| Literature DB >> 34164196 |
Masashi Kobayashi1, Yohei Wada2, Yasuro Okumiya2, Koji Yataka2, Katsunori Suzuki2, Yasuhiro Nakashima1, Hironori Ishibashi1, Kenichi Okubo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This feasibility study aimed to detect respiratory waveforms from thoracic movements and evaluate if postoperative complications could be predicted using a carbon nanotube sensor.Entities:
Keywords: Fourier transform; Respiratory waveform; stretchable sensor
Year: 2021 PMID: 34164196 PMCID: PMC8182515 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Figure 1Stretchable carbon nanotube sensor system. (A) Schema of stretchable sensor system, 1ch: right chest wall, 2ch: left chest wall; (B) nano-structure change of CNT; (C) working mechanism of the CNT sensor. CNT, carbon nanotube.
Figure 2Photo image of stretchable sensor attachment site on chest wall.
Figure 3The relative change of resistance in chest motion from stretch to shrink. (A) Inhalation; (B) exhalation.
Figure 4Schema of peak value as the maximum value of the envelope using FFT. Red arrow; peak value point. (A) The envelope of normal lung function was almost flat line. (B) The envelope of abnormal lung function had remarkable time fluctuation. FFT, fast fourier transform.
List of postoperative complication related to chest wall motion
| Complication | AE: ≥ grade IIIa |
|---|---|
| Air leakage | >5 days or Need treatment |
| Atelectasis | Need bronchoscopy |
| Pneumonia | Need bronchoscopy |
| Atrial fibrillation | Need treatment under local anesthesia |
| Bradyarrhythmia | Need treatment under local anesthesia |
| Schemic heart disease | Need a percutaneous coronary intervention |
| Subcutaneous emphysema | Need replacement of drain |
| Wound infection | Need treatment under local anesthesia |
AE, adverse event.
Clinical characteristics of patients
| Group | Normal (n=22) | Low (n=28) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male: 12, female: 10 | Male: 25, female: 3 | <0.01 |
| Age, y | 69.8 | 70.8 | n.p |
| Body Mass Index | 23±2.7 | 22.8±2.3 | n.p |
| Brinkman index | 699 | 967 | <0.01 |
| Lung cancer/metastatic/benign | 18/4/0 | 24/3/1 | n.p |
| Respiratory function | |||
| VC (median) | 3.03±0.7 | 3.28±0.8 | n.p |
| %VC (median) | 112±13 | 105±18 | n.p |
| FEV1 (median) | 2.3±0.6 | 2.18±0.6 | n.p |
| %FEV1 (median) | 77.2±6.1 | 65.8±14 | <0.01 |
| DLCO (median) | 15.6±4.5 | 12.1±4.2 | <0.01 |
| %DLCO (median) | 104±22 | 72.4±20 | <0.01 |
| Surgery | |||
| Thoracotomy/VATS | 3/19 | 14/14 | <0.01 |
| Lobectomy/segmentectomy | 17/5 | 21/7 | n.p |
| Operated side (R/L) | 14/8 | 16/12 | n.p |
| Recording time (min) | 823 | 738 | n.p |
| Respiratory rate (/min) | 13.5 | 14.7 | n.p |
| Postoperative complication | 2 (9%) | 7 (25%) | n.p |
Figure 5Schema of FFT analysis. (A) Preoperative FFT analysis in case 1: (B) Postoperative FFT analysis in case 1: heat map of respiration cycles in normal lung function. Upper: Right lung, Lower: Left lung. Case 1: VATS lobectomy, operation side: left side. (C) Preoperative FFT analysis in case 2. (D) Postoperative FFT analysis in case 2: heat map of respiration cycles in low lung function patient. Heat map show discontinuous waveform. Upper: Right lung, Lower: Left lung. Case 2: VATS lobectomy, operation side: right side. FFT, fast fourier transform.
Analysis of overall envelope peak value by Hilbert transform
| Operated side | Non-operated side | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall envelope peak value | 0.195±0.05 | 0.18±0.06 | n.p |
| Approach | Thoracotomy [17] | VATS [33] | |
| Operated side | 0.186 | 0.19 | n.p |
| Non-operated side | 0.19 | 0.174 | n.p |
| Procedure | Lobectomy [38] | Segmentectomy [12] | |
| Operated side | 0.19 | 0.181 | n.p |
| Non-operated side | 0.184 | 0.178 | n.p |
Analysis of envelope peak value at postoperative complication
| Absence | Presence | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postoperative complication | n=41 | n=9 | |
| R-peak value | 0.173±0.05 | 0.218±0.06 | 0.034 |
| L-peak value | 0.173±0.06 | 0.215±0.06 | 0.048 |
| Operated side peak value | 0.177±0.05 | 0.218±0.08 | n.p |
| Non-operated side peak value | 0.168±0.06 | 0.213±0.06 | 0.031 |
| Air leakage | n=41 | n=6 | |
| R-peak value | 0.173±0.05 | 0.222±0.1 | n.p |
| L-peak value | 0.173±0.06 | 0.225±0.06 | 0.041 |
| Operated side | 0.179±0.05 | 0.229±0.09 | 0.045 |
| Non-operated side | 0.168±0.06 | 0.217±0.07 | n.p |
| Atelectasis | n=41 | n=3 | |
| R-peak value | 0.173±0.05 | 0.21±0.04 | n.p |
| L-peak value | 0.173±0.05 | 0.196±0.05 | n.p |
| Operated side | 0.179±0.05 | 0.196±0.05 | n.p |
| Non-operated side | 0.168±0.06 | 0.21±0.04 | n.p |