Literature DB >> 34166008

No evidence for loss aversion disappearance and reversal in Walasek and Stewart (2015).

Quentin André1, Bart de Langhe2.   

Abstract

Loss aversion-the idea that losses loom larger than equivalent gains-is one of the most important ideas in Behavioral Economics. In an influential article published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Walasek and Stewart (2015) test an implication of decision by sampling theory: Loss aversion can disappear, and even reverse, depending on the distribution of gains and losses people have encountered. In this article, we show that the pattern of results reported in Walasek and Stewart (2015) should not be taken as evidence that loss aversion can disappear and reverse, or that decision by sampling is the origin of loss aversion. It emerges because the estimates of loss aversion are computed on different lotteries in different conditions. In other words, the experimental paradigm violates measurement invariance, and is invalid. We show that analyzing only the subset of lotteries that are common across conditions eliminates the pattern of results. We note that other recently published articles use similar experimental designs, and we discuss general implications for empirical examinations of utility functions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34166008     DOI: 10.1037/xge0001052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  1 in total

1.  Acceptance of mixed gambles is sensitive to the range of gains and losses experienced, and estimates of lambda (λ) are not a reliable measure of loss aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2020).

Authors:  Lukasz Walasek; Timothy L Mullett; Neil Stewart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.