educational level (prevalently high school) [University: 28% (18) vs 49% (548), p=0.001]. The SLE subjects live mainly in detached houses [59% (38) vs 31% (348), p<0.001], having access to a private garden [81% (52) vs 56% (625), p<0.001] and also owning a pet [67% (43) vs 46% (508), p=0.001], in comparison with the PRESTO sample living mainly in flats [39% (25) vs 66% (740), p<0.001] (Table 1).
Table 1

Descriptive Statistics of the Survey Responders

AnswerN. of RespondersResponseLEPRE (N=64)PRESTO (N=1114)Combined (N=1178)P value
How old are you?1178Age, median (I–III interquartile range)43.0 (35–54.5)47.0 (34–57)47.0 (35–56.8)0.6
1178≤29 years16% (10)19% (207)18% (217)0.112
29–65 years81% (52)71% (791)72% (843)
>65 years3% (2)10% (116)10% (118)
What is your gender1176Female88% (56)61% (673)62% (729)<0.001
Male12% (8)39% (439)38% (447)
Please specify your nationality1178Other3% (2)2% (20)2% (22)0.445
Italian97% (62)98% (1094)98% (1156)
What is your level of education?1178High School70% (45)51% (563)52% (608)0.001
University28% (18)49% (548)48% (566)
Secondary school2% (1)0% (3)0% (4)
What is your employment status?1178Employed97% (62)92% (1029)93% (1091)0.18
Student3% (2)8% (85)7% (87)
What is your house like?1178Flat39% (25)66% (740)65% (765)<0.001
Studio flat2% (1)2% (26)2% (27)
Detached house59% (38)31% (348)33% (386)
Can you access a private garden?1176No19% (12)44% (487)42% (499)<0.001
Yes81% (52)56% (625)58% (677)
Did you take the swab test?633No81% (51)96% (548)95% (599)<0.001
Yes19% (12)4% (22)5% (34)
Have you lost anyone during this period?629No89% (56)90% (509)90% (565)0.796
Yes11% (7)10% (57)10% (64)
Besides yourself, how many people live in your home?1153I do not live alone94% (59)85% (924)85% (983)0.053
I live alone6% (4)15% (166)15% (170)
AFTER the measures taken by the government to contain the spread of the coronavirus since you have been in quarantine do you habitually practice some physical activity967No73% (43)57% (516)58% (559)0.016
Yes27% (16)43% (392)42% (408)
Own a pet1178No33% (21)54% (606)53% (627)0.001
Yes67% (43)46% (508)47% (551)

Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters.

Descriptive Statistics of the Survey Responders Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters. Moreover, a greater percentage of the LEPRE study group had a swab test during the pandemic [19% (12) vs 4% (22), p<0.001]. The LEPRE sample practiced less frequent physical activity during the quarantine in comparison with the PRESTO group [27% (16) vs 43% (392), p=0.016] (Table 1). However, after matching the sample using the propensity score all the standardized mean differences lie in the +-0.1 threshold indicating a suitable balance across groups (). One hundred and twenty-eight matched people from the PRESTO study were compared to the 64 SLE patients. The median age among patients was 43 years (I–III interquartile range 35–54.5), 88% were female and 100% Caucasian. No significant differences were identified in the groups’ characteristics after the matching procedure (Table 2).
Table 2

Descriptive Statistics of the Survey Responders Post Propensity Score Matching

AnswerN. of RespondersVariableLEPRE (N=64)PRESTO (N=128)Combined (N=192)P value
How old are you?192Age, median (I–III interquartile range)43 (35–54.5)46 (39.5–55)45.5 (37.8–55)0.467
Age class192<2916% (10)9% (12)11% (22)0.438
29–6581% (52)88% (112)85% (164)
65+3% (2)3% (4)3% (6)
What is your gender192Female88% (56)85% (109)86% (165)0.66
Male12% (8)15% (19)14% (27)
Please specify your nationality192Other3% (2)2% (2)2% (4)0.475
Italian97% (62)98% (126)98% (188)
What is your level of education?192High School70% (45)64% (82)66% (127)0.681
University28% (18)34% (44)32% (62)
Secondary school2% (1)2% (2)2% (3)
What is your employment status?192Employed97% (62)97% (124)97% (186)1
Student3% (2)3% (4)3% (6)
What is your house like?192Flat39% (25)38% (49)39% (74)0.872
Studio flat2% (1)1% (1)1% (2)
Detached house59% (38)61% (78)60% (116)
Can you access a private garden?192No19% (12)19% (24)19% (36)1
Yes81% (52)81% (104)81% (156)
Did you take the swab test?126No81% (51)86% (54)83% (105)0.473
Yes19% (12)14% (9)17% (21)
Have you lost anyone during this period?125No89% (56)94% (58)91% (114)0.358
Yes11% (7)6% (4)9% (11)
Besides yourself, how many people live in your home?188I do not live alone94% (59)94% (118)94% (177)0.836
I live alone6% (4)6% (7)6% (11)
AFTER the measures taken by the government to contain the spread of the coronavirus since you have been in quarantine do you habitually practice some physical activity163No73% (43)73% (76)73% (119)0.978
Yes27% (16)27% (28)27% (44)
Own a pet192No33% (21)33% (42)33% (63)1
Yes67% (43)67% (86)67% (129)
Mental health scores
GHQ-12 Total score1810–1315% (9)12% (14)13% (23)0.556
14–3685% (52)88% (106)87% (158)
IES-R Total score1780–2343% (26)51% (60)48% (86)0.825
24–3227% (16)23% (27)24% (43)
33–367% (4)6% (7)6% (11)
37–8823% (14)20% (24)21% (38)
CES-D Total score1760–1555% (33)60% (70)59% (103)0.727
16–2327% (16)22% (25)23% (41)
24–6018% (11)18% (21)18% (32)
Descriptive Statistics of the Survey Responders Post Propensity Score Matching The psychological impact measured by IES-R [(score>23: 57% (34) vs 49% (58)], GHQ-12 [(score>13: 85% (52) vs 88% (106)], and CES-D [(score>15: 45% (28) vs 40% (46)] scores were not statistically different between patients and the general population (p>0.05) (Table 2). As regards missing activities, patients with SLE missed playing sports/exercise less than general population [19% (12) vs 36% (46), p=0.017)], while they felt more the lack of the company of family and relatives [71% (45) vs 33% (42), p<0.001] (Table 3).
Table 3

Descriptive Statistics of the Missing Activities (“Which of the Following Activities are You Missing the Most During This Quarantine Period?”) During the COVID-19 Quarantine (Post-Propensity Match Sample)

AnswerN. of RespondersResponseLEPRE (N=64)PRESTO (N=128)Combined (N=192)P value
Going to the cinema, theatre.191Not selected75% (47)73% (94)74% (141)0.863
Yes25% (16)27% (34)26% (50)
Playing sports/exercise.191Not selected81% (51)64% (82)70% (133)0.017
Yes19% (12)36% (46)30% (58)
Going to exhibitions and museums.191Not selected89% (56)88% (112)88% (168)0.782
Yes11% (7)12% (16)12% (23)
Going to nightclubs.191Not selected98% (62)98% (125)98% (187)0.731
Yes2% (1)2% (3)2% (4)
Attending sporting events.191Not selected95% (60)91% (117)93% (177)0.339
Yes5% (3)9% (11)7% (14)
Going out to eat.191Not selected56% (35)52% (66)53% (101)0.603
Yes44% (28)48% (62)47% (90)
Going to coffee shops.191Not selected84% (53)84% (107)84% (160)0.925
Yes16% (10)16% (21)16% (31)
Gardening.191Not selected95% (60)97% (124)96% (184)0.571
Yes5% (3)3% (4)4% (7)
Going out for a walk.191Not selected40% (25)38% (49)39% (74)0.852
Yes60% (38)62% (79)61% (117)
Going out with friends.191Not selected40% (25)41% (53)41% (78)0.82
Yes60% (38)59% (75)59% (113)
Seeing the family.191Not selected29% (18)67% (86)54% (104)<0.001
Yes71% (45)33% (42)46% (87)
Going shopping.191Not selected78% (49)75% (96)76% (145)0.673
Yes22% (14)25% (32)24% (46)
Going to work.191Not selected75% (47)70% (89)71% (136)0.467
Yes25% (16)30% (39)29% (55)

Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters.

Descriptive Statistics of the Missing Activities (“Which of the Following Activities are You Missing the Most During This Quarantine Period?”) During the COVID-19 Quarantine (Post-Propensity Match Sample) Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters. Concerning the responders’ feelings during the quarantine, COVID-19 concerns, anxiety, and depression rates as well as feelings were not different between patients and general population (Table 4). However, patients perceived more difficulty to find some more free time and enjoy it [21% (13) vs 39% (47), p=0.01)] and to be able to solve own problems more than usual [(0 vs 11% (13), p=0.02)] (Table 4). On the contrary, patients felt less sad or depressed than usual [28% (17) vs 11% (13), p=0.003] in comparison with the PRESTO group (Table 4). Moreover, the PRESTO group less frequently avoided discussions that could remind them of the pandemic [(37% (22) vs 56% (66), p=0.02)] (Table 4).
Table 4

Descriptive Statistics of the Responder’s Feeling (“Since the Government Started the Restrictive Measures Since You are in Quarantine, What Do You Feel When You Think About the Pandemic and the Coronavirus?”) During the COVID-19 Quarantine (Post-Propensity Match Sample)

AnswerN. of RespondersResponseLEPRE (N=64)PRESTO (N=128)Combined (N=192)P value
Do you have difficulty concentrating on what you do? Can you follow the train of thought? Concentrate when reading, at work, etc.?181As usual69% (42)57% (68)61% (110)0.111
Less than usual8% (5)18% (22)15% (27)
Much less than usual2% (1)7% (8)5% (9)
More than usual21% (13)18% (22)19% (35)
Do you think you have lost a lot of sleep, enough to make you worry?181As usual57% (35)52% (63)54% (98)0.12
Less than usual23% (14)13% (16)17% (30)
Much less than usual7% (4)16% (19)13% (23)
More than usual13% (8)18% (22)17% (30)
Do you think you are productive, are you able to do many things during the day?181As usual48% (29)38% (45)41% (74)0.527
Less than usual21% (13)29% (35)27% (48)
Much less than usual8% (5)11% (13)10% (18)
More than usual23% (14)22% (27)23% (41)
Do you think you are able to make decisions most of the time?181As usual77% (47)81% (97)80% (144)0.796
Less than usual16% (10)13% (16)14% (26)
Much less than usual0% (0)1% (1)1% (1)
More than usual7% (4)5% (6)6% (10)
Do you feel constantly under pressure?181As usual33% (20)34% (41)34% (61)0.52
Less than usual10% (6)18% (21)15% (27)
Much less than usual10% (6)8% (10)9% (16)
More than usual48% (29)40% (48)43% (77)
Do you think you are able to overcome difficulties right now?181As usual52% (32)56% (67)55% (99)0.965
Less than usual15% (9)15% (18)15% (27)
Much less than usual2% (1)2% (2)2% (3)
More than usual31% (19)28% (33)29% (52)
During this period, are you able to find some free time and enjoy it?181As usual46% (28)25% (30)32% (58)0.013
Less than usual20% (12)27% (32)24% (44)
Much less than usual13% (8)9% (11)10% (19)
More than usual21% (13)39% (47)33% (60)
In this situation, do you feel able to solve your problems?181As usual77% (47)59% (71)65% (118)0.025
Less than usual18% (11)24% (29)22% (40)
Much less than usual5% (3)6% (7)6% (10)
More than usual0% (0)11% (13)7% (13)
Sad or depressed.181As usual38% (23)46% (55)43% (78)0.022
Less than usual18% (11)5% (6)9% (17)
Much less than usual10% (6)6% (7)7% (13)
More than usual34% (21)43% (52)40% (73)
As if I have lost confidence in myself.181As usual54% (33)68% (82)64% (115)0.168
Less than usual15% (9)9% (11)11% (20)
Much less than usual18% (11)9% (11)12% (22)
More than usual13% (8)13% (16)13% (24)
As if I had less self-esteem.181As usual57% (35)74% (89)69% (124)0.092
Less than usual16% (10)8% (10)11% (20)
Much less than usual16% (10)8% (10)11% (20)
More than usual10% (6)9% (11)9% (17)
With a overall happy emotional state.181As usual51% (31)45% (54)47% (85)0.392
Less than usual28% (17)34% (41)32% (58)
Much less than usual7% (4)12% (14)10% (18)
More than usual15% (9)9% (11)11% (20)
Everything that reminds me of the pandemic makes me feel emotions.178Quite a bit32% (19)35% (41)34% (60)0.589
Extremely17% (10)8% (10)11% (20)
Moderately18% (11)21% (25)20% (36)
Not at all7% (4)8% (10)8% (14)
A little bit27% (16)27% (32)27% (48)
I had difficulty staying asleep.178Quite a bit15% (9)15% (18)15% (27)0.806
Extremely5% (3)2% (2)3% (5)
Moderately12% (7)13% (15)12% (22)
Not at all43% (26)44% (52)44% (78)
A little bit25% (15)26% (31)26% (46)
Things that do not concern the pandemic make me think about it anyway.178Quite a bit18% (11)16% (19)17% (30)0.907
Extremely3% (2)2% (2)2% (4)
Moderately20% (12)20% (24)20% (36)
Not at all27% (16)25% (29)25% (45)
A little bit32% (19)37% (44)35% (63)
I feel irritable and angry.178Quite a bit15% (9)19% (22)17% (31)0.221
Extremely10% (6)3% (3)5% (9)
Moderately22% (13)20% (24)21% (37)
Not at all23% (14)31% (37)29% (51)
A little bit30% (18)27% (32)28% (50)
I avoid getting upset when I think about it or it is reminded me by others.178Quite a bit17% (10)21% (25)20% (35)0.844
Extremely7% (4)5% (6)6% (10)
Moderately27% (16)28% (33)28% (49)
Not at all20% (12)14% (17)16% (29)
A little bit30% (18)31% (37)31% (55)
I think about it without intending to.178Quite a bit20% (12)10% (12)13% (24)0.16
Extremely3% (2)4% (5)4% (7)
Moderately28% (17)21% (25)24% (42)
Not at all20% (12)19% (23)20% (35)
A little bit28% (17)45% (53)39% (70)
I have a feeling it did not happen or it is not real.178Quite a bit13% (8)10% (12)11% (20)0.187
Extremely0% (0)2% (2)1% (2)
Moderately12% (7)17% (20)15% (27)
Not at all60% (36)45% (53)50% (89)
A little bit15% (9)26% (31)22% (40)
I avoided things that could remind it to me.178Quite a bit3% (2)8% (10)7% (12)0.029
Extremely3% (2)1% (1)2% (3)
Moderately17% (10)12% (14)13% (24)
Not at all37% (22)56% (66)49% (88)
A little bit40% (24)23% (27)29% (51)
Some images about the pandemic, coronavirus, come to mind suddenly.178Quite a bit5% (3)6% (7)6% (10)0.343
Extremely3% (2)3% (4)3% (6)
Moderately23% (14)14% (16)17% (30)
Not at all35% (21)49% (58)44% (79)
A little bit33% (20)28% (33)30% (53)
I am nervous and easily scared.178Quite a bit13% (8)9% (11)11% (19)0.787
Extremely3% (2)4% (5)4% (7)
Moderately15% (9)11% (13)12% (22)
Not at all37% (22)44% (52)42% (74)
A little bit32% (19)31% (37)31% (56)
I try not to think about it.178Quite a bit20% (12)21% (25)21% (37)0.452
Extremely10% (6)3% (4)6% (10)
Moderately22% (13)19% (23)20% (36)
Not at all17% (10)20% (24)19% (34)
A little bit32% (19)36% (42)34% (61)
I am aware that I still can not manage all my emotions regarding the pandemic, coronavirus.178Quite a bit18% (11)12% (14)14% (25)0.841
Extremely3% (2)4% (5)4% (7)
Moderately22% (13)23% (27)22% (40)
Not at all28% (17)31% (36)30% (53)
A little bit28% (17)31% (36)30% (53)
My feelings about it are kind of numb.178Quite a bit7% (4)8% (9)7% (13)0.54
Extremely0% (0)3% (3)2% (3)
Moderately10% (6)16% (19)14% (25)
Not at all58% (35)52% (61)54% (96)
A little bit25% (15)22% (26)23% (41)
I found myself acting or feeling as though I was back at the time when the quarantine was announced.178Quite a bit7% (4)4% (5)5% (9)0.5
Extremely0% (0)0% (0)0% (0)
Moderately20% (12)16% (19)17% (31)
Not at all48% (29)60% (71)56% (100)
A little bit25% (15)19% (23)21% (38)
I have trouble falling asleep.178Quite a bit7% (4)9% (11)8% (15)0.22
Extremely8% (5)4% (5)6% (10)
Moderately12% (7)9% (11)10% (18)
Not at all43% (26)58% (69)53% (95)
A little bit30% (18)19% (22)22% (40)
I have waves of strong feelings when I think about it.178Quite a bit18% (11)15% (18)16% (29)0.519
Extremely3% (2)6% (7)5% (9)
Moderately27% (16)19% (23)22% (39)
Not at all18% (11)28% (33)25% (44)
A little bit33% (20)31% (37)32% (57)
I tried to remove it from my memory.178Quite a bit13% (8)11% (13)12% (21)0.683
Extremely2% (1)7% (8)5% (9)
Moderately20% (12)19% (22)19% (34)
Not at all43% (26)42% (50)43% (76)
A little bit22% (13)21% (25)21% (38)
I have trouble concentrating.178Quite a bit12% (7)8% (10)10% (17)0.896
Extremely3% (2)4% (5)4% (7)
Moderately10% (6)8% (10)9% (16)
Not at all45% (27)52% (61)49% (88)
A little bit30% (18)27% (32)28% (50)
Reminders of it cause me to have physical reactions, such as sweating, trouble breathing, nausea, or a pounding heart.178Quite a bit7% (4)3% (3)4% (7)0.594
Extremely3% (2)2% (2)2% (4)
Moderately5% (3)4% (5)4% (8)
Not at all67% (40)75% (89)72% (129)
A little bit18% (11)16% (19)17% (30)
I have dreams about the pandemic/coronavirus.178Quite a bit5% (3)2% (2)3% (5)0.582
Extremely3% (2)2% (2)2% (4)
Moderately2% (1)4% (5)3% (6)
Not at all75% (45)78% (92)77% (137)
A little bit15% (9)14% (17)15% (26)
I have become watchful and on-guard with people and the environment.178Quite a bit27% (16)18% (21)21% (37)0.117
Extremely15% (9)7% (8)10% (17)
Moderately25% (15)24% (28)24% (43)
Not at all15% (9)21% (25)19% (34)
A little bit18% (11)31% (36)26% (47)
I try not to talk about the pandemic/coronavirus.178Quite a bit7% (4)5% (6)6% (10)0.459
Extremely2% (1)2% (2)2% (3)
Moderately17% (10)26% (31)23% (41)
Not at all50% (30)37% (44)42% (74)
A little bit25% (15)30% (35)28% (50)

Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters.

Descriptive Statistics of the Responder’s Feeling (“Since the Government Started the Restrictive Measures Since You are in Quarantine, What Do You Feel When You Think About the Pandemic and the Coronavirus?”) During the COVID-19 Quarantine (Post-Propensity Match Sample) Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters. Regarding emotional status, the patients also very rarely or never had the impression that people did not like them [(93% (56) vs 75% (87). p=0.003)] (Table 5).
Table 5

Descriptive Statistics of the Responder’s Emotional Status During the COVID-19 Quarantine (Post-Propensity Match Sample) (“the Following Questions Refer to the Quarantine Period”)

AnswerN. of RespondersResponseLEPRE (N=64)PRESTO (N=128)Combined (N=192)P value
I have been hindered by things that do not usually bother me.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)0% (0)3% (4)2% (4)0.098
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)47% (28)60% (70)56% (98)
Very often (3 to 4 days)13% (8)8% (9)10% (17)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)40% (24)28% (33)32% (57)
I had no desire to eat nor appetite.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)2% (1)3% (3)2% (4)0.59
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)83% (50)83% (96)83% (146)
Very often (3 to 4 days)2% (1)5% (6)4% (7)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)13% (8)9% (11)11% (19)
I got the impression that I could not get out of depression.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)0% (0)1% (1)1% (1)0.871
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)85% (51)82% (95)83% (146)
Very often (3 to 4 days)3% (2)4% (5)4% (7)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)12% (7)13% (15)12% (22)
I had the feeling of being different from others.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)5% (3)3% (4)4% (7)0.078
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)50% (30)67% (78)61% (108)
Very often (3 to 4 days)23% (14)10% (12)15% (26)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)22% (13)19% (22)20% (35)
I had trouble concentrating on what I was doing.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)0% (0)9% (10)6% (10)0.118
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)55% (33)54% (63)55% (96)
Very often (3 to 4 days)12% (7)9% (10)10% (17)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)33% (20)28% (33)30% (53)
I felt depressed.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)2% (1)4% (5)3% (6)0.576
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)62% (37)59% (69)60% (106)
Very often (3 to 4 days)8% (5)13% (15)11% (20)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)28% (17)23% (27)25% (44)
I got the impression that any action required a lot of effort.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)2% (1)6% (7)5% (8)0.3
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)53% (32)60% (70)58% (102)
Very often (3 to 4 days)17% (10)15% (17)15% (27)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)28% (17)19% (22)22% (39)
I have faith in the future.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)13% (8)28% (32)23% (40)0.193
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)13% (8)9% (11)11% (19)
Very often (3 to 4 days)42% (25)35% (41)38% (66)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)32% (19)28% (32)29% (51)
I thought my life was a failure.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)0% (0)3% (3)2% (3)0.638
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)78% (47)74% (86)76% (133)
Very often (3 to 4 days)8% (5)9% (10)9% (15)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)13% (8)15% (17)14% (25)
I felt scared.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)10% (6)3% (3)5% (9)0.079
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)32% (19)33% (38)32% (57)
Very often (3 to 4 days)28% (17)22% (25)24% (42)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)30% (18)43% (50)39% (68)
I can not sleep well.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)8% (5)5% (6)6% (11)0.495
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)47% (28)58% (67)54% (95)
Very often (3 to 4 days)8% (5)9% (10)9% (15)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)37% (22)28% (33)31% (55)
I have been happy.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)7% (4)11% (13)10% (17)0.103
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)7% (4)17% (20)14% (24)
Very often (3 to 4 days)50% (30)35% (41)40% (71)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)37% (22)36% (42)36% (64)
I talked less than usual.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)3% (2)4% (5)4% (7)0.853
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)57% (34)58% (67)57% (101)
Very often (3 to 4 days)7% (4)9% (11)9% (15)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)33% (20)28% (33)30% (53)
I felt alone.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)5% (3)4% (5)5% (8)0.95
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)48% (29)52% (60)51% (89)
Very often (3 to 4 days)17% (10)14% (16)15% (26)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)30% (18)30% (35)30% (53)
Other people have been hostile towards me.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)2% (1)1% (1)1% (2)0.588
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)85% (51)78% (90)80% (141)
Very often (3 to 4 days)3% (2)5% (6)5% (8)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)10% (6)16% (19)14% (25)
I enjoyed life.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)12% (7)15% (17)14% (24)0.829
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)22% (13)26% (30)24% (43)
Very often (3 to 4 days)28% (17)26% (30)27% (47)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)38% (23)34% (39)35% (62)
I had crying fits.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)5% (3)2% (2)3% (5)0.471
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)62% (37)71% (82)68% (119)
Very often (3 to 4 days)10% (6)9% (11)10% (17)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)23% (14)18% (21)20% (35)
I felt sad.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)5% (3)7% (8)6% (11)0.93
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)28% (17)28% (32)28% (49)
Very often (3 to 4 days)13% (8)16% (18)15% (26)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)53% (32)50% (58)51% (90)
I have the impression that people do not like me.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)0% (0)3% (4)2% (4)0.029
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)93% (56)75% (87)81% (143)
Very often (3 to 4 days)2% (1)4% (5)3% (6)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)5% (3)17% (20)13% (23)
I lack motivation.176Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)2% (1)5% (6)4% (7)0.095
Never/Very rarely (less than a day)57% (34)54% (63)55% (97)
Very often (3 to 4 days)22% (13)10% (12)14% (25)
Occasionally (1 to 2 days)20% (12)30% (35)27% (47)

Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters.

Descriptive Statistics of the Responder’s Emotional Status During the COVID-19 Quarantine (Post-Propensity Match Sample) (“the Following Questions Refer to the Quarantine Period”) Note: Significant P values between LEPRE and PRESTO groups are expressed in bold characters. Finally, no differences were evidenced for dietary habits during the quarantine among groups, except for a greater consumption of eggs per week for the PRESTO group [(median (I–III quartile range): 1 (1–2) vs 2 (1–2), p=0.005)] (). Notably, two sub analyses performed by comparing LEPRE subjects only with people with chronic diseases (–), or only with healthy volunteers retrieved the same results (–). The clusters’ characteristics are reported in : cluster 1 is composed in prevalence of males reporting a better situation from the point of view of psychological distress on both the GHQ and IES -R scales along with the depression scale CES-D, while cluster 2 is mainly composed of females reporting worse psychological distress on the GHQ-12 together with the IES-R scale and CES-D score. The two clusters are characterized by similar frequencies of people coming from the LEPRE and PRESTO cohorts indicating an overall homogeneity across the survey groups of responders (). Interestingly, independently from belonging to the LEPRE or PRESTO cohort, women showed the worst IES-R, GHQ-12, and CES-D scores ().

Discussion

Concerns, healthcare-related behaviors and psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic among patients with rheumatic diseases and in particular with SLE have been investigated by several works, reporting a trend towards remarkable psychological distress, however with contrasting results; more specifically, the effect of restrictive measures among the same populations has been less analysed.15–19 Our hypothesis, was that not only the fear of the infection but also the restriction-based strategy might upset the life of patients with SLE. To minimize attribution bias due to disease activity, we selected only SLE patients who were in remission or with low disease activity at the last follow-up visit, and we compared them to the general population, utilizing the same survey form pertaining to the same lockdown period. Globally, lockdown measures showed a great psychological impact on both patients and general population, half or more than half of both groups disclosing high scores of IES-R, GHQ-12 and CES-D questionnaires. However, our study showed no differences between SLE patients and the general population in IES-R, GHQ-12 and CES-D scores, while feeling sad or depressed was more common in the general population than in the patients, thus supporting the concept of resilience of SLE due to a previously adaptation to a difficult context (ie, chronic inflammatory disease). Patients did not show significant differences in their behavior if compared to the general population, except for two aspects: “missing playing sports or exercise” (less impact) and “missing to see the family” (more impact). No difference to the general population was observed about anxiety or depression rate, self-esteem, confidence in the future, sleep disorders, appetite, or even food consumption. On the other hand, the patients could be more able to cope with the problem of the outbreak, also by “avoiding things that could remind it”, that refers to a previously adopted coping strategy. Interestingly, the patients’ lifestyle (eg, living in detached houses, having access to a private garden and also owning a pet) could contribute to cope with restrictions. Notably, this coping strategy might be of value also for healthy people, in order to limit the psychological distress of restrictive measures and to mitigate the risk of mental disorders. Indeed, the possibility of communicating with medical staff can affect patients’ ability to adapt to the stressful situation caused by the pandemic.20 Finally, patients consumed fewer eggs than general population, adhering more tightly to the Mediterranean diet. Thus, resilience of patients with SLE probably rests on three pillars: family and relatives, lifestyle and access to care (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The three pillars of lupus patients’ resilience.

The three pillars of lupus patients’ resilience. Limits of our study were the lack of knowledge of the pre-pandemic lifestyle of the enrolled patients and the anonymous nature of the questionnaire, that did not allow us to perform clinical associations. Also, the correct inclusion of PRESTO responders in the two categories (with or without chronic disease) could not be verified by a doctor due to the self-administered nature of the questionnaire. On the other hand, the high number of participants in the PRESTO study and the reproducibility of the results in all the three sub analyses, after the propensity score matching procedures, resulted in a robust comparison between patients and general population minimizing potential selection bias. Also, generalizability of the conclusion is limited, since the inclusion criteria comprised remission or low disease activity state, while patients with neuropsychiatric features were excluded. However, by excluding confounding factors such as different levels of disease activity as well as the presence of psychiatric features, the study selected a group of SLE patients as homogeneous as possible. To conclude, restrictive measures for contrasting the COVID-19 pandemic did not unveil a greater psychological fragility of people living with SLE than the other people. By contrast, a coping strategy for managing a chronic autoimmune disease, including the role of the family and the lifestyle, contributes to resilience of SLE in difficult scenarios such as those presented by the pandemic.
  17 in total

1.  Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Hwa Jung Kim; Guillaume Lonjon; Yibing Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-01

2.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Effect of COVID-19 confinement on the mental status of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Ana Santos-Ruiz; Eva Montero-López; Norberto Ortego-Centeno; María Isabel Peralta-Ramírez
Journal:  Med Clin (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-03-18

4.  Treatment targets in SLE: remission and low disease activity state.

Authors:  Vera Golder; Michel W P Tsang-A-Sjoe
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Dutch people with and without an inflammatory rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Tim Y Koppert; Johannes W G Jacobs; Rinie Geenen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Concerns, Healthcare Use, and Treatment Interruptions in Patients With Common Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Michael D George; Shilpa Venkatachalam; Shubhasree Banerjee; Joshua F Baker; Peter A Merkel; Kelly Gavigan; David Curtis; Maria I Danila; Jeffrey R Curtis; W Benjamin Nowell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Karen Costenbader; David Daikh; Ralph Brinks; Marta Mosca; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Josef S Smolen; David Wofsy; Dimitrios T Boumpas; Diane L Kamen; David Jayne; Ricard Cervera; Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau; Betty Diamond; Dafna D Gladman; Bevra Hahn; Falk Hiepe; Søren Jacobsen; Dinesh Khanna; Kirsten Lerstrøm; Elena Massarotti; Joseph McCune; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Matthias Schneider; Murray Urowitz; George Bertsias; Bimba F Hoyer; Nicolai Leuchten; Chiara Tani; Sara K Tedeschi; Zahi Touma; Gabriela Schmajuk; Branimir Anic; Florence Assan; Tak Mao Chan; Ann Elaine Clarke; Mary K Crow; László Czirják; Andrea Doria; Winfried Graninger; Bernadett Halda-Kiss; Sarfaraz Hasni; Peter M Izmirly; Michelle Jung; Gábor Kumánovics; Xavier Mariette; Ivan Padjen; José M Pego-Reigosa; Juanita Romero-Diaz; Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa Fernández; Raphaèle Seror; Georg H Stummvoll; Yoshiya Tanaka; Maria G Tektonidou; Carlos Vasconcelos; Edward M Vital; Daniel J Wallace; Sule Yavuz; Pier Luigi Meroni; Marvin J Fritzler; Ray Naden; Thomas Dörner; Sindhu R Johnson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 15.483

8.  Resilience and treatment adhesion in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Daniella Antunes Pousa Faria; Luciana Silva Revoredo; Maria José Vilar; Maia Eulália Maria Chaves
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2014-02-21

9.  Association of Primary Humoral Immunodeficiencies With Psychiatric Disorders and Suicidal Behavior and the Role of Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Josef Isung; Kyle Williams; Kayoko Isomura; Caroline Gromark; Eva Hesselmark; Paul Lichtenstein; Henrik Larsson; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Anna Sidorchuk; David Mataix-Cols
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 21.596

10.  Fluctuation, invisibility, fatigue - the barriers to maintaining employment with systemic lupus erythematosus: results of an online survey.

Authors:  S Booth; E Price; E Walker
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.911

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systemic lupus erythematosus in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic: infection, vaccination, and impact on disease management.

Authors:  Pankti Mehta; Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Olena Zimba; George D Kitas
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  The impact of COVID-19 stress on pain and fatigue in people with and without a central sensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  Tim Y Koppert; Johannes W G Jacobs; Mark A Lumley; Rinie Geenen
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.