Lucile Rapin1, Rihab Gamaoun2, Cynthia El Hage2, Maria Fernanda Arboleda2, Erin Prosk2. 1. Research Department, Santé Cannabis, 4150 Ste-Catherine O. Bureau 225, Montréal, QC, H3Z 2Y5, Canada. lrapin@santecannabis.ca. 2. Research Department, Santé Cannabis, 4150 Ste-Catherine O. Bureau 225, Montréal, QC, H3Z 2Y5, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a primary component in the cannabis plant; however, in recent years, interest in CBD treatments has outpaced scientific research and regulatory advancement resulting in a confusing landscape of misinformation and unsubstantiated health claims. Within the limited results from randomized controlled trials, and lack of trust in product quality and known clinical guidelines and dosages, real-world evidence (RWE) from countries with robust regulatory frameworks may fill a critical need for patients and healthcare professionals. Despite growing evidence and interest, no real-world data (RWD) studies have yet investigated patients' reports of CBD impact on symptom control in the common expression of pain, anxiety, depression, and poor wellbeing. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of CBD-rich treatment on symptom burden, as measured with a specific symptom assessment scale (ESAS-r). METHODS: This retrospective observational study examined pain, anxiety, depression symptoms, and wellbeing in 279 participants over 18 years old, prescribed with CBD-rich treatment at a network of clinics dedicated to medical cannabis in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected at baseline, 3 (FUP1), and 6 (FUP2) month after treatment initiation. Groups were formed based on symptom severity (mild vs moderate/severe) and based on changes to treatment plan at FUP1 (CBD vs THC:CBD). Two-way mixed ANOVAs were used to assess ESAS-r scores differences between groups and between visits. RESULTS: All average ESAS-r scores decreased between baseline and FUP1 (all ps < 0.003). The addition of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) during the first follow-up had no effect on symptom changes. Patients with moderate/severe symptoms experienced important improvement at FUP1 (all ps < 0.001), whereas scores on pain, anxiety, and wellbeing of those with mild symptoms actually increased. Differences in ESAS-r scores between FUP1 and FUP2 were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: This retrospective observational study suggests CBD-rich treatment has a beneficial impact on pain, anxiety, and depression symptoms as well as overall wellbeing only for patients with moderate to severe symptoms; however, no observed effect on mild symptoms. The results of this study contribute to address the myths and misinformation about CBD treatment and demand further investigation.
BACKGROUND:Cannabidiol (CBD) is a primary component in the cannabis plant; however, in recent years, interest in CBD treatments has outpaced scientific research and regulatory advancement resulting in a confusing landscape of misinformation and unsubstantiated health claims. Within the limited results from randomized controlled trials, and lack of trust in product quality and known clinical guidelines and dosages, real-world evidence (RWE) from countries with robust regulatory frameworks may fill a critical need for patients and healthcare professionals. Despite growing evidence and interest, no real-world data (RWD) studies have yet investigated patients' reports of CBD impact on symptom control in the common expression of pain, anxiety, depression, and poor wellbeing. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of CBD-rich treatment on symptom burden, as measured with a specific symptom assessment scale (ESAS-r). METHODS: This retrospective observational study examined pain, anxiety, depression symptoms, and wellbeing in 279 participants over 18 years old, prescribed with CBD-rich treatment at a network of clinics dedicated to medical cannabis in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected at baseline, 3 (FUP1), and 6 (FUP2) month after treatment initiation. Groups were formed based on symptom severity (mild vs moderate/severe) and based on changes to treatment plan at FUP1 (CBD vs THC:CBD). Two-way mixed ANOVAs were used to assess ESAS-r scores differences between groups and between visits. RESULTS: All average ESAS-r scores decreased between baseline and FUP1 (all ps < 0.003). The addition of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) during the first follow-up had no effect on symptom changes. Patients with moderate/severe symptoms experienced important improvement at FUP1 (all ps < 0.001), whereas scores on pain, anxiety, and wellbeing of those with mild symptoms actually increased. Differences in ESAS-r scores between FUP1 and FUP2 were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: This retrospective observational study suggests CBD-rich treatment has a beneficial impact on pain, anxiety, and depression symptoms as well as overall wellbeing only for patients with moderate to severe symptoms; however, no observed effect on mild symptoms. The results of this study contribute to address the myths and misinformation about CBD treatment and demand further investigation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anxiety; Cannabidiol; Depression; Effectiveness; Medical cannabis; Pain; Symptoms
Authors: Marcel O Bonn-Miller; Matthew Tyler Boden; Meggan M Bucossi; Kimberly A Babson Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Mateus M Bergamaschi; Regina Helena Costa Queiroz; Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas; Danielle Chaves Gomes de Oliveira; Bruno Spinosa De Martinis; Flávio Kapczinski; João Quevedo; Rafael Roesler; Nadja Schröder; Antonio E Nardi; Rocio Martín-Santos; Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak; Antonio Waldo Zuardi; José Alexandre S Crippa Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Zeeshan Butt; Lynne I Wagner; Jennifer L Beaumont; Judith A Paice; Amy H Peterman; Dan Shevrin; Jamie H Von Roenn; George Carro; Joshua L Straus; J Cameron Muir; David Cella Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2007-10-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Paul D Morrison; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Rocio Martin-Santos; Stefan Borgwardt; Toby Winton-Brown; Chiara Nosarti; Colin M O' Carroll; Marc Seal; Paul Allen; Mitul A Mehta; James M Stone; Nigel Tunstall; Vincent Giampietro; Shitij Kapur; Robin M Murray; Antonio W Zuardi; José A Crippa; Zerrin Atakan; Philip K McGuire Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: R Martin-Santos; J A Crippa; A Batalla; S Bhattacharyya; Z Atakan; S Borgwardt; P Allen; M Seal; K Langohr; M Farré; A W Zuardi; P K McGuire Journal: Curr Pharm Des Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.116
Authors: Edward Chesney; Dominic Oliver; Alastair Green; Simina Sovi; Jack Wilson; Amir Englund; Tom P Freeman; Philip McGuire Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: M Kathryn Dahlgren; Celine El-Abboud; Ashley M Lambros; Kelly A Sagar; Rosemary T Smith; Staci A Gruber Journal: Menopause Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 3.310