Literature DB >> 3416776

Direct introduction of cloned DNA into the sea urchin zygote nucleus, and fate of injected DNA.

R R Franks1, B R Hough-Evans, R J Britten, E H Davidson.   

Abstract

A method is described for microinjection of cloned DNA into the zygote nucleus of Lytechinus variegatus. Eggs of this species are unusually transparent, facilitating visual monitoring of the injection process. The initial fate of injected DNA fragments appears similar to that observed earlier for exogenous DNA injected into unfertilized egg cytoplasm. Thus after end-to-end ligation, it is replicated after a lag of several hours to an extent indicating that it probably participates in most of the later rounds of DNA synthesis undergone by the host cell genomes during cleavage. The different consequences of nuclear versus cytoplasmic injection are evident at advanced larval stages. Larvae descendant from eggs in which exogenous DNA was injected into the nuclei are four times more likely (32% versus 8%) to retain this DNA in cell lineages that replicate very extensively during larval growth, i.e. the lineages contributing to the imaginal rudiment, and thus to display greatly enhanced contents of the exogenous DNA. Similarly, 36% of postmetamorphic juveniles from a nuclear injection sample retained the exogenous DNA sequences, compared to 12% of juveniles from a cytoplasmic injection sample. However, the number of copies of the exogenous DNA sequences retained per average genome in postmetamorphic juveniles was usually less than 0.1 (range 0.05-50), and genome blot hybridizations indicate that these sequences are organized as integrated, randomly oriented, end-to-end molecular concatenates. It follows that only a small fraction of the cells of the average juvenile usually retains the exogenous sequences. Thus, even when introduced by nuclear microinjection, the stable incorporation of exogenous DNA in the embryo occurs in a mosaic fashion, although in many recipients the DNA enters a wider range of cell lineages than is typical after cytoplasmic injection. Nuclear injection would probably be the route of choice for studies of exogenous DNA function in the postembryonic larval rudiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3416776     DOI: 10.1242/dev.102.2.287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  9 in total

1.  Functional cis-regulatory genomics for systems biology.

Authors:  Jongmin Nam; Ping Dong; Ryan Tarpine; Sorin Istrail; Eric H Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Transcription from plasmid expression vectors is increased up to 14-fold when plasmids are transfected as concatemers.

Authors:  P Leahy; G G Carmichael; E F Rossomando
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Structure of an ectodermally expressed sea urchin metallothionein gene and characterization of its metal-responsive region.

Authors:  P Harlow; E Watkins; R D Thornton; M Nemer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  High throughput microinjections of sea urchin zygotes.

Authors:  Nadezda A Stepicheva; Jia L Song
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  An in vivo titration of regulatory factors required for expression of a fusion gene in transgenic sea urchin embryos.

Authors:  D L Livant; A E Cutting; R J Britten; E H Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution of actin gene families of sea urchins.

Authors:  H Fang; B P Brandhorst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Early asymmetric cues triggering the dorsal/ventral gene regulatory network of the sea urchin embryo.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cavalieri; Giovanni Spinelli
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Barcoded DNA-tag reporters for multiplex cis-regulatory analysis.

Authors:  Jongmin Nam; Eric H Davidson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  3D-printed microwell arrays for Ciona microinjection and timelapse imaging.

Authors:  Clint Gregory; Michael Veeman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.