Literature DB >> 34168203

Deterministic and stochastic modelling of impacts from genomic selection and phenomics on genetic gain for perennial ryegrass dry matter yield.

M Z Z Jahufer1, Sai Krishna Arojju2, Marty J Faville2, Kioumars Ghamkhar2, Dongwen Luo2, Vivi Arief3, Wen-Hsi Yang3, Mingzhu Sun4, Ian H DeLacy3, Andrew G Griffiths2, Colin Eady5, Will Clayton5, Alan V Stewart6, Richard M George6, Valerio Hoyos-Villegas7, Kaye E Basford3, Brent Barrett2.   

Abstract

Increasing the efficiency of current forage breeding programs through adoption of new technologies, such as genomic selection (GS) and phenomics (Ph), is challenging without proof of concept demonstrating cost effective genetic gain (∆G). This paper uses decision support software DeltaGen (tactical tool) and QU-GENE (strategic tool), to model and assess relative efficiency of five breeding methods. The effect on ∆G and cost ($) of integrating GS and Ph into an among half-sib (HS) family phenotypic selection breeding strategy was investigated. Deterministic and stochastic modelling were conducted using mock data sets of 200 and 1000 perennial ryegrass HS families using year-by-season-by-location dry matter (DM) yield data and in silico generated data, respectively. Results demonstrated short (deterministic)- and long-term (stochastic) impacts of breeding strategy and integration of key technologies, GS and Ph, on ∆G. These technologies offer substantial improvements in the rate of ∆G, and in some cases improved cost-efficiency. Applying 1% within HS family GS, predicted a 6.35 and 8.10% ∆G per cycle for DM yield from the 200 HS and 1000 HS, respectively. The application of GS in both among and within HS selection provided a significant boost to total annual ∆G, even at low GS accuracy rA of 0.12. Despite some reduction in ∆G, using Ph to assess seasonal DM yield clearly demonstrated its impact by reducing cost per percentage ∆G relative to standard DM cuts. Open-source software tools, DeltaGen and QuLinePlus/QU-GENE, offer ways to model the impact of breeding methodology and technology integration under a range of breeding scenarios.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34168203     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92537-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  13 in total

1.  QU-GENE: a simulation platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models.

Authors:  D W Podlich; M Cooper
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Plant Phenomics, From Sensors to Knowledge.

Authors:  François Tardieu; Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet; Tony Pridmore; Malcolm Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool.

Authors:  Alexander E Lipka; Feng Tian; Qishan Wang; Jason Peiffer; Meng Li; Peter J Bradbury; Michael A Gore; Edward S Buckler; Zhiwu Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Plant phenomics: an overview of image acquisition technologies and image data analysis algorithms.

Authors:  Fernando Perez-Sanz; Pedro J Navarro; Marcos Egea-Cortines
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 5.  Review: New sensors and data-driven approaches-A path to next generation phenomics.

Authors:  Thomas Roitsch; Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet; Antoine Fournier; Kioumars Ghamkhar; José Jiménez-Berni; Francisco Pinto; Eric S Ober
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.729

6.  Predicting the quality of ryegrass using hyperspectral imaging.

Authors:  Paul R Shorten; Shane R Leath; Jana Schmidt; Kioumars Ghamkhar
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.993

7.  Identification of an SCPL Gene Controlling Anthocyanin Acylation in Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Root.

Authors:  Julien Curaba; Hamed Bostan; Pablo F Cavagnaro; Douglas Senalik; Molla Fentie Mengist; Yunyang Zhao; Philipp W Simon; Massimo Iorizzo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; Nathaniel D Mueller; Paul C West; Jonathan A Foley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  QuLinePlus: extending plant breeding strategy and genetic model simulation to cross-pollinated populations-case studies in forage breeding.

Authors:  Valerio Hoyos-Villegas; Vivi N Arief; Wen-Hsi Yang; Mingzhu Sun; Ian H DeLacy; Brent A Barrett; Zulfi Jahufer; Kaye E Basford
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantitative genetic analysis reveals potential to breed for improved white clover growth in symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium bacteria.

Authors:  Sean K Weith; M Z Zulfi Jahufer; Rainer W Hofmann; Craig B Anderson; Dongwen Luo; O Grace Ehoche; Greig Cousins; E Eirian Jones; Ross A Ballard; Andrew G Griffiths
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.