Literature DB >> 34168199

Influence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials on micrococcal nuclease and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Colin W K Rosman1, Henny C van der Mei1, Jelmer Sjollema2.   

Abstract

A major contributor to biomaterial associated infection (BAI) is Staphylococcus aureus. This pathogen produces a protective biofilm, making eradication difficult. Biofilms are composed of bacteria encapsulated in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) comprising polysaccharides, proteins and extracellular DNA (eDNA). S. aureus also produces micrococcal nuclease (MN), an endonuclease which contributes to biofilm composition and dispersion, mainly expressed by nuc1. MN expression can be modulated by sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials. We investigated the relation between the biofilm and MN expression and the impact of the application of antimicrobial pressure on this relation. Planktonic and biofilm cultures of three S. aureus strains, including a nuc1 deficient strain, were cultured under antimicrobial pressure. Results do not confirm earlier findings that MN directly influences total biomass of the biofilm but indicated that nuc1 deletion stimulates the polysaccharide production per CFU in the biofilm in in vitro biofilms. Though antimicrobial pressure of certain antibiotics resulted in significantly increased quantities of polysaccharides per CFU, this did not coincide with significantly reduced MN activity. Erythromycin and resveratrol significantly reduced MN production per CFU but did not affect total biomass or biomass/CFU. Reduction of MN production may assist in the eradication of biofilms by the host immune system in clinical situations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34168199     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92619-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  39 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterial-associated infection: locating the finish line in the race for the surface.

Authors:  Henk J Busscher; Henny C van der Mei; Guruprakash Subbiahdoss; Paul C Jutte; Jan J A M van den Dungen; Sebastian A J Zaat; Marcus J Schultz; David W Grainger
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Continued rise in rates of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in the United States: temporal trends and causative insights.

Authors:  Andrew Voigt; Alaa Shalaby; Samir Saba
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Comparative expression analysis of two thermostable nuclease genes in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yu Hu; Yanping Xie; Junni Tang; Xianming Shi
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 4.  Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Jost Wingender; Ulrich Szewzyk; Peter Steinberg; Scott A Rice; Staffan Kjelleberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates.

Authors:  C R Arciola; Y H An; D Campoccia; M E Donati; L Montanaro
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  An Electrostatic Net Model for the Role of Extracellular DNA in Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Vanina Dengler; Lucy Foulston; Alicia S DeFrancesco; Richard Losick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Staphylococcus aureus chronic and relapsing infections: Evidence of a role for persister cells: An investigation of persister cells, their formation and their role in S. aureus disease.

Authors:  Brian P Conlon
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  A distinguishable role of eDNA in the viscoelastic relaxation of biofilms.

Authors:  Brandon W Peterson; Henny C van der Mei; Jelmer Sjollema; Henk J Busscher; Prashant K Sharma
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Modulation of eDNA release and degradation affects Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation.

Authors:  Ethan E Mann; Kelly C Rice; Blaise R Boles; Jennifer L Endres; Dev Ranjit; Lakshmi Chandramohan; Laura H Tsang; Mark S Smeltzer; Alexander R Horswill; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal and stochastic control of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm development.

Authors:  Derek E Moormeier; Jeffrey L Bose; Alexander R Horswill; Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The biofilm matrix: multitasking in a shared space.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Eric D van Hullebusch; Thomas R Neu; Per H Nielsen; Thomas Seviour; Paul Stoodley; Jost Wingender; Stefan Wuertz
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 78.297

Review 2.  Strategies to prevent, curb and eliminate biofilm formation based on the characteristics of various periods in one biofilm life cycle.

Authors:  Ruixiang Ma; Xianli Hu; Xianzuo Zhang; Wenzhi Wang; Jiaxuan Sun; Zheng Su; Chen Zhu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.073

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.