First Dose mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Allergic Reactions: Limited Role for Excipient Skin Testing.

BACKGROUND: CDC states that a severe or immediate allergic reaction to the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is a contraindication for the second dose.
OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes associated with excipient skin testing after a reported allergic reaction to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose one.
METHODS: We identified a consecutive sample of patients with reported allergic reactions after the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine who underwent allergy assessment with skin testing to polyethylene glycol (PEG) and, if appropriate, polysorbate 80. Skin testing results in conjunction with clinical phenotyping of the first dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reaction guided second dose vaccination recommendation. Second dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions were assessed.
RESULTS: 80 patients with reported first dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine allergic reactions (n=65, 81% immediate onset) underwent excipient skin testing. 14 (18%) had positive skin tests to PEG (n=5) and/or polysorbate 80 (n=12). Skin testing result did not impact tolerance of second dose in patients with immediate or delayed reactions. Of 70 (88%) patients who received their second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose, 62 (89%) had either no reaction or a mild reaction managed with antihistamines, but two patients required epinephrine. Three patients with positive PEG-3350 intradermal (methylprednisolone) testing tolerated second dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Refresh Tears caused non-specific irritation.
CONCLUSION: Most individuals with a reported allergic reaction to dose one of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, regardless of skin test result, received the second dose safely. More data are needed on the value of skin prick testing to PEG (Miralax) in evaluating patients with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine anaphylaxis. Refresh Tears should not be used for skin testing.

An expert-informed risk stratification protocol was recommended to guide clinical care after mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions. However, at the time, no supportive evidence was available.

Most individuals after first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions, regardless of excipient skin testing result, were able to receive the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose safely. Refresh Tears were irritating and should not be used for skin testing to polysorbate 80.

More data are needed on the value of skin prick testing to PEG in evaluating patients with mRNA COVID vaccine anaphylaxis, and the positive predictive value remains unknown. Most patients may be able to proceed to second vaccination without skin testing.

Introduction

One year after the World Health Organization declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic, more than 138 million people have been infected and every country in the world has been affected. With excitement and hope, millions of Americans welcomed the approval of 2 novel COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in December 2020. However, almost immediately after the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, initial reports of anaphylaxis and allergic reactions began. When the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was approved soon thereafter, similar reports emerged. The reports of anaphylaxis prompted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to develop formal guidance for administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, stating that patients with a history of anaphylaxis to vaccine components should not receive mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, and patients with a history of an immediate allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine should not receive the second dose.

In December 2020, national anaphylaxis rates were initially reported by the CDC to be as high as 11.1 per million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, but by January 2021, CDC estimates reported an anaphylaxis incidence of 2.5 to 4.7 per million doses of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. In the first prospective real-world cohort of 60,000 employees vaccinated at a large health care system (Mass General Brigham [MGB]), an incidence of 2.5 cases of anaphylaxis per 10,000 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered was reported. The cause of allergic reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines remains unknown, but the excipient polyethylene glycol (PEG)-2000, which is present in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, has been an important focus of investigation with recent limited supportive evidence. Furthermore, the utility of skin testing to PEG (MiraLAX, Bayer, Boca Raton, FL) and polysorbate 80 was unclear, but experts suspected excipient skin testing to have a high positive predictive value and a low negative predictive value (NPV). , At the time of publication, 3 COVID-19 vaccines have received Food and Drug Administration EUA: 2 contain PEG-2000 (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines) and 1 contains polysorbate 80 (Janssen adenovirus vector vaccine). Thus, it is important to understand whether there is a relationship between allergy to these excipients and allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines.

Our risk stratification algorithm uses clinical history with skin testing to PEG and/or polysorbate to evaluate higher-risk individuals who report a history of an immediate allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Here, we report the outcomes of individuals referred for reported allergic reactions to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, who completed skin testing and followed our initial published skin testing guidance. We review patient and reaction characteristics with skin testing findings along with second-dose vaccine outcomes, which motivate an updated approach to individuals who present after a reported allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods

This cohort included consecutive patients referred for an in-person allergy/immunology excipient skin testing visit, which occurred at MGB between January 6 and March 3, 2021 after a first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reaction. In-person visits occurred after initial allergy/immunology telemedicine visits with clinical phenotyping and risk stratification. All included patients received the first mRNA vaccine dose at an MGB vaccination clinic; second doses were scheduled at the vaccination clinics associated with the MGB academic medical centers: Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) or Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH).

We recommended excipient skin testing to all patients who reported symptoms concerning an IgE-mediated allergy within 4 hours of vaccination. Patients with symptoms consistent with an allergic reaction that was delayed (occurring more than 4 hours after vaccination but before day 3 after vaccination) may also have proceeded to excipient skin testing, especially if the symptoms were more severe or the patient preferred skin testing after using shared decision-making. For patients who reported symptoms that were potentially IgE-mediated but subjective (eg, globus sensation or itch without rash), the decision to proceed to skin testing was also based on shared decision-making considering patient preferences. Interested and eligible patients were referred for an in-person excipient skin testing appointment at either MGH or BWH. Approximately 14% of patients with first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions were referred for in-person excipient skin testing using our algorithm.

At MGH, PEG skin testing was performed using MiraLAX, a laxative containing PEG-3350, epicutaneous and methylprednisolone acetate (containing PEG-3350 only), intradermally (ID) (see Table E1 in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). If methylprednisolone acetate was positive, methylprednisolone sodium succinate was used as a control to exclude methylprednisolone as the cause of allergy. At MGH, for individuals with first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions, skin testing to polysorbate 80 (using triamcinolone acetonide) was performed if PEG skin testing was positive, to guide future COVID-19 vaccination or if the patient reported a history of a reaction to another vaccine containing polysorbate 80. At BWH, PEG (MiraLAX and methylprednisolone acetate containing PEG 3350 only) skin testing was similar, although polysorbate 80 testing used Refresh Tears (Allergan, Madison, NJ) and was performed regardless of the PEG skin testing result. Both sites required adequate positive (histamine) and negative (saline) controls for epicutaneous and ID tests. Patients with negative skin testing were advised to proceed to second-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Shared decision-making was used for patients with positive skin test to PEG and/or polysorbate 80.

Table E1

Skin testing protocols used to test for PEG and polysorbate 80 allergy

Drug	Skin prick testing (mg/mL)	Intradermal (mg/mL)
PEG3350
MiraLAX	1.7
	17
	170
Methylprednisolone acetate∗	40	0.44
Control
Methylprednisolone sodium succinate	40	0.44
Polysorbate 80
Triamcinolone acetonide	40	0.4440
Refresh Tears	1:1	1:10

PEG, polyethylene glycol.

Refresh Tears, which contains polysorbate 80 0.5%, was subsequently found to be irritating. Triamcinolone acetonide contains polysorbate 80 0.04%.

Some brands of methylprednisolone acetate contain polysorbate and PEG3350 whereas others have only PEG3350; use methylprednisolone acetate containing PEG3350 only.

We used excipient skin testing alone (without mRNA COVID-19 vaccine skin testing, which has been described elsewhere , ) because we did not have access at the time to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for skin testing purposes and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were the first vaccines of their kind. It was not apparent that prior vaccine guidance could be accurately applied to these vaccines and there was initial concern regarding stability for its use as a skin testing product or as a graded challenge.

Owing to concerns that arose during this study regarding irritant skin testing reactions to Refresh Tears, control skin tests were performed on 25 nonallergic subjects who reported clinical tolerance to polysorbate 80.

Data collection and definitions

Clinical data were gathered from manual electronic health record review by trained research assistants (A.E.M. and A.S.C.) with allergist oversight (A.R.W., L.B.R., and L.L.). Structured MGB allergist note templates used during clinic visits facilitated accurate demographic, medical, and allergy history; skin test results; and outcomes. Study data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture tools. ,

Immediate allergic reactions were defined as occurring within the first 4 hours; delayed allergic reactions occurred anytime thereafter. Reaction details were categorized by organ system of involvement. Cutaneous included itching, rash, hives, flushing, and swelling. Cardiovascular included hypotension and tachycardia. Lower respiratory included cough, wheezing, chest tightness, or shortness of breath. Upper airway included globus, hoarseness, and throat swelling. Gastrointestinal included abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

For patients who received the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, we assessed tolerance of the vaccine using 3 days of electronically disseminated symptoms surveys. If patients did not respond to all 3 days of the survey, or if they reported allergic symptoms on the survey, they were contacted by phone or e-mail message by an allergist/immunologist (A.R.W.) to assess tolerance of the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Individuals who received the Janssen vaccine in lieu of second mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were considered not to have received the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose but to have been completely vaccinated.

The index allergic reaction to the first mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and, when relevant, the allergic reaction to the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, were graded using Ring and Messmer criteria (see Table E2 in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org) by 2 allergists independently. In the case of discordant grading, a third allergist was used to determine the final grade (A.R.W., L.B.R., and L.L.). We defined second-dose tolerance as either no allergic reaction or a grade 0 reaction with mild subjective symptoms that did not require treatment.

Table E2

Ring and Messmer grading for allergic reactions

Grade 1: Cutaneous signs

Urticaria

Angioedema

Generalized erythema

Grade 2: Measurable but not life-threatening symptoms

Cutaneous signs

Hypotension (defined as a decrease of more than 30% in blood pressure with tachycardia)

Cough

Difficulty with mechanical ventilation

Grade 3: Life-threatening symptoms

Cardiovascular collapse

Tachycardia or bradycardia (due not include mild sinus tachycardia)

Arrhythmias

Severe bronchospasm

Grade 4: Death

Cardiac arrest

Respiratory arrest

This study was approved by the MGB Partners Institutional Review Board, Protocol No. 2020P004068.

Data analysis

Data are presented as counts with frequencies for categorical data and means with SDs or medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables, as indicated. All analyses were performed in SAS software (version 9.4, Cary, NC). We calculated the NPV for PEG skin testing result and having a reaction with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose 2 for the entire sample and considering only patients with immediate reactions.

Results

Eighty patients underwent excipient skin testing at MGB after a reported allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Table I ). Of those, 62 (77%) reported a reaction to the Moderna and 18 (23%) to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. In total, 38,933 Moderna vaccines (60%) and 25,906 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines (40%) were administered at MGB during the study period and 576 allergy/immunology telehealth visits were performed for COVID-19 vaccine reactions.

Table I

Characteristics of patients who completed skin testing

Characteristic	All (n = 80)	Immediate allergic reaction∗ (n = 65)	Delayed allergic reaction† (n = 15)
Demographics
Age, y (mean [SD])	40.9 (±13.6)	42.4 (±12.4)	34.5 (±16.6)
Female sex, n (%)	71 (89)	57 (88)	14 (93)
Race, n (%)
White	62 (78)	51 (79)	11 (73)
Asian	7 (9)	5 (8)	2 (13)
Black	4 (5)	3 (5)	1 (7)
Other	7 (9)	6 (9)	1 (7)
History of atopy, n (%)	56 (70)	45 (69)	11 (73)
Food allergy	29 (36)	24 (37)	5 (33)
Asthma	25 (31)	19 (29)	6 (40)
History of anaphylaxis	22 (28)	17 (26)‡	5 (33)§
Allergic rhinitis	20 (25)	15 (23)	5 (33)
History of polysorbate allergy	5 (6)	3 (5)	2 (13)
Atopic dermatitis	4 (5)	3 (5)	1 (7)
History of polyethylene glycol allergy	2 (3)	2 (3)	0
Reaction history, n (%)‖
Cutaneous symptoms¶	65 (81)	51 (78)	14 (93)
Lower respiratory symptoms#	18 (23)	14 (22)	4 (27)
Cardiovascular symptoms∗∗	11 (14)	10 (15)	1 (7)
Gastrointestinal symptoms††	9 (11)	7 (11)	2 (13)
Upper airway symptoms‡‡	6 (8)	6 (9)	0
Other symptoms	51 (64)	21 (32)§§	1 (7)‖‖
Management of allergic reaction, n (%)
Antihistamines	54 (68)	47 (72)	7 (47)
Corticosteroids	12 (15)	11 (17)	1 (7)
Intramuscular epinephrine	6 (8)	6 (9)	0
Emergency room visit	19 (24)	18 (28)	1 (7)
Allergic reaction to (n [%]):
Dose 1 (Moderna)	62 (78)	48 (74)	14 (93)
Dose 1 (Pfizer)	18 (23)	17 (26)	1 (7)
Ring and Messmer17 criteria, n (%)
Grade 0	22 (28)	21 (32)	1 (7)
Grade 1	46 (58)	33 (51)	13 (87)
Grade 2	12 (15)	11 (17)	1 (7)
Positive skin test results, n (%)	14 (18)	8 (12)	6 (40)
MiraLAX 1:100 (SPT)	1 (1)	1 (2)	0
MiraLAX 1:10 (SPT)	0	0	0
MiraLAX 1:1 (SPT)	0	0	0
Depo-Medrol 0.4 mg/mL (IDT)	3 (4)	2 (3)	1 (7)
Depo-Medrol 4 mg/mL (IDT)	1 (1)	1 (2)	0
Refresh eye drops 1:1 (SPT)	0	0	0
Refresh eye drops 1:100 (IDT)	10 (13)	5 (8)	5 (33)
Refresh eye drops 1:10 (IDT)	2 (3)	1 (2)	1 (7)

IDT, intradermal test; SPT, skin prick test.

All patients were referred for skin testing owing to symptoms suggestive of an IgE reaction.

Immediate was defined as 4 or fewer hours; 47 reactions (72%) were within 1 h (median, 10 min; interquartile range, 5-15 minutes).

Delayed was defined as more than 4 h; 11 reactions (73%) were within 24 h.

Culprit was a medication: 9 (14%); food: 6 (9%); and venom: 2 (3%).

Culprit was a medication: 3 (20%); and food: 2 (13%).

Patients may have more than 1 symptom.

Hives, rash, itching, swelling (not throat), and flushing.

Wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and cough.

Tachycardia and hypotension.

Gastrointestinal upset, diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea.

Throat swelling, hoarseness, and globus.

Tingling (n = 14; 22%), lightheadedness (n = 4; 6%), chest pain (n = 1; 2%), feeling hot (n = 1; 2%), syncope (n = 1; 2%), and red eye (n = 1; 2%). Patients may have more than 1 symptom.

Sneezing (n = 1; 7%) and tingling (n = 1; 7%).

Patient characteristics

Patients were predominantly female (89%) and White (78%), mean age 40.9 ± 13.6 years. Medical history included a history of nonanaphylactic IgE-mediated food allergy (n = 29; 36%); asthma (n = 25; 31%); anaphylaxis to medications, foods, venom, or latex (n = 22; 28%); allergic rhinitis (n = 20; 25%); polysorbate allergy (n = 5; 6%); atopic dermatitis (n = 4; 5%); and PEG allergy (n = 2; 3%) (Table I).

Reaction characteristics

A total of 65 patients reported an immediate reaction (81%); 40 occurred within the first 30 minutes (62%). Median onset of symptoms was within 10 minutes (interquartile range, 5-15 minutes). Reported symptoms were cutaneous (n = 51; 78%), lower respiratory (n = 14; 22%), cardiovascular (n = 10; 15%), and subjective, including lightheadedness and tingling (n = 21; 32%). Moreover, 47 patients received antihistamine treatment (72%) and 6 received epinephrine (9%); 18 were treated in the emergency department (28%). Of the 65 immediate allergic reactions, 21 were grade 0 (32%), 33 were grade 1 (51%), and 11 were grade 2 (17%). All individuals recovered from the reaction without long-term sequalae.

There were 15 patients who experienced delayed allergic reactions (19%): 14 patients received Moderna (93%) and 1 patient received Pfizer (7%) (Table I). Of these, 11 had symptoms within the first 24 hours after receiving the vaccine (73%) and 4 had symptoms starting 24 hours or more after the vaccine was administered (27%). Delayed symptoms were most frequently cutaneous (n = 14; 93%); other symptoms are listed in Table I. One patient was treated in the emergency department.

Skin testing results

Of the 80 patients who underwent excipient skin testing, 33 had testing to PEG only; 47 had testing to PEG and polysorbate 80 (n = 41 to Refresh Tears and n = 6 to triamcinolone acetonide). In all, 14 had a positive skin test result (18%) (Table II ): PEG only (n = 2), PEG and polysorbate 80 (n = 3), and polysorbate 80 only (n = 9) (Figure 1 , A). All polysorbate 80-positive individuals were positive on skin testing to Refresh Tears (n = 12), which was found to be an irritant in 13 of 25 (52%) nonallergic controls (see Table E3 in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). Among the 65 patients presenting with an immediate allergic reaction, 8 had positive skin tests (12%): PEG (n = 2), PEG and polysorbate 80 (n = 2), and polysorbate 80 (n = 4) (Figure 1, B). Patients with PEG-positive skin tests were positive on ID testing to methylprednisolone acetate 4 mg/mL (n = 1), methylprednisolone acetate 0.4 mg/mL (n = 2), and MiraLAX 1:100 epicutaneous (n = 1). Among the 15 patients with a delayed allergic reaction, 6 had positive skin testing (40%): 5 to polysorbate 80 (33%) and 1 to both PEG (ID testing to methylprednisolone acetate 0.4 mg/mL) and polysorbate 80 (Figure 1, C) (7%). No allergic or adverse events occurred during any skin testing procedures.

Table II

Patients with positive skin testing results

Timing of reaction	Age, y	Sex	History		Dose 1 Reaction						Skin test results	Dose 2 outcome
			Allergies or allergic reaction	History of anaphylaxis	Vaccine	Onset of symptoms (h)	Signs and symptoms	Treatment	Treatment setting/disposition	Ring and Messmer grade
Immediate (<4-h) reaction	46	F	Hymenoptera venom	Yes (Hymenoptera venom)	Moderna	0.16	Dizziness, nausea, difficulty swallowing, swelling of eyes and tongue, hives	Diphenhydramine	Home	1	Methylprednisolone acetate IDT 4 mg/mL (10 ×14 mm)Refresh IDT 1:10 (9 × 21 mm)	Tolerated Janssen
	40	F	None	No	Pfizer	0.16	Flushing, tachycardia, tongue itching, swelling of fingers, vomiting, diarrhea	Diphenhydramine, intravenous fluids, intramuscular epinephrine, methylprednisolone succinate, ondansetron.	Emergency department	1	MiraLAX skin prick test 1:100 (6 × 25 mm)	Recommended not to receive dose 2
	26	F	Ginger	No	Moderna	0.25	Wheezing	No treatment needed	Home	2	Methylprednisolone acetate IDT 0.4 mg/mL (16 × 44 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
	56	F	Omalizumab, cefaclor, sulfonamide antibiotics, tree nuts, shellfish, latex	No	Moderna	0.3	Stinging in eyes, tingling of tongue and lips, mild itching	Cetirizine, famotidine	Home	0	Refresh IDT 1:100 (8 × 11 mm)	Pretreated with cetirizine 10 mg and prednisone 20 mg. At 5 min after receiving dose 2 (Moderna), patient experienced pruritus. Treated with cetirizine 20 mg
	49	F	None	No	Moderna	1	Flushing, hives, itching	Fexofenadine	Home	1	Refresh IDT (5 × 15 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
	26	F	Environmental	No	Moderna	3	Wheezing, chest tightness, dry cough	Albuterol	Home	2	Methylprednisolone acetate IDT 0.4 mg/mL (10 × 20 mm)Refresh IDT 1:100 (8 × 18 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
	54	M	None	No	Moderna	3	Itching, lip swelling	No treatment needed	Home	1	Refresh IDT 1:100 (9 × 21 mm)	4-6 h after receiving dose 2 (Moderna), patient experienced lip swelling, which self-resolved
	42	F	Penicillin, hymenoptera venom	No	Moderna	4	Hives	No treatment needed	Home	1	Refresh IDT 1:100 (6 × 24 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
Delayed (>4-h) reaction	28	F	None	No	Moderna	10-12	Itching, hives	No treatment needed	Home	1	Refresh IDT 1:100 (4 × 12 mm)	Awaiting vaccination
	29	F	Penicillin	No	Moderna	12-16	Palpitations, diarrhea, delayed hives	Loperamide	Home	0	Refresh IDT 1:100 (7 × 18 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
	33	F	None	No	Moderna	12-24	Diffuse hives	Diphenhydramine	Home	1	Refresh IDT 1:100 (10 × 40 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
	24	F	Environmental	No	Moderna	18-24	Wheezing, chest tightness, hives, itching	Diphenhydramine, topical hydrocortisone	Home	1	Methylprednisolone acetate IDT 0.4 mg/mL (9 × 22 mm)Refresh IDT 1:100 (13 × 32 mm)	Tolerated Moderna
	49	F	None	No	Pfizer	20	Tongue swelling, sneezing, nasal congestion, itchy eyes, chest congestion, cough, swelling of fingers	Diphenhydramine, Acetaminophen, pseudoephedrine	Home	1	Refresh IDT 1:100 (12 × 20 mm)	Patient preference not to receive dose 2
	19	F	Peanut, tree nuts	Yes (peanut, tree nuts)	Moderna	48	Hives, throat closing	Diphenhydramine	Home	1	Refresh IDT 1:10 (11 × 17 mm)	Pretreated with cetirizine 10 mg and prednisone 20 mg. At 20 min after receiving dose 2 (Moderna), patient experienced dizziness, numbness in legs and fingers, and warm feeling in throat. Treated with cetirizine 10 mg

IDT, intradermal test.

Clinical characteristics, details of the first dose reaction, skin testing result, and details of the second dose for patients with positive skin testing results are provided.

Figure 1

Patients who were skin tested owing to symptoms after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination that were concerning for an allergic reaction. (A) All patients. (B) Patients with immediate allergic reactions. (C) Patients with delayed allergic reactions. ∗Three patients who had positive skin testing to both polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polysorbate are represented in the PEG category only for the purpose of illustration. †One patient did not receive the next dose in the series and instead received Janssen. ‡Two patients had grade 0 reactions and 1 had a grade 1 reaction. §Three patients had a grade 0 reaction, 9 had a grade 1 reaction, and 3 had a grade 2 reaction. ‖Two patients who had positive skin testing to both PEG and polysorbate are represented in the PEG category only for the purpose of illustration. ¶One patient did not receive the next dose in the series and instead received Janssen. #One patient had a grade 0 reaction and 1 had a grade 1 reaction. ∗∗Two patients had a grade 0 reaction, 8 patients had a grade 1 reaction, and 3 had a grade 2 reaction. ††One patient who had positive skin testing to both PEG and polysorbate is represented in the PEG category only for the purpose of illustration. ‡‡One patient had a grade 0 reaction. §§One patient had a grade 0 reaction and 1 had a grade 1 reaction.

Table E3

Refresh Tears skin testing results on nonallergic, clinically tolerant controls, reflecting a high frequency of false-positive, irritant reactions

Patient	Refresh Tears 1:100 (intradermal), mm (wheal flare)	Refresh Tears 1:10 (intradermal), mm (wheal ×flare)
1	10 × 20	—
2	0	7 × 15
3	0	8 × 18
4	0	0
5	8 × 18	—
6	9 × 14	—
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0
10	0	0
11	8 × 13	—
12	0	0
13	9 × 20	—
14	0	7 × 18
15	0	0
16	0	—
17	0	—
18	0	6 × 24
19	0	0
20	0	0
21	0	0
22	8 × 18	—
23	7 × 8	—
24	0	4 × 8
25	5 × 10	—
Total	8 (32%)	5 (20%)

Among 25 nonallergic controls, there were 13 positive reactions (52%) to Refresh Tears on intradermal testing, with 8 positive at the 1:100 concentration (32%) and 5 positive at the 1:10 concentration (20%).

Overall tolerance of second dose of vaccine

Of the 80 patients who underwent excipient skin testing, 70 (88%) received a second dose of the same mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and 52 (74%) tolerated the second dose vaccine without a reaction (Figure 1, A). The NPV of a negative skin test to PEG predicted a 75% likelihood of tolerating the second dose of the vaccine.

Among the 65 patients who reported an immediate allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, 58 (89%) received the second dose of the vaccine and 43 (74%) tolerated the second dose without a reaction (Figure 1, B); 2 (3%) received epinephrine treatment for the second-dose reaction. Among the 65 patients who reported an immediate reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, the NPV of a negative skin test to PEG was 75%.

Tolerance of second dose of vaccine among skin test-negative patients

Overall, 66 patients (83%) were skin test-negative and 60 (91%) of those patients went on to receive the second dose of the vaccine; 45 (75%) ultimately had the second dose of the vaccine without recurrent symptoms. Among the 65 patients who reported an immediate allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID vaccine, 57 (88%) were skin test-negative; 52 (80%) received their second dose of the vaccine and 39 (75%) had no symptoms with the second dose. Thirteen patients (25%) were skin test-negative but reacted to the second dose of the vaccine; the most common symptoms were cutaneous (n = 12), but 4 (31%) patients were seen in the emergency department and 2 (15%) received epinephrine (Table III ).

Table III

Patients with negative skin testing results but reporting reaction to second dose

Timing of reaction	Age, y	Sex	Allergies or allergic reaction	Vaccine	Dose 1 reaction				Dose 2 reaction
					Onset of symptoms (h)	Signs and symptoms	Treatment and treatment setting	Grade∗	Onset of symptoms (h)	Signs and symptoms	Treatment and treatment setting	Grade∗
Immediate (<4-h) reaction	29	F	Cefuroxime, sulfonamide antibiotics, clindamycin, iodinated contrast media, ketoconazole, moxifloxacin, nystatin	Moderna	0	Dizziness, fatigue, hives	Levocetirizine and diphenhydramine at home	1	0.2	Hives	Diphenhydramine at vaccine clinic and cetirizine, famotidine, and prednisone at home	1
	62	F	Sulfonamide antibiotics, latex, loratadine, morphine	Moderna	0.1	Lip tingling, dizziness, eye and facial swelling	No treatment was sought	1	0.5	Itching of ear, eye swelling	Diphenhydramine at vaccine clinic and prednisone at home	1
	56	M	None	Pfizer	0.1	Tongue tingling, lower lip swelling, mild throat clearing	Epinephrine, diphenhydramine, solumedrol at emergency department	1	0.1	Lower lip swelling	Cetirizine at home	1
	47	F	Latex, tramadol, amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, fluconazole	Moderna	0.1	Itching, lip tingling, subjective lip and tongue swelling, hive-like rash	Diphenhydramine at vaccine clinic and loratadine and cetirizine at home	1	12	Eye swelling and itching	Loteprednol and cetirizine at home	1
	56	F	Shrimp, nitrofurantoin, ibuprofen, sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim	Moderna	0.1	Generalized itching, throat itchiness, fatigue	Diphenhydramine at emergency department and albuterol at home	0	0.2	Itching, headache, throat tightness and itching, warmth, flushing	Diphenhydramine at emergency department	0
	57	F	None	Moderna	0.1	Headache, throat tightness, fatigue, hypertension, redness on legs, joint and muscle aches, shakes	Ibuprofen and unspecified antihistamine at home	0	12-24	Itching, rash, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, fatigue, fever, cough, muscle aches, and joint pain	Acetaminophen and diphenhydramine at home	1
	46	F	Pepper, procaine	Moderna	0.2	Tingling of left arm, roof of mouth, and tongue, numbness.	Cetirizine at emergency department	0	0	Numbness, chest tightness, dry heaving, chills, hot sensation in lips	Diphenhydramine, ondansetron, and methylprednisolone at emergency department	0
	24	F	Amoxicillin, clindamycin, pineapple, benzonatate	Moderna	0.25	Globus and throat itching, cough, erythematous oropharynx, hoarse voice	Epinephrine, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, and diphenhydramine at emergency department	2	0.6	Throat tightness and itching, cough, erythematous posterior pharynx, watery eyes	Cetirizine, albuterol, and epinephrine at vaccine clinic and methylprednisolone sodium succinate, diphenhydramine, and famotidine at emergency department	2
	29	F	Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, penicillin	Pfizer	0.3	Hives, cough, hoarseness	Epinephrine, prednisone, and cetirizine at emergency department	2	0.3	Itching, rash, hives, throat tightness, cough	Epinephrine, cetirizine, and albuterol at emergency department	2
	58	F	Ciprofloxacin, cephalexin, macrolide antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, omeprazole, penicillin, theophylline, codeine	Moderna	0.5	Lip tingling, eye, lip, facial, and leg swelling, throat tightness	No treatment was sought	1	12	Lip tingling, lip swelling, sensation of facial swelling	Unspecified antihistamine at home	1
	59	F	Succinylcholine, midazolam, promethazine, gabapentin, fentanyl, prochlorperazine, cefazolin	Pfizer	1.25	Sensation of throat closing, dysphagia, shortness of breath, itching of palms, soles, and torso	Diphenhydramine at vaccine clinic	0	0.3	Face, neck, and chest flushing, itching over palms and feet, lip fullness and tingling	Diphenhydramine at vaccine clinic	1
	43	F	Ibuprofen, penicillin	Pfizer	2	Lip swelling, full body itching, facial swelling, headache	Acetaminophen at home	1	0.75	Tongue numbness, hive-like rash, wheezing	No treatment was sought	2
	43	F	None	Moderna	2-3	Itchy rash on right arm, red and itchy right eye	No treatment was sought	1	0.1	Chest flushing	No treatment was sought	1
Delayed (>4-h) reaction	37	F	Cephalosporins, penicillin, shellfish, latex, hymenoptera venom, influenza vaccine	Moderna	8.5	Hives, eye and lip swelling	Diphenhydramine and loratadine at home	1	0.25	Arm and neck itching, arm erythema	Cetirizine in vaccine clinic	0
	62	F	Iodine, shellfish	Moderna	10	Hives, nausea, diarrhea	Unspecified anti-itch cream at home	1	Unknown	Throat, tongue, and eye swelling, itching of chest and face, nausea, headache, lethargy	No treatment was sought	1

Clinical characteristics and details of the first and second dose reactions for patients with negative skin testing results, who developed a reaction to dose 2, are provided.

Ring and Messmer grade.

Among the 15 individuals who reported a delayed reaction after the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, 9 (60%) were skin test negative and 8 (89%) received the second vaccine dose; 6 of 8 (75%) tolerated the second dose without a reaction. Two patients were skin test-negative but reacted to the second dose of the vaccine: 1 had mild swelling of the throat, tongue, and eyes, and pruritus without rash on the face and chest. No treatment was sought. The other patient had pruritus and erythema of the arms, with pruritus of the lips and neck, treated with antihistamines.

Tolerance of second dose of vaccine among skin test-positive patients

Among the 8 patients (12%) who reported a history of an immediate allergic reaction and a positive skin test, 4 (67%) tolerated the vaccine (skin test-positive to polysorbate 80/Refresh Tears [n = 2], ID PEG/methylprednisolone acetate [n = 1], ID PEG/methylprednisolone acetate and polysorbate 80/Refresh Tears [n = 1]), 2 (33%) had mild allergic reactions, and 2 (25%) opted to not receive the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose after shared decision-making (both were skin test-positive to PEG; 1 patient was skin prick-positive to MiraLAX and 1 opted instead to receive the Janssen vaccine) (Table II). The 2 patients with reactions to the second dose were positive to Refresh Tears, and both had mild symptoms. The 2 patients who were PEG skin test-positive but tolerated the vaccine were positive to methylprednisolone acetate on intradermal testing. The only patient with a positive reaction to MiraLAX on epicutaneous testing had experienced anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine after the first dose of the vaccine and was not rechallenged.

Among the 15 patients who reported a delayed allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, 6 had a positive skin test, 3 tolerated the vaccine (the skin test was positive to polysorbate 80/Refresh Tears [n = 2], and ID PEG/methylprednisolone acetate and polysorbate 80/Refresh Tears [n = 1]), 1 had a mild allergic reaction, and 2 did not receive the second dose (the skin test was positive to polysorbate 80/Refresh Tears). The patient who had a reaction to the second dose was positive to polysorbate 80/Refresh Tears and experienced subjective symptoms (Table II). The patient with positive skin testing to PEG was positive only on ID testing to methylprednisolone acetate.

Discussion

Among 80 individuals referred for excipient skin testing after a reported allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, the vast majority of patients received the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose safely irrespective of skin test results. Two patients who were treated with epinephrine after the second dose had been treated with epinephrine after the first dose. However, 3 patients who received epinephrine after the first dose tolerated the second vaccine dose. Therefore, although there are no clear risk factors, this is an important issue for physicians to discuss with patients who were treated with epinephrine after the first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Notably, it is possible that epinephrine was not necessary in these cases. Overall, excipient skin testing did not add value to the clinical risk assessment in those reporting first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions, even when applied to this highly selected group that represented just 14% of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactions evaluated by MGB allergy/immunology overall in this period. However, PEG skin prick testing may be useful in guiding second-dose vaccination in individuals with anaphylaxis to the first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, although its positive predictive value remains unknown.

Based on our data and experience to date, we propose an updated risk stratification algorithm after reported first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine allergic reactions (Figure 2 ). First, the clinical history remains the most important aspect in the allergist evaluation. Using shared decision-making, most individuals with reactions to the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine can proceed safely with the second dose.22, 23, 24 Second, excipient skin testing is favored over vaccine skin testing, , because the vaccine is largely inaccessible to most allergists and the mRNA vaccines are still under EUA. Third, in terms of premedication, although some patients in the cohort were pretreated with antihistamines or steroids, this study was not designed to determine an optimal premedication regimen. The authors have used premedication with nonsedating antihistamines for patients with mild symptoms such as delayed urticaria but have tried to restrict the use of glucocorticoids that may have an unfavorable immunologic effect. Fourth, in our experience to date, PEG skin testing was of limited utility (n = 5 with positive skin tests) and should be considered only in specific cases (eg, patients with a convincing history of anaphylaxis to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine or recently to oral PEG-containing medications). Finally, methylprednisolone acetate or PEG ID skin testing did not provide additional information to guide the safety of second-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, because in our experience, patients with positive skin testing to this tolerated the vaccine (n = 3). We thus suggest that when PEG excipient testing is warranted, epicutaneous testing to MiraLAX (PEG3350) alone is adequate.10, 11, 12 In our experience, consistent with rare true cases of anaphylaxis to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, MiraLAX skin testing was positive in 1 patient who had symptoms consistent with anaphylaxis. This patient did not receive a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine, so the positive predictive value of MiraLAX skin testing remains unknown , (see Figure E1 in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org).

Figure 2

Management of patients who present with symptoms concerning for an allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Use of Janssen vaccine (if available) may be appropriate after allergic reaction to the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine if allergy evaluation is not feasible or owing to shared decision-making between the patient and physician. PEG, polyethylene glycol. ∗Same COVID-19 vaccine manufactured as first dose. †Limited supply of Janssen COVID vaccine; only use when clinically necessary.

Figure E1

Skin testing protocol for polyethylene glycol (PEG) using MiraLAX for epicutaneous testing without PEG intradermal testing and PEG and polysorbate 80.

The cause of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine allergic reactions remains unclear and may be multifactorial, but 1 case report linked PEG as a possible allergen. An improved understanding of the role of excipient skin testing to PEG in individuals with a history of anaphylaxis to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is still needed. Although we were able to calculate the NPV for PEG skin testing and tolerance with the second dose, we were unable to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and/or positive predictive value. Two patients reported histories of being allergic to PEG (reported after the first-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reaction). Interestingly, both were PEG skin test-negative and 1 patient tolerated the second dose without symptoms; the other patient developed subjective globus sensation after the second dose, which was treated with antihistamines only. Three patients positive on intradermal PEG (methylprednisolone acetate) skin testing tolerated the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose with no reactions. In addition, in our experience, a portion of skin test-negative patients had reactions to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine second dose. Although most had easily treatable reactions and are now fully vaccinated, importantly, 2 were treated with epinephrine and 4 were treated in the emergency department, which emphasizes the important role of an allergist in the care of these patients. Thus, because skin test-positive patients tolerated the second dose of the vaccine and skin test-negative patients had reactions, skin testing did not add information regarding the tolerance of the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose.

Owing to the high rate of skin test positivity to Refresh Tears, which was used as a source of polysorbate 80 in the BWH study population, we tested a new control group (Table E3). Approximately half of the nonallergic controls had positive skin test results, which suggests that Refresh Tears likely causes an irritant, or false-positive, skin test reaction. These findings prompted us to modify our initial algorithmic approach and to contact all MGB patients with positive skin tests to Refresh Tears to modify our initial advice and encourage mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. No patients with positive skin tests to Refresh Tears who received the second dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine developed an allergic reaction, but 3 patients had subjective symptoms treated with antihistamines only.

Vaccine hesitancy is an important issue that may be exacerbated by adverse and/or allergic symptoms after the first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We are eager to reassure patients regarding the vaccine’s safety to encourage vaccination. In this cohort of 80 high-risk individuals referred for skin testing, 10 of 80 have not received the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, although only 2 were advised by allergists not to receive mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (a third patient received Janssen vaccine). The reasons for incomplete vaccination are unclear but may include vaccine administration logistics, unclear benefit of second-dose vaccination, and/or concern about having a recurrent allergic or adverse reaction. , The allergist may not be able to address all of these barriers, but the allergist can acknowledge them and, based on these data, provide reassurance regarding receiving the second dose if the clinical history is low-risk. , , , The allergist also has an important role in helping to recognize and treat allergic reactions correctly, so allergist-observed second-dose vaccinations may reassure patients.

Recently, the CDC added guidance allowing Janssen COVID-19 vaccine at least 28 days after an allergic reaction to a first dose of mRNA COVID vaccine, broadening patients’ options. The Janssen COVID-19 vaccine contains the excipient polysorbate 80 but not PEG; therefore, it could be administered without skin testing to PEG in patients concerned about PEG allergy. Janssen COVID-19 vaccine could also be considered in an individual with a history of PEG allergy or PEG skin test positivity but a negative polysorbate 80 skin test or tolerance of vaccine with polysorbate 80 (Figure 2). Reassuringly, to date, the rate of allergic reactions to the Janssen vaccine appears exceedingly low. One patient in this cohort who had reported an immediate allergic reaction to Moderna, and then had positive skin testing to methylprednisolone acetate and Refresh Tears, subsequently tolerated the Janssen vaccine. This is an important option for high-risk patients with possible PEG allergy.

Limitations of our study include generalizability because our study population was a referred population consisting of MGB patients evaluated by a specialist. Most of these patients were White females, which was likely a reflection of the overrepresentation of White females in the health care worker population in the Boston area. The demographics may limit generalizability across demographics, although they closely match those reported nationally. , , These data are subject to information bias because we do not know why some individuals chose not to receive the second dose of the vaccine, even when the allergist advised that it was safe to proceed. Because proceeding to a second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose was not done at random, we acknowledge that there is a bias in calculating a NPV. However, although NPV could be calculated, given that only 9% of skin test-negative patients did not receive the second dose, we were unable to calculate PPV because 40% of skin test-positive patients did not receive the second dose and the sample size was just 5. Another limitation is that symptoms were self-reported. Although we intended to use excipient skin testing only in high-risk individuals, some individuals reported minor and subjective symptoms (eg, itch, globus, dizziness). Including these symptoms in our analysis might have made it more difficult to ascertain the association of excipient skin testing with true mRNA COVID-19 vaccine allergy. However, the inclusion of these patients was due to patient preference and shared decision-making.

Overall, our initially published risk stratification protocol allowed safe second-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for the vast majority of individuals despite a reported first-dose allergic reaction. We have since learned that excipient skin testing may be of little utility in assessing these reactions, particularly in individuals without anaphylaxis. More data are needed to identify whether PEG skin prick testing after a reaction clinically consistent with severe anaphylaxis to mRNA COVID vaccine is predictive of a reaction with subsequent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Additional studies focusing on specific reaction phenotypes, notably anaphylaxis, may enable us to better risk stratify and optimize recommendations for subsequent COVID-19 vaccination after immediate allergic reactions. As experiences accumulate, similar to the revised algorithm included in this study, we will update our clinical approach to provide up-to-date guidance for individuals with a presumed reaction to the first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.