Literature DB >> 34165508

Prognosis of Patients With Early Breast Cancer Receiving 5 Years vs 2 Years of Adjuvant Bisphosphonate Treatment: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas W P Friedl1, Tanja Fehm2, Volkmar Müller3, Werner Lichtenegger4, Jens Blohmer5, Ralf Lorenz6, Helmut Forstbauer7, Visnja Fink1, Inga Bekes1, Jens Huober1, Julia Jückstock8, Andreas Schneeweiss9, Hans Tesch10, Sven Mahner8, Sara Y Brucker11, Georg Heinrich12, Lothar Häberle13, Peter A Fasching13, Matthias W Beckmann13, Robert E Coleman14, Wolfgang Janni1, Brigitte Rack1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Bisphosphonate treatment in patients with early breast cancer has become part of care, but the optimal treatment duration is still unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 vs 5 years of zoledronate treatment following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The SUCCESS A phase 3 multicenter randomized open-label clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design enrolled 3754 patients from September 21, 2005, to March 12, 2007 (last patient out, May 7, 2014). Final data analysis was conducted from September 2019 to October 2020. In 250 German study centers, patients were eligible for participation in the SUCCESS A trial if they had either node-positive or high-risk node-negative (defined as at least 1 of the following: tumor size ≥ pT2, histologic grade 3, negative hormone receptor status, or age ≤35 years) primary invasive breast cancer.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were first randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy with 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel with or without gemcitabine (not presented in this report). After chemotherapy, patients underwent a second randomization of 5 years of zoledronate treatment (4 mg intravenously every 3 months for 2 years, followed by 4 mg intravenously every 6 months for 3 years) vs 2 years of zoledronate treatment (4 mg intravenously every 3 months for 2 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point of the study was disease-free survival; secondary end points were overall survival, distant disease-free survival, and the incidence of skeletal-related adverse events. Survival times were measured from 2 years after the start of zoledronate treatment (landmark analysis).
RESULTS: Overall, data on 2987 patients were available for analysis; median age was 53 (range, 21-86) years. Disease-free survival, overall survival, and distant disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment arms (5 vs 2 years) as shown by adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models (disease-free survival: hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75-1.25; P = .81; overall survival: HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.67-1.42; P = .90; distant disease-free survival: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.18; P = .38). Adverse events were observed more often in the 5-year (46.2%) vs 2-year (27.2%) zoledronate treatment arm, which was particularly true for the skeletal-related events bone pain (5 years, 8.3% vs 2 years, 3.7%) and arthralgia (5 years, 5.1% vs 2 years, 3.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this phase 3 randomized clinical trial indicate that extending the zoledronate treatment beyond 2 years does not improve the prognosis of high-risk patients with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, suggesting that the currently recommended bisphosphonate treatment duration of 3 to 5 years could be reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02181101.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34165508      PMCID: PMC8227465          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   33.006


  5 in total

1.  Optimal duration of adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment for high-risk early breast cancer: Results from a SUCCESS trial.

Authors:  Mingbei Lu; Beibei Ren; Lingyan Rao
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2022.

Authors:  Nina Ditsch; Achim Wöcke; Michael Untch; Christian Jackisch; Ute-Susann Albert; Maggie Banys-Paluchowski; Ingo Bauerfeind; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Wilfried Budach; Peter Dall; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Michael Friedrich; Bernd Gerber; Oleg Gluz; Nadia Harbeck; Jörg Heil; Jens Huober; Hans H Kreipe; David Krug; Thorsten Kühn; Sherko Kümmel; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Sibylle Loibl; Diana Lüftner; Michael Patrick Lux; Nicolai Maass; Christoph Mundhenke; Ulrike Nitz; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Toralf Reimer; Kerstin Rhiem; Achim Rody; Marcus Schmidt; Andreas Schneeweiss; Florian Schütz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Christine Solbach; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Elmar Stickeler; Christoph Thomssen; Isabell Witzel; Volkmar Müller; Wolfgang Janni; Marc Thill
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 3.  Bone-Targeted Agents and Metastasis Prevention.

Authors:  Robert Coleman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Does the Presence of Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Patients Predict the Site of First Metastasis-Results from the Adjuvant SUCCESS A Trial.

Authors:  Elisabeth K Trapp; Peter A Fasching; Tanja Fehm; Andreas Schneeweiss; Volkmar Mueller; Nadia Harbeck; Ralf Lorenz; Claudia Schumacher; Georg Heinrich; Fabienne Schochter; Amelie de Gregorio; Marie Tzschaschel; Brigitte Rack; Wolfgang Janni; Thomas W P Friedl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Accuracy and Utility of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yihong Huang; Shuo Zheng; Yu Lin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.