BACKGROUND: Meatpacking is dirty, dangerous, and demanding work. In the United States, the industry predominately employs people from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds and immigrants, with 45% of the workforce identifying as Hispanic/Latino. Little is known about how the work environment affects worker engagement in health-promoting activities; however, occupational health professionals are uniquely positioned to advance worker health, safety, and general well-being. METHODS: Hispanic/Latino meatpacking workers with work-related musculoskeletal pain and active health concerns were recruited to participate in a study to explore health, health behaviors, and the work environment. Five focus groups (N = 28) were conducted in Nebraska between March 2019 and February 2020. Thematic analysis using the Health Belief Model constructs was used to explain workers' health behaviors including utilization of occupational health services at their workplace. FINDINGS: Workers believed that there was little they could do to prevent and treat health problems. They understood the perceived threat of health problems and the benefits of self-care, but the perceived barriers often outweighed the benefits. The workplace had few prompts to motivate or incentivize self-care both in and outside of work. In addition, workers did not trust the occupational health office and saw few benefits to accessing services. Together, these conditions resulted in low self-efficacy and limited engagement in health-promoting behaviors. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Occupational health professionals should promote Total Worker Health and foster trust by providing culturally, linguistically, and literacy appropriate services and by identifying opportunities and reducing barriers for workers to engage in activities to promote their health, safety, and well-being.
BACKGROUND: Meatpacking is dirty, dangerous, and demanding work. In the United States, the industry predominately employs people from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds and immigrants, with 45% of the workforce identifying as Hispanic/Latino. Little is known about how the work environment affects worker engagement in health-promoting activities; however, occupational health professionals are uniquely positioned to advance worker health, safety, and general well-being. METHODS: Hispanic/Latino meatpacking workers with work-related musculoskeletal pain and active health concerns were recruited to participate in a study to explore health, health behaviors, and the work environment. Five focus groups (N = 28) were conducted in Nebraska between March 2019 and February 2020. Thematic analysis using the Health Belief Model constructs was used to explain workers' health behaviors including utilization of occupational health services at their workplace. FINDINGS: Workers believed that there was little they could do to prevent and treat health problems. They understood the perceived threat of health problems and the benefits of self-care, but the perceived barriers often outweighed the benefits. The workplace had few prompts to motivate or incentivize self-care both in and outside of work. In addition, workers did not trust the occupational health office and saw few benefits to accessing services. Together, these conditions resulted in low self-efficacy and limited engagement in health-promoting behaviors. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Occupational health professionals should promote Total Worker Health and foster trust by providing culturally, linguistically, and literacy appropriate services and by identifying opportunities and reducing barriers for workers to engage in activities to promote their health, safety, and well-being.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health Belief Model; Hispanic/Latino; Total Worker Health; meat processing; meatpacking; occupational health
Authors: Kelly K Dineen; Abigail Lowe; Nancy E Kass; Lisa M Lee; Matthew K Wynia; Teck Chuan Voo; Seema Mohapatra; Rachel Lookadoo; Athena K Ramos; Jocelyn J Herstein; Sara Donovan; James V Lawler; John J Lowe; Shelly Schwedhelm; Nneka O Sederstrom Journal: J Bioeth Inq Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: David Høyrup Christiansen; Kent Jacob Nielsen; Dorte Raaby Andersen; Johan Hviid Andersen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Sydney A Smith; Jennifer W Talton; Sara A Quandt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.614