Literature DB >> 34167665

Neuroplasticity and non-invasive brain stimulation in the developing brain.

Igor D Bandeira1, Daniel H Lins-Silva2, Judah L Barouh2, Daniela Faria-Guimarães2, Ingrid Dorea-Bandeira3, Lucca S Souza2, Gustavo S Alves2, André R Brunoni4, Michael Nitsche5, Felipe Fregni6, Rita Lucena7.   

Abstract

The brain is a dynamic organ whose growth and organization varies according to each subject's life experiences. Through adaptations in gene expression and the release of neurotrophins and neurotransmitters, these experiences induce a process of cellular realignment and neural network reorganization, which consolidate what is called neuroplasticity. However, despite the brain's resilience and dynamism, neuroplasticity is maximized during the first years of life, when the developing brain is more sensitive to structural reorganization and the repair of damaged neurons. This review presents an overview of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that have increasingly been a focus for experimental research and the development of therapeutic methods involving neuroplasticity, especially Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Due to its safety risk profile and extensive tolerability, several trials have demonstrated the benefits of NIBS as a feasible experimental alternative for the treatment of brain and mind disorders in children and adolescents. However, little is known about the late impact of neuroplasticity-inducing tools on the developing brain, and there are concerns about aberrant plasticity. There are also ethical considerations when performing interventions in the pediatric population. This article will therefore review these aspects and also obstacles related to the premature application of NIBS, given the limited evidence available concerning the extent to which these methods interfere with the developing brain.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Children; NIBS; Neuroplasticity; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34167665     DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  5 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive neuromodulation for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Hailiang Huang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.830

2.  Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Dysphagia after Stroke.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Hailiang Huang; Yuqi Jia; Ying Yu; Zhiyao Liu; Xin Shi; Fangqi Wang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Hailiang Huang; Ying Yu; Yuqi Jia; Zhiyao Liu; Xin Shi; Fangqi Wang; Tingting Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Effects of a short and intensive transcranial direct current stimulation treatment in children and adolescents with developmental dyslexia: A crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrea Battisti; Giulia Lazzaro; Floriana Costanzo; Cristiana Varuzza; Serena Rossi; Stefano Vicari; Deny Menghini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Effects of robot-assisted task-oriented upper limb motor training on neuroplasticity in stroke patients with different degrees of motor dysfunction: A neuroimaging motor evaluation index.

Authors:  Hui Xie; Xin Li; Wenhao Huang; Jiahui Yin; Cailing Luo; Zengyong Li; Zulin Dou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.152

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.