| Literature DB >> 34167451 |
Guofang Ye1, Lvhao Zhang1, Xiang Zhou1.
Abstract
Virulence attenuation frequently occurs in in vitro culturing of pathogenic microbes. In this study, we investigated the total putative long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in an aphid-obligate pathogen, Conidiobolus obscurus, and screened the differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs and protein-coding genes involved in the virulence decline. The virulence was significantly attenuated after eight subculturing events, in which the median lethal concentration of the conidia ejected from mycelial mats relative to the bamboo aphid, Takecallis taiwanus, increased from 36.1 to 126.1 conidia mm-2, four days after inoculation. In total, 1,252 lncRNAs were identified based on the genome-wide transcriptional analysis. By characterizing their molecular structures and expression patterns, we found that the lncRNAs possessed shorter transcripts, lower expression, and fewer exons than did protein-coding genes in C. obscurus. A total of 410 DE genes of 329 protein-coding genes and 81 lncRNAs were identified. The functional enrichment analysis showed the DE genes were enriched in peptidase activity, protein folding, autophagy, and metabolism. Moreover, target prediction analysis of the 81 lncRNAs revealed 3,111 cis-regulated and 23 trans-regulated mRNAs, while 121 DE lncRNA-mRNA pairs were possibly involved in virulence decline. Moreover, the DE lncRNA-regulated target genes mainly encoded small heat shock proteins, secretory proteins, transporters, autophagy proteins, and other stress response-related proteins. This implies that the decline in virulence regulated by lncRNAs was likely associated with the environmental stress response of C. obscurus. Hence, these findings can provide insights into the lncRNA molecules of Entomophthoromycotina, with regards to virulence regulators of entomopathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Mycopathogen; entomophthorales; fungal aging; fungal virulence; long noncoding RNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34167451 PMCID: PMC8237998 DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1938806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virulence ISSN: 2150-5594 Impact factor: 5.882
Figure 1.Time-concentration-mortality trends of Takecallis taiwanus nymphs after exposure to the shower of Conidiobolus obscurus conidia ejected from the mycelial mat formulation. The bamboo aphid cohorts were separately inoculated with different conidial concentrations of C. obscurus from the 1st (a and d), 4th (b and e), and 8th (c and f) subcultures. (a–c) The corrected mortality at different conidial concentrations over observation days. Symbols: mean concentrations (conidia mm–2), to each of which three cohorts of aphids (with the total number given in parentheses) were separately exposed. Error bars reflect standard deviation. (d–f) The estimates of the median lethal concentration (LC50) (bold solid curve) are associated with 95% confidence limits (dash curves) over four days after conidial inoculation
Figure 2.Prediction and characteristics of the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in Conidiobolus obscurus. (a) Number of lncRNAs across different categories: intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs), which are located between annotated protein-coding genes; antisense lncRNAs which are transcribed from the antisense strand; intronic lncRNAs, which overlap with the introns of annotated coding genes in either a sense or an antisense orientation; sense lncRNAs, which considered transcript variant of protein-coding mRNAs, as they overlap with a known annotated gene on the same genomic strand. (b) Expression levels of lncRNAs and the protein-coding genes in all the fungal subcultures, FPKM: fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads. (c) Transcript lengths of the protein-coding genes and lncRNAs. (d) Number of exons per transcript of the protein-coding genes and the lncRNAs
The statistics of the putative lncRNA regulating mRNAs
| LncRNAs | LncRNA-mRNA pairs | Average pairs | Pair range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1252 | 58,944 | 47 | 2 ~ 88 | |
| 346 | 867 | 2.5 | 1 ~ 18 | |
| 1252 | 59,444 | 47.5 | 1 ~ 88 |
One lncRNA with one of its target genes was named as one pair. Average pairs: mean number of mRNAs regulated by each lncRNA; Pair range: the minimal and maximal number of mRNAs putatively regulated by each lncRNA.
Figure 3.Overview of the Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation of the differentially expressed protein-coding genes between the 1st and 8th subcultures. GO functional enrichment in the subcategories of biological process (a), cellular component (b), and molecular function (c). protein interactive network in the subcategories of biological process (d), cellular component (e), and molecular function (f). in A-C, the q-value is represented by the color of the point. the smaller the q-value, the closer the color is to red, and the more significant the enrichment, considering FDR≤ 0.05 as the threshold. In D-F, red: the protein-coding genes are upregulated (fold change ≥2), green: downregulated (fold change ≤-2). size of dots is related to the gene number
Figure 4.The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of potential lncRNA-regulated protein-coding genes. KEGG functional enrichment (a): “Rich factor” refers to the ratio of the number of transcripts in the pathway entry for the differentially expressed transcripts to the total number of transcripts in the pathway entry. The larger the Rich factor, the higher the degree of enrichment. The Q-value indicates the P-value after multiple hypothesis test corrections ranging from 0 to 1; the closer it is to 0, the more significant the enrichment. Protein interactive network (b): red dots indicate upregulation (fold-change ≥2); green dots indicate downregulation (fold-change ≤0.5). Size of dots is related to the gene number
Functional annotation of the main differentially expressed (DE) protein-coding genes that are cis-regulated by DE long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in terms of fold change (FC)
| DE protein-coding genes | Pfam annotation | DE lncRNAs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal ID | Log2(FC) | Internal ID | Log2(FC) | |
| EVM0007115 | 2.09 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.12808.1 | 1.81 |
| MSTRG.12801.2 | −1.03 | |||
| EVM0000723 | 1.81 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.12808.1 | 1.81 |
| MSTRG.12801.2 | −1.03 | |||
| EVM0008944 | 1.65 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.5294.1 | 1.56 |
| MSTRG.5307.5 | 2.53 | |||
| MSTRG.5307.7 | −1.16 | |||
| MSTRG.5269.3 | −2.08 | |||
| EVM0004881 | 1.62 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.9187.1 | 1.82 |
| EVM0001986 | 1.59 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.12808.1 | 1.81 |
| MSTRG.12801.2 | −1.03 | |||
| EVM0009984 | 1.59 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.11196.3 | −1.28 |
| EVM0004909 | 1.51 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.11196.3 | −1.28 |
| EVM0008368 | 1.48 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.12808.1 | 1.81 |
| MSTRG.12801.2 | −1.03 | |||
| EVM0004943 | 1.44 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.9187.1 | 1.82 |
| EVM0007322 | 1.33 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.11196.3 | −1.28 |
| EVM0004757 | 1.28 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.9187.1 | 1.82 |
| EVM0009126 | 1.44 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family | MSTRG.5294.1 | 1.56 |
| MSTRG.5307.5 | 2.53 | |||
| MSTRG.5307.7 | −1.16 | |||
| EVM0008702 | 1.14 | Hsp70 protein; MreB/Mbl protein | MSTRG.12823.2 | −1.91 |
| EVM0000047 | 1.04 | Hsp70 protein; MreB/Mbl protein | MSTRG.1788.17 | 1.61 |
| EVM0005653 | 1.47 | OPT oligopeptide transporter protein | MSTRG.8578.1 | −1.49 |
| EVM0006467 | 1.35 | Sugar (and other) transporter; Major Facilitator Superfamily | MSTRG.9490.1 | 2.58 |
| EVM0005090 | 1.21 | IucA/IucC family; Ferric iron reductase FhuF-like transporter | MSTRG.12808.1 | 1.81 |
| MSTRG.12801.2 | −1.03 | |||
| EVM0008819 | 1.17 | IucA/IucC family; Ferric iron reductase FhuF-like transporter | MSTRG.5294.1 | 1.56 |
| MSTRG.5307.5 | 2.53 | |||
| MSTRG.5307.7 | −1.16 | |||
| EVM0002578 | 1.18 | Major Facilitator Superfamily; Sugar (and other) transporter | MSTRG.1685.1 | 2.22 |
| EVM0004118 | 1.06 | MFS/sugar transport protein | MSTRG.1685.1 | 2.22 |
| EVM0005734 | −1.99 | Na+/H+ antiporter family | MSTRG.3953.1 | −1.00 |
| MSTRG.3986.1 | −1.87 | |||
| EVM0001395 | −1.47 | EamA-like transporter family | MSTRG.4662.2 | 2.10 |
| EVM0009886 | −1.40 | Ion channel regulatory protein UNC-93 | MSTRG.4206.2 | 1.57 |
| EVM0005010 | 1.23 | Glycosyl hydrolases family 18 | MSTRG.4662.2 | 2.10 |
| EVM0005565 | 1.21 | Lipase (class 3) | MSTRG.8052.1 | −1.69 |
| EVM0006208 | 1.15 | Cysteine-rich secretory protein family | MSTRG.5294.1 | 1.56 |
| MSTRG.5307.5 | 2.53 | |||
| MSTRG.5307.7 | −1.16 | |||
| MSTRG.5269.3 | −2.08 | |||
| EVM0001776 | −1.03 | Common central domain of tyrosinase | MSTRG.12808.1 | 1.81 |
| MSTRG.12801.2 | −1.03 | |||
| EVM0001976 | −1.01 | Calcineurin-like phosphoesterase | MSTRG.5161.1 | −1.22 |
| EVM0008429 | −1.16 | Common central domain of tyrosinase | MSTRG.4778.2 | −1.32 |
| MSTRG.4777.2 | −1.65 | |||
| EVM0008099 | −1.41 | Cerato-platanin | MSTRG.4206.2 | 1.57 |
| EVM0003330 | −1.52 | Serine carboxypeptidase S28 | MSTRG.8578.1 | −1.49 |
| EVM0008232 | 1.23 | Cys/Met metabolism PLP-dependent enzyme | MSTRG.8803.1 | 1.15 |
| EVM0004178 | 1.34 | Fatty acid desaturase | MSTRG.657.4 | −1.20 |
| MSTRG.752.1 | −1.45 | |||
| MSTRG.707.1 | −1.47 | |||
| EVM0002856 | −1.07 | Galactose oxidase, central domain | MSTRG.8052.1 | −1.69 |
| EVM0007871 | −1.08 | Aminotransferase class I and II | MSTRG.7571.8 | 3.75 |
| EVM0007931 | −1.49 | Prolyl oligopeptidase family | MSTRG.4778.2 | −1.32 |
| EVM0008156 | −1.51 | Trypsin | MSTRG.15264.2 | −1.29 |
| EVM0003166 | −1.59 | Trypsin | MSTRG.10341.2 | −1.80 |
| EVM0007722 | 1.15 | UDP-glucoronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase | MSTRG.7749.2 | 1.13 |
| EVM0010159 | 1.13 | Cytochrome P450 | MSTRG.5021.2 | 1.89 |
| EVM0003943 | 1.05 | Ubiquitin-like autophagy protein Apg12; Autophagy protein Atg8 | MSTRG.10639.2 | 2.08 |
| EVM0008913 | −1.26 | Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase | MSTRG.13861.1 | −1.27 |
| EVM0007347 | −2.03 | Glutathione S-transferase | MSTRG.1566.1 | −2.25 |
| EVM0002155 | −1.32 | G protein-coupled glucose receptor regulating Gpa2 | MSTRG.3953.1 | −1.00 |
| MSTRG.3986.1 | −1.87 | |||
| EVM0005107 | −2.69 | Vacuolar import and degradation protein | MSTRG.5021.2 | 1.89 |
* Secretory proteins were screened based on their structures using the signal peptide that was predicted by SignalP v5.0 (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/signalp) and without a membrane spanning domain. Pfam – protein family database [24]
Figure 5.Phylogenetic tree for the 30 small heat shock proteins (HSP20s) of Conidiobolus obscurus based on the maximum likelihood method. The MEGAX software suite was used to infer the evolutionary histories. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured according to the number of substitutions per site. The 12 HSP-encoding genes were putatively upregulated by the differentially expressed lncRNAs (listed behind the HSP-encoding gene ID). The rest of the HSP20s were not differentially expressed between subcultures. Another two upregulated HSP70s (EVM0008702 and EVM0000047) were used as an outgroup
Figure 6.Validation of the differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs by RT-qPCR. Four pairs of lncRNA-mRNAs among the 1st, 4th, and 8th subcultures of Conidiobolus obscurus were tested. Fold changes of relative expression levels (the 1st subculture as control) were calculated based on the analysis of real-time quantitative PCR. Error bars: SEM from three biological replicates. Different lowercase letters marked on the bars indicate significant differences (Fisher’s LSD, P < 0.05). The details of the specific primers used in this study are listed in Table S1