| Literature DB >> 34167540 |
Huajie Zou1,2, Yongping Xu1,2, Zhelong Liu3,4, Xuefeng Yu5,6, Xiaoyu Meng1,2, Danpei Li1,2, Xi Chen1,2, Tingting Du1,2, Yan Yang1,2, Yong Chen1,2, Shiying Shao1,2, Gang Yuan1,2, Xinrong Zhou1,2, Shuhong Hu1,2, Wentao He1,2, Delin Ma1,2, Junhui Xie1,2, Benping Zhang1,2, Jianhua Zhang1,2, Wenjun Li7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ANGPTL8, an important regulator of lipid metabolism, was recently proven to have additional intracellular and receptor-mediated functions. This study aimed to investigate circulating levels of ANGPTL8 and its potential association with the risk of kidney function decline in a cohort study.Entities:
Keywords: 4C Study; ANGPTL8; Kidney function decline; eGFR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34167540 PMCID: PMC8223309 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-021-01317-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Clinical and biochemical parameters for participants, according to quartile of ANGPTL8 levels
| Characteristics | Q1 (187.78–287.78) | Q2 (359.06–436.95) | Q3 (517.94–605.04) | Q4 (751.47–1057.66) | All | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 577 | 579 | 578 | 577 | 2311 | |
| Age (years) | 58 (52–64) | 60 (53–67) | 63 (56–69) | 64 (58–71) | 62 (55–68) | < 0.001 |
| Male (%) | 135 (23.4) | 194 (33.5) | 240 (41.5) | 261 (45.2) | 830 (35.9) | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.77 (21.67–25.94) | 23.34 (21.47–26.14) | 23.23 (21.30–25.68) | 23.24 (21.17–25.64) | 23.43 (21.41–25.81) | 0.09 |
| WHR | 0.87 (0.83–0.90) | 0.87 (0.83–0.90) | 0.87 (0.83–0.90) | 0.88 (0.83–0.91) | 0.87 (0.83–0.90) | 0.33 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.70 (5.40–6.00) | 5.70 (5.40–6.00) | 5.70 (5.50–6.10) | 5.70 (5.40–6.20) | 5.70 (5.40–6.00) | 0.07 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.27 (4.92–5.74) | 5.22 (4.88–5.71) | 5.34 (4.93–6.02) | 5.38 (4.94–6.15) | 5.28 (4.92–5.91) | < 0.001 |
| 2 h PG (mmol/L) | 6.18 (5.19 -7.65) | 6.32 (5.23–7.68) | 6.50 (5.44–8.44) | 6.70 (5.55–9.12) | 6.43 (5.30–8.16) | < 0.001 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.48 (1.26–1.74) | 1.44 (1.25–1.70) | 1.47 (1.24–1.73) | 1.40 (1.17–1.69) | 1.45 (1.23–1.71) | 0.006 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.82 (2.30–3.37) | 2.77 (2.27–3.32) | 2.80 (2.26–3.33) | 2.79 (2.29–3.35) | 2.79 (2.28–3.34) | 0.88 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.22 (0.87–1.66) | 1.14 (0.81–1.65) | 1.08 (0.84–1.63) | 1.31 (0.88–1.92) | 1.19 (0.85–1.73) | < 0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.02 (4.35–5.59) | 4.94 (4.34–5.58) | 4.96 (4.38–5.64) | 5.04 (4.32–5.66) | 4.99 (4.35–5.62) | 0.64 |
| ALT (U/L) | 12 (9–17) | 12 (9–16) | 12 (10–17) | 14 (10–19) | 13 (10–17) | < 0.001 |
| AST (U/L) | 20 (17–24) | 21 (18–25) | 21 (18–26) | 23 (19–28) | 21 (18–26) | < 0.001 |
| Creatinine at baseline (μmol/L) | 58.50 (54.70–63.45) | 59.40 (55.00–64.60) | 60.60 (56.10–65.80) | 62.30 (56.85–68.30) | 60.30 (55.50–65.50) | < 0.001 |
| eGFR at baseline (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 99.77 (94.23–105.04) | 98.52 (93.35–104.31) | 96.72 (91.72–102.07) | 94.95 (89.45–100.35) | 97.36 (92.19–103.05) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension (%) | 300 (52.0) | 301 (52.0) | 330 (57.1) | 341 (59.1) | 1272 (55.0) | 0.03 |
| Hyperlipidaemia (%) | 213 (36.9) | 213 (36.8) | 211 (36.5) | 260 (45.1) | 897 (38.8) | 0.005 |
| DM (%) | 114 (19.8) | 102 (17.6) | 153 (26.5) | 172 (29.8) | 541 (23.4) | < 0.001 |
| CVD (%) | 27 (4.7) | 30 (5.2) | 19 (3.3) | 33 (5.7) | 109 (4.7) | 0.24 |
| Kidney function decline (%) | 16 (2.8) | 29 (5.0) | 25 (4.3) | 66 (11.4) | 136 (5.9) | < 0.001 |
| CKD stage | ||||||
| G1 (%) (eGFR≥ 90) | 382 (66.2) | 355 (61.3) | 332 (57.4) | 253 (43.8) | 1322 (57.2) | < 0.001 |
| G2 (%) (60 ≤ eGFR < 90) | 183 (31.7) | 201 (34.7) | 229 (39.6) | 274 (47.5) | 887 (38.4) | |
| G3 (%) (30 ≤ eGFR < 60) | 11 (1.9) | 22 ( 3.8) | 16 ( 2.8) | 47 ( 8.1) | 96 (4.2) | |
| G4 (%) (15 ≤ eGFR < 30) | 1 (0.2) | 1 ( 0.2) | 1 ( 0.2) | 2 (0.3) | 5 ( 0.2) | |
| G5 (%)(eGFR < 15) | 0 (0) | 0 ( 0) | 0 ( 0) | 1 ( 0.2) | 1 ( 0.04) | |
BMI body-mass index, WHR waist hip rate, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin A1c, FPG fasting plasma glucose, 2 h PG 2 h plasma glucose concentration, HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low density lipoprotein, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, eGFR glomerular filtration rate, DM diabetes mellitus, CVD cardiovascular diseases, CKD chronic kidney disease
Fig. 1Circulating ANGPTL8 levels in patients with and without kidney function decline during follow-up. The boxplot displays median and IQR
Relation between ANGPTL8 and kidney function decline, according to quartiles of ANGPTL8
| ANGPTL8 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | IPTW model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (Reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Q2 (HR, 95% CI) | 1.91 (1.04–3.51) | 1.86 (0.98–3.54) | 1.52 (0.79–2.94) | 1.72 (1.10–2.68) |
| Q3 (HR, 95% CI) | 1.74 (0.93–3.25) | 1.45 (0.74–2.85) | 1.43 (0.73–2.80) | 1.36 (0.86–2.14) |
| Q4 (HR, 95% CI) | 4.66 (2.70–8.05) | 3.99 (2.21–7.20) | 2.59 (1.41–4.77) | 1.73 (1.27–2.36) |
| Per-SD increase | 1.64 (1.45–1.85) | 1.55 (1.36–1.77) | 1.31 (1.13–1.51) | - |
Model 1 was unadjusted
Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex and BMI
Model 3 was adjusted for all variables in model 2 plus baseline eGFR, HDL, LDL, TC, TG, ALT, AST, history of diabetes, hypertension and CVD at baseline
HR hazards ratio, CI confidence intervals, IPTW inverse possibility of treatment weight, SD standard deviation
Fig. 2Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for kidney function decline. The solid lines indicate multivariate-adjusted HRs, and dotted lines indicate the 95% CIs derived from restricted cubic spline regression. A knot is located at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for ANGPTL8 levels. The Cox regression was adjusted for sex, age, BMI, FPG, 2 h PG, baseline eGFR, HDL, LDL, TC, TG, ALT, AST, and history of diabetes, hypertension and CVD at baseline
Fig. 3Stratified analyses of the HR of kidney function decline according to a 1-SD increase in ANGPTL8. The final model adjusted for age, sex, BMI, FPG, 2 h PG, HDL, LDL, TC, TG, ALT, AST, and history of diabetes, hypertension and CVD at baseline, except the strata variable