Literature DB >> 34165609

Vitreoscilla massiliensis sp. nov., Isolated From the Stool of an Amazonian Patient.

Sokhna Ndongo1,2, Mossaab Maaloum1,3,4, Magali Richez1, Rachid Saile4, Pierre-Edouard Fournier1,3, Jean Christophe Lagier1,2, Didier Raoult1,2, Saber Khelaifia5,6.   

Abstract

Strain SN6T is a non-motile and non-spore-forming gram-negative bacterium which was isolated from the stool sample of an Amazonian patient. The optimum growth was observed at 37 °C, pH 7, and 0-5 g/l of NaCl. Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, the strain SN6T exhibited 97.5% identity with Vitreoscilla stercoraria strain ATCC_15218 (L06174), the phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature. The predominant fatty acid was hexadecenoic acid (31%). The genomic DNA G + C content of the strain SN6T was 49.4 mol %. After analysis of taxonogenomic data, phenotypic and biochemical characteristics, we concluded that strain SN6T represents a new species of the genus Vitreoscilla for which the name Vitreoscilla massiliensis sp.nov is proposed. The type strain is SN6T (=CSUR P2036 = LN870312 = DSM 100958).
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34165609      PMCID: PMC8289809          DOI: 10.1007/s00284-021-02577-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


Introduction

This strain was isolated from the stool specimen of an obese Amazonian patient as part of the culturomics study [1] to search for microaerophilic bacteria from human gut. The genus Vitreoscilla was first described by Pringsheim in 1951, after having proposed the family Vitreoscillaceae in 1949. In 1986, Strohl et al. proposed three new species with validated names (Vitreoscilla stercoraria, Vitreoscilla beggiatoides and Vitreoscilla filiformis) of this genus [2]. In 2013, through the use of new-generation sequencing tools, the genus Vitreoscilla was placed in the Neisseriaceae family on the basis of its branching in the 16S rRNA gene tree [3]. Within its clade, members of the genus were the only ones capable of evolving in different habitats. Since the use of the culturomic concept, the repertoire of bacteria isolated from the human digestive microbiota [4] has expanded considerably. The characterization of these new species is based on a ribosomal RNA sequencing coupled with a taxonogenomics description, a strategy combining a comparison of genomic analysis and phenotypic characteristics, including the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) spectrum. In the present study, we used this approach to facilitate the identification and the description of this novel species named Vitreoscilla massiliensis sp.nov.

Materials and Methods

Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T was isolated by cultivation on 5% sheep blood agar under microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h and the strain could not be identified by Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. (MALDI-TOF MS). The bacterial spectrum obtained was incremented in our database and its comparison with those of BioTyper database spectra and our own collection did not allow for its identification. Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene of the strain SN6T showed a nucleotide sequence similarity of 97.5% with V. stercoraria strain (ATCC 15218) and V. stercoraria strain Göttingen 1488-6 (NR_025894.1), the phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree showing the position of Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbors. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic inferences are obtained with kimura two-parameter models using the maximum-likelihood method within the MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 1,000 times to generate majority consensus tree. Scale bar indicates 1% nucleotide sequence divergence. The scale bar represents 500 nm

Phylogenetic tree showing the position of Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T relative to other phylogenetically close neighbors. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic inferences are obtained with kimura two-parameter models using the maximum-likelihood method within the MEGA software. Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 1,000 times to generate majority consensus tree. Scale bar indicates 1% nucleotide sequence divergence. The scale bar represents 500 nm

Optimal Growth

Growth at various temperatures (28 °C, 37 °C, 42 °C, 45 °C) in different atmospheres (aerobic, microaerophilic using CampyGen from Thermo Scientific and anaerobic using AnaeroGenTM from bioMérieux) was tested by culture on Columbia agar (bioMérieux) after 48 h of incubation. The salinity acceptance limit of SN6T strain was investigated by culture on a home-made culture medium consisting of a Columbia agar culture medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) modified by adding (per liter) 5 g MgCl2 6H2O, 5 g MgSO4 7H2O, 2 g KCl, 1 g CaCl2 2H2O; 0.5 g NaBr, 0.5 g NaHCO3, and 2 g glucose with various NaCl concentrations 0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 75 g/L. The pH range (6; 6.5; 7; 8.5) for growth was also determined and pH was adjusted by addition of HCl or NaOH.

Biochemical and Chemotaxonomic Analysis

The abilities of the strain SN6T to use various substrates as sole carbon sources were evaluated using the API 20NE and API 50CH (bioMérieux) and the presence of some enzyme activities using APIZYM following the manufacturer’s instructions. All tests were performed in duplicate. Susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disk (i2a, Montpellier, France) diffusion method [5] on Mueller–Hinton agar in a Petri dish (BioMerieux) after 48 h of incubation at 37 °C under aerobic conditions. The interpretation of inhibition diameters to the manual measurement using a ruler was done using a Sirscan system© (i2a, Montpellier, France) according to the criteria proposed by the Comité de l’Antibiogramme of the French Society for Microbiology [6]. Cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis was performed by GC/MS. Two samples were prepared with approximately 65 mg of bacterial biomass per tube harvested from several culture plates. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared as previously described by Sasser [7]. GC/MS analyses were carried out as previously described by Dione et al. [8]. Briefly, fatty acid methyl esters were separated using an Elite 5-MS column and monitored by mass spectrometry (Clarus 500—SQ 8 S, Perkin Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France). Spectral database search was performed using MS Search 2.0 operated with the Standard Reference Database 1A (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) and the FAMEs mass spectral database (Wiley, Chichester, UK).

Genome Sequencing and Assembly

DNA of strain SN6T was extracted on the EZ1 biorobot (Qiagen) with a EZ1 DNA tissues kit after pretreatment by a lysozyme incubation at 37 °C, as previously described [9]. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high-sensitivity kit (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and sequenced on the MiSeq Technology (IlluminaInc, San Diego, CA, USA) with the mate pair strategy, as previously described [9]. The gDNA was barcoded in order to be mixed with 11 other projects with the Nextera Mate Pair sample prep kit (Illumina). The assembly of the genome was carried out with the help of a pipeline that allowed the creation of an assembly with different softwares (Velvet [10], Spades [11] and Soap Denovo [12], on trimmed (MiSeq and Trimmomatic [13] softwares) or untrimmed data (only MiSeq software). For each of the six assemblies performed, GapCloser [12] was used to reduce gaps. Then, contamination with Phage Phix was identified (blastn against Phage Phix174 DNA sequence) and eliminated. Finally, scaffolds whose size was less than 800 bp were removed and scaffolds whose depth value was lower than 25% of the mean depth were removed (identified as possible contaminants). The best assembly was selected using different criteria (number of scaffolds, N50 and number of N). Spades gave the best assembly of this strain, with a depth coverage of 98.

Genome Annotation and Comparison

We used Prodigal as predicting tool of open reading frames (ORFs) [14] with default parameters. The predicted ORFs were excluded if they spanned a sequencing gap region (contained N). Using BLASTP, predicted bacterial protein sequences were blasted against GenBank and clusters of orthologous groups (COG) databases, DNA G + C content was identified by The RAST Server [15], and the tRNAs and rRNAs were predicted using the tRNAScan-SE [16] and RNAmmer tools [17], respectively. SignalP was used for Signal peptides prediction [18], the number of transmembrane helices was predicted using TMHMM [19], ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05. Artemis [20] and DNA Plotter [21] were used for data management and visualization of genomic features, respectively. The Average Nucleotide identity at the genome level between V. massiliensis SN6 CZPV00000000.1, V. stercoraria ATCC_15218 (ARNN00000000.1), V. filiformis ATCC_43190 ( CP022423.1), Gulbenkiania mobilis E4FC31 (LIVN00000000.1), Chitinilyticum litopenaei DSM_21440 (ATZJ00000000.1), Chitinilyticum aquatile c14 (AUMS00000000.1), Chitinibacter tainanensis BCRC_17254 (AUCN00000000.1), and Snodgrassella alvi wkB2_wkB2 (CP007446.1) was estimated using Orthologous Average nucleotide identity tool (OAT) [22].

Results and Discussion

Based on the sequence similarity threshold values of the 16S rRNA gene that delineate a new species according to the recommendations of Stackebrandt and Ebers [23], the strain SN6T can, therefore, be classified as a new species of the genus Vitreoscilla and was accordingly named V. massiliensis SN6T [24].

Biochemical and Chemotaxonomic Analyses

API ZYM tests show positive reactions for esterase, esterase lipase, leucine arylamidase, acid phophatase, and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase. In API 50CH, no substrate fermentation was observed and in API 20NE assimilation of substrates was observed for L-arginine dihydrolase and potassium gluconate. Some phenotypic characteristics of SN6T with those of closely related species are presented in Table 1. The most abundant fatty acid is hexadecenoic acid (31%). Several hydroxyl fatty acids such as C12:0 3-OH (4.5 ± 1.0) and C14:0 3-OH (2.9 ± 0.1) are described. Other fatty acids such as 9-Hexadecenoic acid (22.0 ± 0.5), Dodecanoic acid (10.2 ± 0.6), 2-hexyl-cyclopropaneoctanoic acid (8.8 ± 0.4), Octadecenoic acid (8.0 ± 0.2), Pentadecanoic acid (5.5 ± 0.2), Tetradecanoic acid (3.3 ± 0.3), and Heptadecanoic acid (1.1 ± 0.1) were detected. The strain SN6T was resistant to Oxacillin and Metronidazole, but susceptible to other antibiotics tested.
Table 1

Differential characteristics of Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T, Vitreoscilla stercoraria ATCC 15218, Vitreoscilla filiformis ATCC 15551, Vitreoscilla beggiatoides B23SS, Gulbenkiania mobilis E4FC31, Chitinibacter tainanensis BCRC 17254, Chitinilyticum litopenaei DSM _21440_c1, and Snodgrassella alvi wkB2 wkB2

PropertiesV.massiliensisV. stercorariaaV.filiformisbV.beggiatoidescG. mobilisdC.litopenaeieC.tainanensisfS. alvig
Cell diameter (µm)0.51.01.0–1.52.5–30.2–0.40.3–0.50.5–0.90.4
Oxygen requirementAerobic/MicroaerophilicAerobicAerobic/MicroaerophilicAerobic/MicroaerophilicAerobicAerobic/AnaerobicAerobicMicroarophilic
Motility +  +  +  +  +  + -
Endospore formationNaNaNaNaNa
pH7–7.57.5–7.77.57.55.5–9.07–115.5–96.0–6.5
NaCl % (w/v)0–0.5Na00.51.00–0.75NaNa
IndoleNaNaNa

Production of

Alkaline phosphatase

NaNaNaNa + NaNa
Catalase +  +  +  + 
Oxidase +  +  +  + 
Nitrate reductase +  +  +  + 
UreaseNaNaNa + 
β-galactosidaseNaNaNa
N-acetyl-glucosamineNaNaNa +  + Na

Acid from

L-Arabinose

 + 
Trehalose + Na
D-mannose +  + 
Mannitol + 
D-glucose +  +  + 
D-fructose + 
Maltose +  + 
D-lactoseNaNa
D-raffinoseNaNaNa
HabitatHuman gutDung of CowFreshwater sedimentsSandy sedimentsWastewaterFreshwater pondSoilGut of Bees

Na not available

aData from Mayfield et al. [25]

b, cData from Strohl et al. [2]

dData from Vaz-Moreira et al. [26]

eData from Chang et al. [27]

fData from Chern et al. [28]

gData from Kwong et al. [29]

Differential characteristics of Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T, Vitreoscilla stercoraria ATCC 15218, Vitreoscilla filiformis ATCC 15551, Vitreoscilla beggiatoides B23SS, Gulbenkiania mobilis E4FC31, Chitinibacter tainanensis BCRC 17254, Chitinilyticum litopenaei DSM _21440_c1, and Snodgrassella alvi wkB2 wkB2 Production of Alkaline phosphatase Acid from L-Arabinose Na not available aData from Mayfield et al. [25] b, cData from Strohl et al. [2] dData from Vaz-Moreira et al. [26] eData from Chang et al. [27] fData from Chern et al. [28] gData from Kwong et al. [29]

Genome Properties

The genome is 3,716,289 bp long with 49.4% GC content (Fig. 2, Table 2). It is composed of 10 scaffolds (composed of 13 contigs). Of the 3 716 predicted genes, 3 627 were protein-coding genes and 89 were RNAs (5 genes are 5S rRNA, 5 genes are 16S rRNA, 5 genes are 23S rRNA and 74 genes are TRNA genes). A total of 2,263 genes (62.3%) were assigned with putative function (by cogs or by NR blast). 475 genes were identified as ORFans (13.1%). The remaining genes were described as hypothetical proteins (744 genes ≥ 20.5%). A summary of the distribution of V. massiliensis genes into the different COGs categories is presented in Table 3.
Fig. 2

Graphical circular map of the genome of Vitreoscilla massiliensis strain SN6T from outside to the center: genes on the forward strand colored by COG categories (only genes assigned to COG), genes on the reverse strand colored by COG categories (only gene assigned to COG), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), GC content, and GC skew (Color figure online)

Table 2

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

AttributeGenome (total)
Value% of totala
Size (bp)3,716,289100
G+C content (%)1,836,06349.42
Coding region (bp)3,249,93787.45
Total genes3,716100
RNA genes892.39
Protein-coding genes3,627100
Genes with function prediction2,26362.39
Genes assigned to COGs2,18460.21
Genes with peptide signals67718.66
Genes with transmembrane helices77421.33
Genes associated to virulence71519.71
ORFn genes47513.09
Genes associated with PKS or NRPS200.55
Genes associated to toxine/antitoxine1153.17

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 3

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

CodeValue% of totalDescription
[J]2135.872622Translation
[A]10.027570996Rna processing and modification
[K]1213.3360906Transcription
[L]882.4262476Replication, recombination and repair
[B]40.110283986Chromatin structure and dynamics
[D]320.8822719Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
[Y]00Nuclear structure
[V]441.2131238Defense mechanisms
[T]852.3435347Signal transduction mechanisms
[M]1403.8599393Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
[N]290.7995589Cell motility
[Z]00Cytoskeleton
[W]190.52384895Extracellular structures
[U]270.7444169Intracellular trafficking and secretion
[O]972.6743865Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
[X]772.1229665Mobilome, prophages, transposons
[C]1774.8800664Energy production and conversion
[G]1253.4463744Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
[E]2877.9128757Amino acid transport and metabolism
[F]641.7645438Nucleotide transport and metabolism
[H]1193.2809484Coenzyme transport and metabolism
[I]1333.6669421Lipid transport and metabolism
[P]1363.7496552Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
[Q]902.4813895Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
[R]2346.4516125General function prediction only
[S]1453.9977942Function unknown
_144339.784946Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome of Vitreoscilla massiliensis strain SN6T from outside to the center: genes on the forward strand colored by COG categories (only genes assigned to COG), genes on the reverse strand colored by COG categories (only gene assigned to COG), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), GC content, and GC skew (Color figure online) Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Genome Comparison

The draft genome sequence and the G + C content of V. massiliensis (3.71 MB and 49.4%) is larger than that of V. stercoraria (2.58 MB and 43.9% respectively). Also, the gene content of V. massiliensis is larger than that of (3,627and 2,440 respectively). The distribution of genes into COG categories was similar in all 7 compared genomes (Fig. 3). All genomes were compared with V. massiliensis using Orthologous average nucleotide identity. The OrthoANI analysis showed that identity nucleotide value is 76.4% with V. stercoraria which is lower than 95% (Fig. 4). Likewise, we obtained similar results for the analysis of the digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) with 31.60% between V. massiliensis and V. stercoraria (Table 4).
Fig. 3

Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins

Fig.4

Heatmap generated with OrthoANI values calculated using the OAT software between Vitreoscilla species and other closely related species with standing in nomenclature

Table 4

Pairwise comparison of Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T with other species using GGDC, formula 2(DNA-DNA hybridization estimates based on identities/HSP length)

C.tainanensisC.aquatileG.mobilisS.alviC.litopenaeiV.stercorariaV.filiformis
V.massiliensis

23.20%

2.4±

30.00%

2.45±

29.40%

2.45±

26.80%

2.45±

30.80%

2.45±

21.50%

2.35±

28.30%

2.45±

C.tainanensis

18.80%

2.3±

19.30%

2.25±

31.10%

2.45±

19.20%

2.3±

19.70%

2.3±

26.30%

2.4±

C.aquatile

18.30%

2.25±

37.20%

2.5 ± 

25.60%

2.45±

28.40%

2.45±

19.50%

2.3±

G.mobilis

29.30%

2.45±

18.7%

2.25±

31.20%

2.45±

18.50%

2.3±

S.alvi

33.8%

2.5±

24.00%

2.35±

29.60%

2.45±

C.litopenaei

32.9%

2.5±

18.40%

2.25±

V.stercoraria

31.60%

2.45±

V.massiliensis Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T, G.mobilis Gulbenkiania mobilis E4FC31, C.litopenaei Chitinilyticum litopenaei DSM _21440_c1, S.alvi Snodgrassella alvi wkB2 wkB2, C.tainanensis Chitinibacter tainanensis BCRC 17254, C.aquatile Chitinilyticum aquatile c14, V.stercoraria Vitreoscilla stercoraria ATCC 15218 and V.filiformis Vitreoscilla filiformis ATCC 15551

Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins Heatmap generated with OrthoANI values calculated using the OAT software between Vitreoscilla species and other closely related species with standing in nomenclature Pairwise comparison of Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T with other species using GGDC, formula 2(DNA-DNA hybridization estimates based on identities/HSP length) 23.20% 2.4± 30.00% 2.45± 29.40% 2.45± 26.80% 2.45± 30.80% 2.45± 21.50% 2.35± 28.30% 2.45± 18.80% 2.3± 19.30% 2.25± 31.10% 2.45± 19.20% 2.3± 19.70% 2.3± 26.30% 2.4± 18.30% 2.25± 37.20% 2.5 ± 25.60% 2.45± 28.40% 2.45± 19.50% 2.3± 29.30% 2.45± 18.7% 2.25± 31.20% 2.45± 18.50% 2.3± 33.8% 2.5± 24.00% 2.35± 29.60% 2.45± 32.9% 2.5± 18.40% 2.25± 31.60% 2.45± V.massiliensis Vitreoscilla massiliensis SN6T, G.mobilis Gulbenkiania mobilis E4FC31, C.litopenaei Chitinilyticum litopenaei DSM _21440_c1, S.alvi Snodgrassella alvi wkB2 wkB2, C.tainanensis Chitinibacter tainanensis BCRC 17254, C.aquatile Chitinilyticum aquatile c14, V.stercoraria Vitreoscilla stercoraria ATCC 15218 and V.filiformis Vitreoscilla filiformis ATCC 15551

Conclusion

Based on the phenotypic characteristics, and phylogenetic and genomic analyses of strain SN6T, we suggest the creation of a new species within the Vitreoscilla genus, for which the name V. massiliensis sp. nov., is proposed.

Description of Vitreoscilla massiliensis sp. nov.

Vitreoscilla massiliensis (mas.si.li.en’sis. L. fem. adj. massiliensis, of Massilia, the Latin name of Marseille where strain SN6T was first isolated). Cells are Gram-negative (0.5 × 1.5–2 µm), non-motile, non-spore-forming , and often occur in a long chain under electron microscopy. V. massiliensis SN6T grows at 28–37 °C and pH 7–7.5 and does not grow above 0.5% salinity. V. massiliensis SN6T grows under microaerophilic atmosphere and a lower growth was observed under anerobic conditions. On agar plates, colonies were gray, smooth, and hemolytic with 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter after 48 h of incubation under aerobic conditions. They are catalase and oxidase negative. Tests were negative for urease, the reduction of nitrates, indole production, and fermentation of β-galactosidase. API 50CH shows that the carbohydrates provided by this panel were not used. V. massiliensis SN6T is susceptible to Vancomycin (0.5), Cefotaxime (0.94), Tobamycin (0.38 µg), Fosfomycin (16 µg), Teicoplanin (1.5 µg), Rifampicin (0.29 µg), Colistin (0.32 µg), Imipenem (0.23 µg), Erythromycin (0.25 µg), Ceftriaxone (0.32 µg), and resistant to Oxacillin and Metronidazole. Major fatty acids are hexadecanoic acid (C16:00), 9-hexadecenoic acid (C16:1n7), and an unusual cylo fatty acid named 2-hexyl-cyclopropaneoctanoic acid (C16:0 9,10-methylene). The DNA G + C content is about 49.4%. The type strain is SN6T (=CSUR P2036 = LN870312 = DSM 100958) and was isolated from the stool specimen of an obese Amazonian patient.
  25 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Evaluation of the PREVI® Isola automated seeder system compared to reference manual inoculation for antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disk diffusion method.

Authors:  S Le Page; A van Belkum; C Fulchiron; R Huguet; D Raoult; J-M Rolain
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Physiological studies on Vitreoscilla stercoraria.

Authors:  D C Mayfield; A S Kester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Saber Khelaifia; Maryam Tidjani Alou; Sokhna Ndongo; Niokhor Dione; Perrine Hugon; Aurelia Caputo; Frédéric Cadoret; Sory Ibrahima Traore; El Hadji Seck; Gregory Dubourg; Guillaume Durand; Gaël Mourembou; Elodie Guilhot; Amadou Togo; Sara Bellali; Dipankar Bachar; Nadim Cassir; Fadi Bittar; Jérémy Delerce; Morgane Mailhe; Davide Ricaboni; Melhem Bilen; Nicole Prisca Makaya Dangui Nieko; Ndeye Mery Dia Badiane; Camille Valles; Donia Mouelhi; Khoudia Diop; Matthieu Million; Didier Musso; Jônatas Abrahão; Esam Ibraheem Azhar; Fehmida Bibi; Muhammad Yasir; Aldiouma Diallo; Cheikh Sokhna; Felix Djossou; Véronique Vitton; Catherine Robert; Jean Marc Rolain; Bernard La Scola; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Anthony Levasseur; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 17.745

6.  The 5' terminal oligopyrimidine tract confers translational control on TOP mRNAs in a cell type- and sequence context-dependent manner.

Authors:  D Avni; Y Biberman; O Meyuhas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Cultivation and characterization of the gut symbionts of honey bees and bumble bees: description of Snodgrassella alvi gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Neisseriaceae of the Betaproteobacteria, and Gilliamella apicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of Orbaceae fam. nov., Orbales ord. nov., a sister taxon to the order 'Enterobacteriales' of the Gammaproteobacteria.

Authors:  Waldan K Kwong; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Chitinibacter tainanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a chitin-degrading aerobe from soil in Taiwan.

Authors:  Lih-Ling Chern; Erko Stackebrandt; Shu-Fen Lee; Fwu-Ling Lee; Jeen-Kuan Chen; Huei-Mei Fu
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  Gorillibacterium timonense sp. nov. and Vitreoscilla massiliensis sp. nov., two new bacterial species isolated from stool specimens of obese Amazonian patients.

Authors:  S Ndongo; J-C Lagier; D Raoult; P-E Fournier
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2018-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.